Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEzra Ray Modified over 8 years ago
1
www.jncc.gov.uk/marineconsult Marine Natura in UK 2009 offshore SAC consultation Charlotte Johnston, Tom Blasdale, Sophie Elliott, JNCC North Sea RAC Spatial Planning Working Group, 16 th Feb 2009 16/02/09
2
UK offshore site consultations Two draft offshore SACs for public consultation starting in early 2009
3
Oct-DecPre-consultation meetings with competent 2008authorities and key stakeholder groups 3 monthsFormal consultation period (start pending Government approval) 2 monthsAnalysis of consultation submissions and report to UK Government 2 monthsSites submitted to European Commission 2008-09 consultation timetable
4
Offshore site consultations Site documents for each possible site have been available since December 2008: scientific justification for identifying the site draft conservation objectives and advice on operations consultation impact assessments available early 2009 Consultation period: 12 weeks JNCC then compile submissions and provide a summary report JNCC use the comments/results on the scientific justification for the site from consultation to modify site proposals if appropriate and report to Government Government decide to submit site(s) to European Commission
5
2008-09 Consultation: Dogger Bank dSAC Draft Sandbanks slightly covered by seawater all the time; Harbour porpoise
6
Dogger Bank: slope analysis
7
Dogger Bank: infaunal communities
8
UK Dogger Bank: Adjacent European sites
9
IAs - Impact Assessments Government guidelines require an Impact Assessment for all policy changes (previously a Regulatory Impact Assessment or RIA) Impact Assessments examine the likely economic impacts of a policy change and the range of options for implementing it
10
IAs - Impact Assessments JNCC is preparing impact assessments for each site using contractors Based on likely maximum and minimum management scenarios following JNCC’s draft Conservation Objectives and Advice on Operations for each site Site-based Impact Assessments will be consulted on at the same time as the scientific justification for selection of the site. Impact assessments will be updated following the consultation incorporating information from all responding stakeholders
11
Information needed from stakeholders Information on what activities undertaken, their current and potential worth Information on likely additional costs incurred by industry if the site is designated Initial information to JNCC’s contractors during Nov-Dec 08 for inclusion in the Impact Assessment for consultation Comment and further input through 12 week formal site consultation
12
Knowledge of current activities Oil & gas installations
13
Knowledge of current activities Aggregate extraction licence areas
14
Knowledge of current activities Cables & pipelines
15
Knowledge of current activities Potential windfarm licence areas
16
Knowledge of current activities VMS data, demersal fisheries, all member states (2004)
17
ICES Rectangles at Dogger Bank
18
Types of fishing on Dogger Bank Table A3.1: Percentage of reported landings from in and around the draft SAC by fishing gear type Vessel typeICES Rectangles Wholly or Mainly In Site Boundary Bordering ICES (Rectangles wholly or mainly out ( waters only) ICES Rectangle 39F1, half in, half out of the site boundary Beam trawls81%55%44% Danish seines8%4%2% Otter trawls (not specified)4%11%6% Otter trawls - bottom2%6%8% Scottish seines1% 6% Longlines (not specified)1%0%3% Otter twin trawls0%5%2% Nephrops trawls0%8%5% Pair trawls - bottom0%2%23%* Set gillnets (anchored)0%1%0% Pots0%6%0% Otter trawls - midwater0%1% TOTAL100% Includes vessels of all nationalities as reported in landings data from July 2000 to June 2008 provided by the Marine Fisheries Agency.
19
Landings by country for Dogger Bank Table A3.2: Percentage of reported landings from in and around the Dogger Bank draft SAC by country of port Country of portICES Rectangles Wholly or Mainly In Site Boundary Bordering ICES (Rectangles wholly or mainly out ( waters only) ICES Rectangle 39F1, half in, half out of the site boundary Netherlands84%56%42% UK15%43%52% Denmark1% 3% Belgium0% Faroe Islands0% Norway0% 3% TOTAL100% Includes vessels of all nationalities as reported in landings data from July 2000 to June 2008 provided by the Marine Fisheries Agency.
20
Species caught at Dogger Bank Table A3.3: Percentage of reported landings by weight from in and around the draft SAC by species caught SpeciesICES Rectangles Wholly or Mainly In Site Boundary Bordering ICES Rectangles (wholly or mainly out - waters only) ICES Rectangle 39F1, half in, half out of the site boundary Plaice68%40%34% Lemon Sole8%5%10% Sole7%11%2% Turbot6%5%3% Dabs4%1%2% Cod1%5%3% Monks or Anglers1% 2% Spurdog1% 4% Haddock1%2%18% Brill1% Whelks1%0% Nephrops ( Lobster)0%17%8% Sand Eels0% 6% Squid0% 3% Red Mullet0% 2% Whiting0% 1% Crabs (C.P. Mixed Sexes)0%2%0% Skates and Rays0%1%0% Gurnards - Red0% 1% Lobsters0%3%0% TOTAL100% Includes vessels of all nationalities as reported in landings data from July 2000 to June 2008 provided by the Marine Fisheries Agency.
21
Information sought for Impact Assessment Identification of the number and types of vessel businesses that fish at Dogger Bank, including home port and fishing days within the SAC; How changes in landings at foreign ports might impact the UK economy; Views on how fishermen will respond to any potential closure; Where activity is displaced, difference in steam time, fuel costs, fishing levels and any other cost/profit information associated with displacement alternatives; Costs to not fish if site was designated and there were no suitable alternative sites such that site designation made some vessels unprofitable; Potential seasonal effects of designation; Any other data that would improve comparison of costs, earnings and profits for vessel businesses under the different scenarios; and Other sites for plaice catch, as well as level of catch at those sites and their sensitivity and importance for overall plaice stocks
22
UK SAC network Further areas of search to be assessed for selection as SACs for habitats
23
Summary Two UK possible offshore SACs (Dogger Bank & NW Rockall Bank) will be consulted upon early 2009 Consultation on the scientific justification for proposing the sites as SACs, plus likely socio- economic impact of site designation Information on socio-economic impact of designation requested now and during the public consultation Nine marine SACs off England (inshore and offshore) likely to be consulted upon in late 2009-10 JNCC are undertaking survey to complete the offshore Natura 2000 network We aim to make the process as open and inclusive as possible…
24
Further information All the information for the consultation will be available on the JNCC website: www.jncc.gov.uk/marineconsult The UK Offshore Marine Conservation Regulations: www.defra.gov.uk/marine/biodiversity/omcr.htm www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/20071842.htm To contact us about SACs: email: offshoresacs@jncc.gov.uk The consultation process - including registering your interest in taking part - email: offshoreconsult@jncc.gov.uk
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.