1. Living in Groups

2. By living in groups, many animals incur the cost of increased competition with their conspecifics And theory predicts that animals should distribute themselves to maximize resources and reduce agonistic competitive interactions

3. Herds, Flocks, and Schools But yet many animals occur in groups

4. So why live in a group? Predator Avoidance Foraging Advantage

5. Predator Avoidance Dilution Theory You don’t have to out swim the shark, you just have to out swim your friend!

6. Dilution Effect This advantage is true so long as – Attack rate does not increase proportionately with group size Do you think this is true? No, attack rate usually increases with group size

7. Dilution Effect This advantage is true so long as – Attack rate does not increase proportionately with group size Number of water skaters in group Attacks per individual Predicted based on dilution Observed In a group of 100 individuals, an individual suffers 1/100 th the attack rate compared to being alone

8. Predator Avoidance: Swamping Predator Swamping is another example of the dilution effect

9. Predator Avoidance Reproductive Synchrony

10. Predator Avoidance: Reproductive Synchrony Some estuarine crab species release their larvae at night time high tides to avoid planktivorous fishes

11. Predator Avoidance Animals maintain groups to benefit themselves as individuals – Position within the group is also important and animals often vie for the safest position Selfish herd theory Sheep with backpacks

12. Selfish herd: domains of danger

13. Predator Avoidance Selfish herd theory – Cape fur seals and Great White Sharks – Air Jaws Air Jaws Towed different arrangements of 4-5 decoys behind a boat – Presented the prey in different domains of danger Examined predation on seal position

14. Selfish Herd Theory Domain of danger was higher for attacked decoys Positive correlation between the size of the domain of danger and the relative predation risk

15. Selfish Herd Do alarmed individuals seek safety amongst companions? – Dace and Minnows Shoals of dace were habituated to the scent of injured conspecifics, naïve minnows added to shoal

16. Selfish Herd But group position is also likely a trade-off – Inside the group is the safest from predators But also least likely to encounter food first Or to intercept any information from outside the group

17. Predator Avoidance Confusion Effect – Groups of prey confuse predators because predators cannot focus on an individual – Schools of Fish in the Andaman Sea Schools of Fish in the Andaman Sea

18. Confusion Effect Neil and Cullen (1974) – Tested hunting behavior of 4 different types of animals with increasing fish shoal size

19. Predator Defense Communal Defense- prey will group together to mob and attack predators and enhance their defense

20. Predator Defense Black headed Gulls- Larus ridibundus Mobbing behavior

21. Improved Vigilance Animals also can spend less time being vigilant (searching for predators) when in groups

23. Improved Vigilance Do minnows respond to another minnow’s alarm response?

24. Vigilance and Cheating This group safety effect may also promote cheating Why bother looking up, your buddies have got it right?

25. Vigilance and Cheating But if everyone cheats, there is little vigilance So a stable strategy must be achieved to balance the vigilance of the group

26. Vigilance and Cheating But, it’s also important to pay attention – Predators may be less likely to attack a vigilant individual – Noticing the danger first gives you a few extra seconds to flee or avoid predators

27. Groups and Foraging Predators can improve their prey capture rate by hunting in groups Dolphins in Savannah, Ga Dolphins corralling fish

28. Foraging in Groups

29. How does group living evolve? C.P Haskins moved 200 guppies from a predator rich system to almost predator free head waters in another river system – 30 years after, guppies were collected from several streams (including the original and head water introduction site)

30. Shoaling in guppies reduced predation at a cost Selection for increased shoaling decreases competitiveness for food How does group living evolve?

31. Optimality and Group Size The costs and benefits of a group are likely to vary with its size But even if there is an optimum size is it stable? Group Size Benefits – Costs (Gain)

32. Optimality and Group Size Imagine a group whose optimum size is 6, but since groups can be more advantageous than being alone, they can keep joining – At some point, it may be better to be alone

33. As long as the benefit of joining a group > being alone, animals will join a group Group Size 1612 Individual Net Benefit Optimality and Group Size

34. Groups and Skew Theory Competitive differences in animals are likely to affect their benefits derived from a group Skew Theory- subordinate individuals will put up with lower pay offs so long as they do not increase their net benefits by going elsewhere – Examined through individual reproductive success

35. Dominant individuals may control group reproduction – Or subordinates may get a share How is group size maintained despite a skew in benefits? Groups and Skew Theory

36. Skew Theory and Coral Reef Fish Many shoaling coral reef fish form dominance hierarchies within their groups – Only the largest individuals breed Observation in gobies that subordinates tended to be 90-95% of the lengths of the next sized fish in the hierarchy – Results in a stepped size gradient

37. As gobies reach the next step in length (dominance), their growth rate slows – Cause: to prevent eviction! Groups and Skew Theory

38. Schooling in Fishes Shoals or schools of fish are made up of various individuals that are all consistently shifting position If fishes are all acting independently, how do they decide which way to go as a group? – Simple decision rules Simple decision rules

39. Zone of repulsion Zone of orientation Zone of attraction Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002

40. Collective Behaviors

41. Couzin et al. 2002 individual

42. Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002 individual

43. Couzin et al. 2002 Collective Behaviors individual

44. parameters Couzin et al. 2002 Collective Behaviors

45. Modeling fish movements Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002

46. ZOO WeakenedZOO Strengthened Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002

47. Waves of prey moving away from a predator are caused by a few prey sighting the predator and then moving into other fishes ZOR- results in ripple of movement across the shoal Predators attack a bait ball Simulation Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002

48. Predatory fish have eyes that face more forward creating a blind spot As a result, fish follow each other resulting in a torus shoal or milling Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002

49. Collective Behaviors Couzin et al. 2002