Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJulius Oliver Modified over 8 years ago
1
M&M Evaluation 2010 Housing Justice’s pilot mentoring and befriending project
2
Project Aim …To test and develop the contribution that formal befriending schemes can make to ending rough sleeping by supporting current and former rough sleepers…
3
Project Outcomes To improve clients’ confidence, motivation, social networks, mental well-being and use of time To increase the skills of volunteers to become befrienders and mentors To encourage the development of further volunteering and befriending schemes To continuously improve the quality of the scheme
4
Method 12 month project Jan - Dec 2010 worked with 4 night shelters Kingston, Islington, Barnet, Lambeth & Southwark 93 people attended mentoring trainings
5
Method clients choose if they want a mentor (goal focus) or befriender (social) assessment and goal setting using Outcomes Star mentors and mentees meet for 1-2 hours/ week for 6 months meeting in a public place
6
Support introductory 3-way meeting coordinator calls both parties to check in group supervision for mentors (twice in 6 months) midway 3-way meeting closing meeting closing tea party for all mentors and mentees
7
Resource pack & forum resource pack written for night shelters interested in starting their own mentoring or befriending project forum for agencies interested or already running mentoring or befriending with homeless
8
Mentors & Mentees… 17 successful relationships - lasted 6 mths 5 relationships didn’t work out referrals from shelters and agencies living in private rented accommodation, supported housing, sheltered housing or homeless
9
M&M clients age: 22 – 64 2 female / 15 male African 7 British 7 E. European 2 Bangladeshi 1
10
Evaluation method A pre and post Outcome Star carried out on 14 clients Semi structured interview conducted on 14 clients and on 18 volunteers
11
Mentee expectations help finding work (paid or voluntary) increase confidence increase social network English practice face up to underlying addiction
12
Baseline data Areas weakest at project outset: emotional & mental health meaningful use of time social networks managing money
13
Areas of greatest improvement meaningful use of time - up 2 pts emotional and mental health - up 1.5 pts social network and relationships - up 1pt
14
Areas of greatest improvement measured by interview with mentees
15
Areas of no or little change Living skills Substance use Managing tenancy Physical health Offending
16
Practical changes 3 mentees in Ready to Work Plact. 2 in work 1 mentee in work through A4E 2 mentees found work independently 1 applied to Legacy Programme for leave to remain
17
Practical changes – ctd… 1 resumed creative writing 1 linked into elderly social club 1 opened bank account 2 dealing with alcohol addiction
18
Cost £36,000direct project costs £2,100per relationship £24 - 26k cost per year of a homelessness episode http://www.homeless.org.uk/costs-homelessness
19
Recommendations funding beyond 1 year cycle to allow for two cycles of mentoring per year increased capacity building for shelters and other agencies to start their own M&B project
20
Recommendations – ctd… only accept clients with low support needs continue learning through M&M /pilot with day centres
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.