Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Planning & Conducting Investigations Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Planning & Conducting Investigations Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 Planning & Conducting Investigations Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013

2 A complaint arrives on your desk. What do you do now?

3 Steps in Conducting an Investigation 1. Develop a theory of the case. 2. Identify sources of information. 3. Interview witnesses. 4. Request documents and data. 5. Organize and assess the evidence. 6. Determine whether there is a violation of law.

4 Step 1 Develop a Theory of the Case Review the complaint and all public information. Identify possible legal theories. List elements of proof and facts needed to establish each element of a legal theory. Think about likely economic harm to competition. Consider possible justifications & defenses. Identify possible remedies.

5 The Law Elements of Proof Facts Is There a Violation of the Law? Investigative Techniques for Finding the Facts

6 Elements of Proof for Abuse of Dominance 1.A dominant position: –Relevant market –High market share 2.Conduct to acquire or maintain the dominant position that is unreasonable 3.No legitimate business justification 4.Anticompetitive effects

7 Purpose of Investigation: Find Facts to Prove or Disprove the Theory of the Case Elements Facts 1.Dominant Position ??? 2.Conduct to Acquire or Maintain ??? 3.No Legitimate Business Justification ??? 4. Anticompetitive Effects ???

8 Step 2 Identify Sources of Information Witnesses Documents & Data Government Sources Public Sources Related Investigations Others?

9 Step 3 Interview Witnesses Purpose: To learn facts needed to prove or disprove the elements of the violation under investigation. Types of Witnesses to Interview: –Complainant –Competitors –Customers –Suppliers, Distributors & Retailers –Government Agencies –Business/Trade Organizations –Industry Experts, Analysts, and Academics –Target

10 Step 4 Request Documents & Data Purpose: To learn facts needed to prove or disprove the elements of the violation under investigation. Methods for Getting Documents & Data – Voluntary requests Letters, telephone calls –Compulsory requests Subpoenas, CIDs, Second Requests

11 Sources of Documents Complainant Competitors Customers Suppliers, Distributors & Retailers Government Agencies Business/Trade Organizations Industry Experts, Analysts Target

12 Types of Document to Seek The contract or agreement at issue. Company formation documents. Company organizational charts. Company financial reports. Business, marketing, and strategic plans. Customer, supplier, and competitor lists. Sales, production, and market share data. Records of meetings.

13 Reviewing Documents Check for completeness and compliance with request. Review for: –Facts that help prove or disprove the theory of the case. –Background information about the industry, companies, competitors, and customers. –Things that are not clear and require follow-up questioning of a witness. –Other potential sources of relevant information. Organize documents by date, issue, witness.

14 Sequence for Gathering Information Complainant Documents Witness Interviews Target

15 Step 5 Organize and Assess the Evidence Organize the investigative files: –Correspondence –Documents & document requests –Interview reports –Witness files –Memoranda, legal research & notes Develop a chronology. Prepare a proof checklist.

16 Proof Checklist ELEMENTEVIDENCESOURCE 1. Dominant Position 2. Conduct 3. No Justification 4. Competitive Effects Abuse of Dominance

17 Assessing the Evidence Is there sufficient evidence to establish each element of proof? Is the evidence likely to be admissible? –Personal knowledge –Non-hearsay or hearsay exception How strong is the evidence? – Credibility of the witnesses – Consistency & completeness of the story The investigative process should continue until there is enough evidence to confidently support or reject the theory of the case.

18 Step 6 Determine Whether there Is a Law Violation Does the “story” of the case satisfy the following: It’s about people who have reasons for how they act. It accounts for all of the “facts beyond change.” It consists of admissible evidence, told by credible witnesses, and supported by the documents & data. It accords with common sense. It includes all of the elements of proof of a legally cognizable violation of the law.

19 Develop a Theory Interview Witnesses Analyze the EvidenceIdentify Sources Request Documents The Investigative Process


Download ppt "Planning & Conducting Investigations Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google