1. TEMPORAL DISPLACEMENTS: NEW EVIDENCE ON THE BINDING PROBLEM Ekaterina Pechenkova Moscow State University

2. Binding Problem : how does the brain bind different types of information within unitary percepts of objects and scenes? Aspects of the Binding Problem: units of binding (features, objects, locations) binding mechanism

3. Temporal Displacements are phenomena of distorted temporal order perception Physically: simultaneous event 1event 2event 1event 2 Psychologically: successive Physical time scale Psychological time scale Physical time scale Psychological time scale Physical time scale Psychological time scale

4. Temporal displacements of at least one kind (distortions of simultaneous synthesis) are certainly binding errors. Thus, these phenomena may serve as new evidence on the famous “binding problem” and as a promising tool for studying binding mechanisms. Distortions of simultaneous synthesis emerge from accomplishment of a task demanding for a conjunction of events. Example of a task: to identify an event simultaneous with alarm clock ringing.

5. RAPID SERIAL R A P I D S E R I A L Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP)  ll usory Conjunctions + 1 - 2 S D S P D P S t

6.  - ? Complicational Experiment

7. Hypothesis Temporal displacements can be produced at least at two different levels of binding – feature integration level, producing both normal percepts of objects and illusory conjunctions, and object binding level, producing both normal percepts of scenes and temporal displacements of events occurring to different objects (including events from different modalities).

8. Cyclic RSVP scale 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 t Key event 5 5 

9. Models of Temporal Displacements Parallel processing: one event is processed faster Serial processing: one event is processed first Physical time scale Binding Physical time scale Binding Limited capacity stage

10. Prior entry is an effect of attentional modulation of temporal displacements. Types of instruction in our experiment: Attending the RSVP scale Neutral (paying no special attention either to key dimension or to the RSVP scale) Attending the key dimension (color, underline, sound)

11. Hypothesis 2 to-be-bound information is processed serially temporal displacements in “attending key event” condition are more positive than in “attending RSVP scale” condition to-be-bound information is processed in parallel temporal displacements in “attending key event” condition are more negative than in “attending RSVP scale” condition OR

12. Comparative Study of Temporal Displacements: Results

14. Results of the First Group (N=16): Ordinary Auditory Experience

15. Results of the Second Group (N=11): Musicians

16. Results of the Third Group (N=4): Sound Technicians

17. More Results: Prior Entry Evidence for Serial Processing

18. Conclusions A comparative study of temporal displacements under uniformed RSVP conditions has revealed that there are at least two binding levels in human perceptual system — feature binding and object binding — each producing its own type of displacements. The object binding level is much more vulnerable to distortion than the feature integration level. Whether the key event and the to-be-reported event belong to the same or to different objects is a crucial factor for predicting magnitude of temporal displacement.

19. Conclusions Temporal displacement data imply serial rather than parallel processing of to-be- bound information at least at the object binding level. But, taking into account the previous data we can conclude that a new hybrid model of binding should be elaborated, assimilating evidence for both serial processing and two binding levels statements.