Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrianne Alannah Harrison Modified over 8 years ago
1
A New Order for Open Source Licenses and Licensing Tony Gaughan SVP Development.
2
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. Why not use an existing license? Each license addresses specific issues of author Additional use and flexibility not requirements Mozilla Public License: -only names Netscape or Mozilla as contributors -jurisdiction for legal disputes is Santa Clara, CA!
3
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. GPL and LGPL Issues GPL: Seen as “viral” by ISVs Does not allow integration with closed source No thought of commercial vendors’ IP issues LGPL: Allows embedding, but requires everything be LGPL Such licensing restrictions can discourage innovation
4
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. CA Trusted Open Source License Created as a last resort Updated and consolidated: -Apple Public Source License -Sun Public License -Common Public License Added additional provisions File-based -can be combined with other licenses Open Source Initiative (OSI) approved -meets requirements of the Open Source Definition -arduous and lengthy process
5
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. CA Trusted Open Source License Goals: -strengthen the protection for open source developers -enable better interaction for commercial works -indemnification for explicit patents and the product(s) to discourage patent litigation -grant back of intellectual property for redistribution -redistribute executables under another license Ingres r3 released under CATOSL
6
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. CA Views on CATOSL Important: Other open source projects available under their original licenses in conjunction with CATOSL -Examples: Xerces and Oracle Cluster File System retain their respective licenses within Ingres Problem: Customer is faced with multiple licenses when they get Ingres r3 We feel that in of itself leads to confusion for customers
7
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. The Issue Today CA did not want to write a new license Sun CDDL is a great start in stopping proliferation HP proposal to stop duplicate licenses is administrative – not a practical solution The OSI license list needs to be pruned (or eliminated!) We need legal tests of the existing licenses The better solution: Template licenses
8
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. New Template Licenses The ten criteria defined by Bruce Perens in the Open Source Definition (OSD) is the right approach But: -Multiple licenses create incompatibilities among projects -Can unwittingly hamper code sharing Solution: Open source licenses must allow new provisions to be added as specific requirements come to light
9
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. The New Manifesto The L.A. Law / Boston Legal problem (amateur lawyers slowing progress) (TONY – ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THIS) Open source is universal, the licenses must be international -patent, trademarks and copyright are limited to the US We need one solid license with solid standard provisions GPL: does not allow mixed heritage; needs revision in 3.0
10
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. The New Manifesto (Cont…) Create small set of open source licenses, such as: -GPL 3.0 -“Commercial” Licenses -Education License Have knowledgeable attorneys draft these licenses: -Generic -Easily modified without need for new license OSI: -current License Owners must adopt revisions -switching licenses for some projects is mammoth task -new standards beyond the OSD Definitions
11
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. The Future (Need to Act Today!) Patent non-enforcement to prevent unwarranted litigation Retire boutique licenses in favor of template -CA will change licenses from CATOSL when a new standard emerges International open source licenses Don’t hamper community work with legal issues Drive OSDL to take more active role
12
© 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies. Summary This is not an easy problem Unless its fixed we will be countries, each with its own constitution, not ready to join a global community It STARTS today – the people in this room will make the difference!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.