1. CMV Studies: Crash Causation and Safety Belt Use Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E. Professor Wayne State University Transportation Research Group March 13, 2007

2. Crash Statistics in Michigan Source: www.michigantrafficcrashfacts. org

3. Source: www.michigan.gov/mdotwww.michigan.gov/mdot (Total VMT for 1999-2005 and CVMT for 2001 and 2005) *CVMT was assumed to maintain a 7.23% growth rate per year

4. CMV Fatalities 5,000 Average Fatalities per Year involving Commercial Motor Vehicles (CMV’S) across Nation* 20% were Occupants of Commercial Motor Vehicles 80% were Passenger Vehicle Occupants 80% of the CMV Occupants killed were due to non-use of safety belts * Source: “Safety Belt Usage by Commercial Motor Vehicle Drivers Final Report”, November 2003, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

5. WSU’s 2004 Truck Safety Study Phase I- Meta Analysis Review and synthesize the literature on truck safety for long-term impacts of: Driver training, enforcement and regulations Identify technology options Phase II- Evaluation Plans for: Specialized Truck Enforcement Team (STET) Program Driver Performance Measurement (DPM) Program Decision Driving Course Program Safety Audit Program Review and synthesize the literature on evaluation studies Identify data needs to conduct evaluation studies

6. CMV Crash Causation Percent of incidents due to drivers’ faults is greater than vehicle defects, environment or other causes Gou, et. al. study in Montreal, Quebec, 1999 Toth, et. al. study in the USA, 2003 Craft & Blower study in the USA, 2003

8. The following predominant causes of car- truck crashes were identified from the state- of-the-art review Excessive Speeding Driver Inattention Following too closely Failure to stop/yield Failure to stay in lane/improper merge Driver Fatigue CMV Crash Causation

9. Safety Belt Usage for CMV Drivers Study conducted by USDOT and FMCSA in 2003 12 State Sample (not including Michigan) One County Group from each State 117 Observation Sites 2003 CMV Safety Belt Use Study

10. USDOT and FMSCA Study Findings 3,909 Commercial Motor Vehicles Observed 48% Overall Safety Belt Usage The Overall Safety Belt Usage Rate was weighted by the estimated truck VMT 1.4% Standard Error National and Major Regional Fleets: 55% Safety Belt Use Independent or Local Fleets: 44% Safety Belt Use 2003 CMV Safety Belt Usage

11. WSU’s 2006 CMV Safety Belt Use Study Determine CMV Driver and Passenger Safety Belt Use Direct Observational Surveys Safety Belt Use and Misuse Geographic Characteristics Demographic Characteristics

12. Sample Size Followed NHTSA Criteria for Passenger Vehicle Safety Belt Observations 32-county sample representing 86.86% of Michigan’s population 3 additional counties representing the UP were also added to the sample

13. County Partitioning Counties Partitioned into 5 Strata Based upon Previous Safety Belt Criteria, Total Vehicle Miles of Travel as well as Commercial Vehicle Miles of Travel (CVMT) Number of Observations per Strata Based upon % of CVMT

14. Study Locations Locations Randomly Selected Freeway Exit/Entrance Ramps Truck Stops Truck Parking Lots Rest Areas Signalized Intersections Weigh Stations avoided due to Police/ Weigh Master Presence

15. Observational Surveys 50-minute Survey Period 5 Vehicle Observational Target at Signalized Intersections 10 Vehicle Observational Target at Other Locations Overall Target of 1,720 CMV Safety Belt Observations

16. Observer Training One-Day Training Course on Safety Belt Observations Conducted at WSU-TRG Facilities 5-Day Field Data Collection Training on CMV Safety Belt Observations QA/QC, Repeatability and Reliability Study

17. Data Collection Timelines March 6 through April 15, 2006 Sunday through Saturday 7 am through 7 pm Equal Probability of being included in the sample

18. Data Collection Vehicle Data Collected Vehicle Type Ownership Range Type of Cargo Carrier Name License Plate, State of Registration Driver and Passenger Data Collected Safety Belt Use and Misuse Gender Age Ethnicity

19. Data Collection 181 Locations Observed 2,528 CMV’s Observed 2,644 Drivers and Passengers Observed 21 Locations did not have CMV Traffic at the Time of Observation Alternate Locations were utilized

20. Findings of Observational Survey Overall Weighted Safety Belt Use was calculated by summing the product of the stratum safety belt use rate and the stratum weight by the sum of the strata weights Each stratum weight was determined by dividing the estimate CVMT in the stratum by the highest estimated CVMT for all the strata The 95 percent confidence band were calculated by multiplying 1.96 by the square root of the variance The standard error was equal to the square root of the variance The relative error was calculated by dividing the standard error by the weighted overall safety belt use rate

21. Findings of Observational Survey CMV Safety Belt Use Rates by Type of Vehicle

22. Findings of Observational Survey CMV Safety Belt Use Rates by Type of Ownership, Range and Cargo Type of Ownership Range of VehicleType of Cargo

23. Conclusions Michigan appears to have exceeded the national average for CMV Safety Belt Use Michigan: 73.6%, 2006 Study National: 48%, 2003 Study Targeted Programs should be aimed at local fleets, dump trucks and construction vehicles