1. Engaging and Empowering Majors to Succeed in ‘Fundamentals’ Courses at All Levels Jenni Evans and Richelle Allen-King

2. “Fundamentals” Courses for Majors Critical material for majors – faculty Unrewarding and difficult – students How can this dichotomy be resolved? Explore methods used by the leaders Identify problems relevant to participants Group brainstorming session Summary discussion

3. Motivation Strategies Communicate your expectations early and consistently reinforce them Provide plenty of feedback –Regular graded quizzes help/motivate/force students to keep up –Regular homeworks provide an opportunity for longer, worked problems –Post homework solutions promptly

4. Grading Strategies For larger classes, alternate 50% grading with your TA (if you have one), but do grade quizzes and/or homeworks yourself as they’re a great way to keep tabs on class progress When grading all material is infeasible, spot grade a “randomly” selected question

5. Engagement Strategies Constantly make the link between the math and the “real world” application –Problem-based framework –‘Field’ (or field-like) applications, hands-on examples or forecast sessions (lead with labs) –Translate math into physics and physics into math

6. Engagement Strategies Team problem challenges –Interactive group project: “Tornadoes and anthropogenic vorticity” example –Applied research projects: Riverine discharge example ‘4 ways’ –graph, tabulate, describe, apply or predict

7. Other Essentials Encourage controlled interaction Keep a “safe” classroom environment (being wrong is allowed, not trying is frowned upon) ‘Two minute essays’ to check in with students Have high standards for your students and yourself

8. Example 1: Riverine N discharge Local problem provides context to –Develop overarching course concept – mass balances and –Learn/practice selected quantitative skills Problem: What is the dominant source of Nitrogen (N) leading to eutrophic conditions in our local River?

9. What students do (1) Create hypotheses about temporal N pattern for different potential N sources based on study of selected background preparation Design and execute sampling plan (constraints by instructor) to test hypotheses

10. What students do (2) Use data collected to complete CHALLENGING calculations that evaluate hypotheses –limited data set, pencil and paper analysis first, then to EXCEL (new tool) Use available web data to extend the assessment beyond their measurements –practice Excel, more extensive data available, broaden interpretation) Work quantitatively with data in MANY ways

11. Example 2: “Tornadoes and Anthropogenic Vorticity” Premise is that cars cause an increase in the number of tornadoes in the USA: link is vorticity Paper published in Nature Journal article generated many detailed responses -- all about why the article is wrong Vorticity taught in class Use this as an applied problem

12. Example 2: “Tornadoes and Anthropogenic Vorticity” Each student provides a 1-2 page paper prior to the first class on this project Instructor assigned discussion groups based on talent and personality Groups discuss all aspects of their papers and the motivating publications and reach a “group consensus” These discussions are moderated

13. Example 2: “Tornadoes and Anthropogenic Vorticity” Each student completes another 1-2 page paper summarizing the group consensus and any arguments on which they differ The second discussion is class-wide Achieve >80% discussion participation typically This project receives rave reviews!

14. Discussion Think of a concept you want to convey: –How can you approach this in a novel way? –Brainstorm with group