Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLindsay Bradford Modified over 8 years ago
1
Basics of fMRI Time-Series Analysis Douglas N. Greve
2
2 fMRI Analysis Overview Higher Level GLM First Level GLM Analysis First Level GLM Analysis Subject 3 First Level GLM Analysis Subject 4 First Level GLM Analysis Subject 1 Subject 2 CX CX CX CX Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Raw Data CX
3
3 Overview Neuroanatomy 101 fMRI Contrast Mechanism Hemodynamic Response “Univariate” GLM Analysis Hypothesis Testing
4
4 Neuroantomy Gray matter White matter Cerebrospinal Fluid
5
5 Functional Anatomy/Brain Mapping
6
6 Visual Activation Paradigm Flickering Checkerboard Visual, Auditory, Motor, Tactile, Pain, Perceptual, Recognition, Memory, Emotion, Reward/Punishment, Olfactory, Taste, Gastral, Gambling, Economic, Acupuncture, Meditation, The Pepsi Challenge, … Scientific Clinical Pharmaceutical
7
7 MRI Scanner
8
8 Magnetic Resonance Imaging T1-weighted Contrast BOLD-weighted Contrast
9
9 Blood Oxygen Level Dependence (BOLD) Neurons Lungs OxygenCO2 Oxygenated Hemoglobin (DiaMagnetic) Deoxygenated Hemoglobin (ParaMagnetic) Contrast Agent
10
10 Functional MRI (fMRI) Localized Neural Firing Localized Increased Blood Flow Stimulus Localized BOLD Changes Sample BOLD response in 4D Space (3D) – voxels (64x64x35, 3x3x5mm^3, ~50,000) Time (1D) – time points (100, 2 sec) – Movie Time 1Time 2 Time 3 …
11
11 4D Volume 64x64x35 85x1
12
12 Visual/Auditory/Motor Activation Paradigm 15 sec ‘ON’, 15 sec ‘OFF’ Flickering Checkerboard Auditory Tone Finger Tapping
13
13 Block Design: 15s Off, 15s On Voxel 1 Voxel 2
14
14 Contrasts and Inference p = 10 -11, sig=-log10(p) =11 p =.10, sig=-log10(p) =1 Voxel 1Voxel 2
15
15 Statistical Parametric Map (SPM) +3% 0% -3% Contrast Amplitude ON - OFF Contrast Amplitude Variance (Error Bars) Significance t-Map (p,z,F) (Thresholded p<.01) “Massive Univariate Analysis” -- Analyze each voxel separately
16
16 Statistical Parametric Map (SPM) Signficance Map sig=-log10(p) Signed by contrast “Massive Univariate Analysis” -- Analyze each voxel separately
17
17 Hemodynamics Delay Dispersion Grouping by simple time point inaccurate
18
18 Hemodynamic Response Function (HRF) TR (~2sec) Time-to-Peak (~6sec) Dispersion Undershoot Equilibrium (~16-32sec) Delay (~1-2sec)
19
19 Convolution with HRF Shifts, rolls off; more accurate Loose ability to simply group time points More complicated analysis General Linear Model (GLM)
20
20 GLM Data fom one voxel = Task base + Baseline Offset (Nuisance) Task Task = on off Implicit Contrast HRF Amplitude base = off
21
21 Matrix Model y = X * Task base Data from one voxel Design Matrix Regressors = Vector of Regression Coefficients (“Betas”) Design Matrix Observations
22
22 Two Task Conditions y = X * Odd Even base Data from one voxel Design Matrix Regressors = Design Matrix Observations
23
23 Working Memory Task (fBIRN) ImagesStick Figs “Scrambled”EncodeDistractorProbe 16s Stick Figs 0. “Scrambled” – low-level baseline, no response 1. Encode – series of passively viewed stick figures Distractor – respond if there is a face 2. Emotional 3. Neutral Probe – series of two stick figures (forced choice) 4. Following Emotional Distractor 5. Following Neutral Distractor fBIRN: Functional Biomedical Research Network (www.nbirn.net)
24
24 Five Task Conditions Encode EmotDist NeutDist EmotProbe NeutProbe = y = X *
25
25 GLM Solution Encode EmotDist NeutDist EmotProbe NeutProbe = y = X * Set of simultaneous equations Each row of X is an equation Each column of X is an unknown s are unknown 142 Time Points (Equations) 5 unknowns
26
26 Estimation of s
27
27 Estimates of the HRF Amplitude Encode EmotDist NeutDist EmotProbe NeutProbe =
28
28 Hypotheses and Contrasts Which voxels respond more/less/differently to the Emotional Distractor than to the Neutral Distractor? Contrast: Assign Weights to each Beta
29
29 Hypotheses Which voxels respond more to the Emotional Distractor than to the Neutral Distractor? Which voxels respond to Encode (relative to baseline)? Which voxels respond to the Emotional Distractor? Which voxels respond to either Distractor? Which voxels respond more to the Probe following the Emotional Distractor than to the Probe following the Neutral Distractor?
30
30 Which voxels respond more to the Emotional Distractor than to the Neutral Distractor? 1. Encode2. EDist3. NDist 4. EProbe5. NProbe Only interested in Emotional and Neutral Distractors No statement about other conditions Condition: 1 2 3 4 5 Weight 0 +1 -1 0 0 Contrast Matrix C = [0 +1 -1 0 0]
31
31 Which voxels respond to Encode (relative to baseline)? 1. Encode2. EDist3. NDist 4. EProbe5. NProbe Only interested in Encode No statement about other conditions Condition: 1 2 3 4 5 Weight +1 0 0 0 0 Contrast Matrix C = [+1 0 0 0 0]
32
32 Which voxels respond to the Emotional Distractor (wrt baseline)? 1. Encode2. EDist3. NDist 4. EProbe5. NProbe Only interested in Emotional Distractor No statement about other conditions Condition: 1 2 3 4 5 Weight 0 +1 0 0 0 Contrast Matrix C = [0 +1 0 0 0]
33
33 Which voxels respond to either Distractor (wrt baseline)? 1. Encode2. EDist3. NDist 4. EProbe5. NProbe Only interested in Distractors Average of two Distractors No statement about other conditions Condition: 1 2 3 4 5 Weight 0 ½ ½ 0 0 Contrast Matrix C = [0 0.5 0.5 0 0] Don’t have so sum to 1, but usual Could have used an F-test instead of average
34
34 Which voxels respond more to the Probe following the Emotional Distractor than to the Probe following the Neutral Distractor? 1. Encode2. EDist3. NDist 4. EProbe5. NProbe Only interested in Probes No statement about other conditions Condition: 1 2 3 4 5 Weight 0 0 0 +1 -1 Contrast Matrix C = [0 0 0 +1 -1]
35
35 Contrasts and the Full Model
36
36 fMRI Analysis Overview Higher Level GLM First Level GLM Analysis First Level GLM Analysis Subject 3 First Level GLM Analysis Subject 4 First Level GLM Analysis Subject 1 Subject 2 CX CX CX CX Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Preprocessing MC, STC, B0 Smoothing Normalization Raw Data CX
37
37 Time Series Analysis Summary Correlational Design Matrix (HRF shape) Estimate HRF amplitude (Parameters) Contrasts to test hypotheses Results at each voxel: Contrast Value Contrast Value Variance p-value (Volume of Activation) Pass Contrast Value and Variance up to higher level analyses
38
38
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.