1. Equipping Education Leaders, Advancing Ideas The Landscape of State Dual Enrollment Policy: Placing Florida in Context Jennifer Dounay Zinth Education Commission of the States For 2015 Connections Conference May 15, 2015

2. Greetings from Denver! Mother’s Day, 2015

3. About ECS National organization based in Denver, CO Non-partisan, nonprofit Funded by state fees, grants/contracts, corporate support Cover the P-20 spectrum Primary constituents = state-level education leaders in 50 states, D.C. and territories:  Governors  Legislators  Chiefs and state boards  Postsecondary leaders

4. Overview Model components of dual enrollment policy How states stack up, and how Florida compares 2014-15 trends in state dual enrollment policy From your perspective, what’s working, not working in Florida dual enrollment? Where can policy improve?

5. Dual Enrollment Database Available from www.ecs.orgwww.ecs.org Updated February 2015

6. Dual Enrollment Database

7. 20 data points Allows you to view all policies for a single state, or all states across a single policy component.

8. Dual Enrollment Database

9. Model Policy Components

10. Database and policy brief combined can help determine if policies in a state contribute – or provide unintentional barriers – to program access and quality.

11. Model Policy Components 13 components in four “buckets”: Access Finance Ensuring Course Quality Transferability of Credit

12. Model Policy Components Access 1. All eligible students are able to participate. 2. Student eligibility requirements are based on the demonstration of ability to access college-level content. 3. Caps on the maximum number of courses students may complete are not overly restrictive. 4. Students earn both secondary and postsecondary credit for successful completion of approved postsecondary courses. 5. All students and parents are annually provided with program information. 6. Counseling is made available to students/parents before and during program participation.

13. Component 1 All eligible students are able to participate Trend: 12 states (2008) → 8 states (2015) Florida: ↑ Mandatory

14. Component 2 Student eligibility based on demonstration of ability to access college-level content Trend: 2015: Only Ohio makes this the sole eligibility criterion. 2008: Kentucky was only state to make this the sole eligibility criterion. Policy approach to consider: Ohio: To participate in College Credit Plus, a student must apply to a college and meet the college’s established admissions and course placement standards.

15. Component 3 Caps on maximum # courses students may complete are not overly restrictive Trend: No cap in 10 states (2008) → 14 states (2015) Florida: ↑ No cap

16. Component 4 Students earn secondary & postsecondary credit for completing approved courses Trend: 26 states (2008) → 25 states + DC (2015) Florida: ↑ Both secondary and postsecondary credit awarded

17. Component 5 All students and parents are annually provided with program information Trend: 20 states (2008) → 15 states (2015) Florida: ↑ Yes Policy approach to consider: Ohio: Each public and participating nonpublic school must provide program information to all students in grades 6-11; promote the program on school website and schedule an informational session to allow each partnering college to meet with interested students/parents.

18. Component 6 Counseling is made available to students and parents before & during program participation Trend: 14 states (2008) → 20 states (2015) Florida: ↑ Yes Policy approach to consider: Washington: Institutions must make every effort to inform students of fee waivers for low-income students, including via social media. Ohio: Students must receive information about and encouragement to use PS partner’s counseling services.

19. Model Policy Components Finance 7. Responsibility for tuition payments does not fall to parents. 8. Districts and postsecondary institutions are fully funded or reimbursed for participating students.

20. Component 7 Responsibility for tuition payments does not fall to parents Trend: Student/parent primarily responsible for tuition in 22 states (2008) → 9 states (2015) Florida: ↑ District pays PS institution (unless course offered by high school faculty) Policy approach to consider: A variety of models in other states transfer tuition burden to parties other than students/parents.

21. Just released this week! Florida is one of the five states featured in this report.

22. Component 7 Responsibility for tuition: Alternatives Identify state agency to reimburse institutions for participating students. Reimburse institutions directly through legislative appropriation. Designate agency to distribute appropriation to institutions. Authorize workforce development funds to support programs. Authorize regional education service providers to support programs.

23. Component 8 Districts & postsecondary institutions fully funded or reimbursed for students Trend: For districts/high schools: 31 states (2008) → 30 states and DC (2015) For PS institutions: 38 states (2008) → 35 states + DC (2015) Florida: ↔Partial. While districts are not funded at a lower level for dually enrolled students, districts must cover student tuition from general operating funds.

24. Model Policy Components Ensuring Course Quality 9. Courses meet the same level of rigor as the course taught to traditional students at the partner postsecondary institution. 10. Instructors meet the same expectations as instructors of similar traditional postsecondary courses, and receive appropriate support and evaluation. 11. Districts and institutions publicly report on student participation and outcomes. 12. Programs undergo evaluation based on available data.

25. Component 9 Courses meet same rigor as courses taught to traditional students at partnering institution Trend: Not specified (2008) → 41 states (2015) Florida: ↑Yes

26. Component 10 Instructors meet same expectations as faculty of similar courses, receive support and evaluation Trend: Not specified (2008) → 30 states (2015) 8 states: Two or more dual enrollment programs, with instructor qualifications set in one, but either not applicable or not set in state policy for the other. 4 states: Dual enrollment courses not offered at high schools. Florida: ↑Yes

27. Component 11 Districts and institutions publicly report on student participation and outcomes Trend: 18 states (2008) → 31 states + DC (2015) Florida: ↑Yes Policy approach to consider: Colorado: DHE annually reports extensive information, including student demographics, number of credit hours completed, % of students who complete postsecondary.

28. Component 12 Programs undergo evaluation based on available data Trend: 13 states (2008) → 28 states (2015) Florida: ↑ Yes Policy approach to consider: North Carolina: NCCCS and DPI must jointly develop and implement a program accountability plan to evaluate short- and long-term program outcomes, including on HS completion, and PS entry, persistence and completion.

29. Model Policy Components Transferability of Credit 13. Postsecondary institutions accept dual enrollment credit as transfer credit, provided measures of quality are ensured.

30. Component 13 Postsecondary institutions accept dual enrollment credit as transfer credit, provided measures of quality are ensured Trend: 15 states (2008) → 24 states (2015) Florida: ↑Yes

31. In sum… Florida policies look good nationally (at least on paper) on: Nearly all model policy components

32. In sum… Potential areas for policy consideration: Access: Broaden eligibility criteria (e.g., remove GPA limitations) ?

33. In sum… Potential areas for policy consideration: Finance: Consider statewide approaches to minimize district tuition burden?

34. Thoughts? Reactions?

35. 2014-15 DE policy trends Complete rewrites in Ohio, New Jersey, Rhode Island Tuition supports Expanding course access Including by clarifying/expanding eligible grade levels Teacher/instructional supports CTE funding CTE access (including FL Collegiate High School Programs)

36. From your perspective, what’s working, not working in Florida dual enrollment? Where can policy improve?

37. Want to learn more about state dual enrollment policy and policy recommendations?

38. More ECS DE Resources CTE Dual Enrollment (March 2014) Rural Dual Enrollment (June 2014) Ensuring Course/Instructor Quality (February 2015) State Approaches to Funding Dual Enrollment (May 2015)

39. Education Commission of the States 700 Broadway, Suite 810 Denver, Colorado 80203 (303) 299-3689 www.ecs.org jzinth@ecs.org