Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScot Briggs Modified over 9 years ago
1
Where Does the Time Go? Results of Educator Time Studies Judith Goodwin, MBA Elaine Sullivan, MS, RN, CDE
2
Objectives Describe benefits and methods of an educator time study Define the educator role and best use of time Analyze data from sample educator time studies to develop a CQI plan to improve efficiency
3
Where does the time go? Do you feel like you run through your day? At the end of the day do you feel like you didn’t get anything done? Does your manager have to justify your productivity? Do you feel pressured to do more, but don’t seem to know how? Let’s see if we can figure out what gets in the way…
4
Educator Roles Educator Clinician Coordinator Consultant Case Manager Mensing C & Mulcahy K. The Role of the Diabetes Educator in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in Goldstein BJ & Muller-Wieland D, eds. Textbook of Type 2 Diabetes. London: Martin Dunitz; 2003: 39-50.
5
Key Tasks to Fulfill the Role Teach patients self-management of diabetes Help patients evaluate their self-management Encourage & support patient behavior change Update patients on new therapies/options Identify community resources for patients Educate PCPs & the community on the role of the educator
6
Purpose of an Educator Time Study Identify how you are spending your time Identify activities that impede your ability to see patients Determine what activities can be eliminated or done by less expensive personnel Acknowledge activities that support the organization even if they impede the key tasks Discuss shifting cost of organization support to appropriate departments
7
Data Tool: Educator Daily Record Scheduled work hours 8 Actual worked hrs 8.25 Date: 6/12/07 Time1:1ClassChartingPhonesMtgsClericalInpatientMD support 8-930 9-1060 10-1160 11-1230 12-145 1-230 2-360 3-460 4-530 Total120 60 306045
8
Educator Time Study Summary Sheet Educ Total hrs worked 1:1 Hrs % Group Hrs % Direct Care Hrs % No show Hrs % Charts Hrs % Mtgs Hrs % Phones Hrs % Clerical Hrs % Inpt Hrs % Total
9
Process: Using the Data Tool Get consensus on categories/definitions Pick a typical time period when educators not on vacation or working on a major new project Gather a week of data Keep your Daily Record as you go through your day; don’t wait until the end of the day
10
Findings of 4 Educator Time Studies
11
Time Study Results - 2000 30 educators from 14 centers 1 week of data Average 8.8 hours worked/day 40% of time in direct patient care 14% Charting time 7% Phone time 5% Meeting time 27% time in “other”
12
Time Study Results - 2005 10 educators in 1 center 2 weeks of data Average 7.4 hours worked/day 30% of time in direct patient care 15% Charting time 7% Phone time 6% Meeting time 42% time in “other”
13
Time Study Results - 2006A 6 educators in 1 center 1 week Average 8.5 hours worked/day 30% time in direct patient care 25% Charting time 6% Phone time % Meeting time 23% time in “other ”
14
Time Study Results – 2006B 7 educators in 1 center 2 weeks Average 8.7 hours worked per day 36% time in direct patient care including inpatient 14% Charting time 8% Phone time 15% Meeting time (combined 5 specific “other”) 3% time in unidentified “other” because 9 categories of specific “other”
15
One Site’s Attempt to Improve Measurement of “Other”
16
Conclusions from 4 Time Studies
17
Direct patient care 30 – 37% Charting 14 – 25% Phone time 6 - 8% Meetings 5 – 15% Other 3 – 42% Wide individual variance
18
Our Programs Need to Be Financially as Well as Clinically Successful As educators our most important role is to be in front of patients educating Some activities support that role Some activities get in the way We need to identify and eliminate activities that get in the way of educating
19
If we only spend 30 – 37% of our time in direct/face to face/billable activities, we are not fulfilling our mission or assuring our financial viability!
20
Good medicine is good business!
21
Joslin’s Goals and Assumptions for Financial Viability 60% of an educators day is spent face to face in billable encounters with patients Groups are an effective and efficient way to increase financial viability Decreasing “no shows” and cancellations is essential to clinical and financial success Getting new patients in the door and bringing existing patients back is essential to clinical and financial success
22
Explaining the Gap Between Expectation and Reality Educators tend to respond to everyone’s needs generously We are used to giving away our expertise on the phone In centers that include medical management we are frequently pulled to be physician extenders Some PCPs give us their diabetes patients because of our expertise and we take on medical management of insulin by phone
23
Effective: Are we doing the right thing? Efficient: Are we doing it the right way?
