Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStephany Cross Modified over 8 years ago
1
PARIS21 EVALUATION Progress so far PARIS21 Steering Committee meeting OECD Conference Centre 4 June 2009
2
Organisation of the Presentation Framework for Tracking of Progress Evaluation Objectives Evaluators’ TORs Formation of Evaluation Reference Group Evaluators Profile / Selection Process Time Frame for Activities
3
Overall Tracking of Progress Six-monthly reports on progress of Secretariat activities and outputs. (presented earlier) Annual reports on progress of the wider partnership towards its outputs and outcomes. (presented in November) Three-to-five yearly evaluations of progress towards the partnership’s goal and purpose. (this presentation)
4
Evaluation Objectives Consider PARIS21’s original vision. Review progress towards the partnership’s goal and purpose, relating to the use of statistics to inform development policy decisions and implementation; and towards developing a culture of evidence-based decision-making. Provide recommendations for the future of PARIS21 and consider how the partnership may need to reorient itself and be re- energised to face both the continuing and new challenges, including a restatement of partnership aims and the roles of each type of partner.
5
Evaluators’ TORs Engage with developing countries to assess the following: the extent of National Statistical Office/ National Statistical System involvement in PRSP design processes; use of statistics and statistical analysis in PRSP design, planning for implementation, monitoring and evaluation processes; the extent to which statistical development needs were considered and addressed in the PRSP. Conduct a desk review of country assistance strategies and assess donor behaviour in co-ordinating their aid and respecting Paris Declaration principles at the country level.
6
Evaluation Reference Group Composed of the PARIS21 Bureau, plus evaluation experts from OECD/DAC, World Bank, CIDA/Statistics Canada, Netherlands, outside consultant. Have met twice and agreed the TORs. Will oversee the evaluation process.
7
Consultants Individuals, not firms. Fresh perspective. Tender process through the World Bank. Applications already received, further details requested.
8
Time frame for activities ActivitiesDate Selection of evaluatorsJune 2009 Evaluation processJune – August Inception reportMid-July Completion of first draft of evaluation reportend August Finalisation of evaluation reportend September Presentation of evaluation report to Consortium meetingNovember
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.