24
We need to nurture patient independence!
25
Tasks that May Support or Impede Role Depending on Time Spent Charting/ documentation Phone calls Meetings Preparation for classes Orienting new hospital staff Email processing
26
Tasks that May Support or Impede Role Depending on Time Spent Driving to classes held in off-site locations Prescription refill support/clarification Professional development Marketing related activities PCP support Inpatient support Glucose log & CGM analysis
27
Tasks that could be done by less skilled staff Clerical functions - finding charts, filing, making copies, ordering booklets/supplies Scheduling appointments Calling/faxing referral sources for labs, signatures, etc Tracking diabetes patient education outcomes Looking for missing medical records
28
Tasks that could be done by less skilled staff Setting up room for classes Insurance verification Greeting and trouble-shooting “walk-in” visitors Phone triage Organizing diabetes walk (or other events) BG screening / meter downloading
29
Can we narrow our scope? Are we willing to let go of anything? Can documentation be streamlined? Are we practicing medicine without a license? Should we consider hiring clerical help rather than another educator? Do we limit/discourage patient access to us by phone?
30
Can we narrow our scope? Are we billing for all our services? Should inpatient responsibilities be in another department’s budget? Are we getting more out of students than we give? Are we successfully recruiting and using volunteers?
31
Tabulate & Calculate: Educator Time Study Summary Sheet Educ Total hrs worked 1:1 Hrs % Group Hrs % Direct Care Hrs % No show Hrs % Charts Hrs % Mtgs Hrs % Phones Hrs % Clerical Hrs % Inpt Hrs % RN 14313 (30)3 (7)16 (37%) 4 (9)10 (23)4 (9)6 (14)7 (16) RN 2244 (17)4 (17%)1 (4)2 (8) 13 (54) RD 33620 (55)3 (8)23 (64%) 2 (5)4 (11)2 (5)4 (11)3 (8) Total10337(36)6 (6)43 (42%) 6 (6)15 (14)8 (8%)12 (12) 13 (13)
32
Analyzing the Time Study: Individual Educators Does your own scheduling template have 60% of your time available to see patients? Is your personal schedule full? Are your DSMT visits in 30 minute increments? Are the other educators on your team more available to see patients? What can you learn from them? If you are one of the most productive on your team, what time management techniques can you teach the others? If you have administrative responsibilities, consider what percent of your time is spent in those activities.
33
Analyzing the Time Study: The Team If your team average is close to or over the goal, does individual productivity matter? Is there a difference between part time and full time educators? Do formal and informal team meetings and special projects take up too much time? Is time spent marketing increasing your patient base?
34
Analyzing the Time Study: The Team Is there a difference in how time is spent if the data is sorted by RN vs. RD? Is your “no show”/cancellation rate acceptable? How would the results look if all “not typical” days were removed? What can you learn from the range between individuals in some of the categories?
35
Developing a CQI Plan Identify the problem Collect data, tabulate, calculate and analyze Plan - discuss possible solutions Select something to try Act - implement change Evaluate the results Revise the plan
36
A Time study is only a tool in the CQI Process not the whole process! Analysis and discussion are critical to using the data to improve your program Select typical days/ weeks to do the study Decide together on definitions to avoid lots of “other” Set individual and team targets to increase direct patient time and decrease “other” Collaborate with team and administration to develop strategies to reach targets Set follow up time frame to repeat the time study
37
Another Example 4 educators in 1 center for 1 week Average 7.7 hrs/day worked 32% Time in direct patient care 6% Charting time 31% Phone time 7% Meeting time “Other” defined by team 10% Clerical 6% Chart search 2% Sales reps
38
Next Steps in CQI Process Phone time is a problem!!! Who is precipitating calls? Patients/Families, Educators, Physicians Are calls substituting for visits? What percent of calls are to cover for endocrinologists in the practice? What percent of calls are necessary vs. nice?
39
Next steps in CQI Process Define necessary calls Educate patients, physicians and each other about necessary vs. nice calls Set goals to decrease phone time by a specific percent for individuals and the team Re-measure and ???
40
Remember the time study is just the beginning of the CQI process! Send us your results - elaine.sullivan@joslin.harvard.edu elaine.sullivan@joslin.harvard.edu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.