Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJustina Wright Modified over 8 years ago
1
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 1 MS 401 Production and Service Systems Operations Spring 2009-2010 Inventory Control – I Deterministic Demand: EOQ Model Slide Set #3
2
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi Office Hours Ceyda Sol: Thursday 14:00-15:30 Özlem Çoban: Wednesday 15:00-16:30 Mahir Umman Yıldırım: Monday 14:30-16:00 The assistants' office hours will be conducted at L068, unless announced otherwise Murat Kaya: Tuesday 14:40-15:40, Thursday 13:40-14:40, Office: G020 2
3
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi Whom to Email? The Coordinators Each graduate assistant coordinates some aspect of the course. Please email the assistants on administrative issues before emailing the instructor (Dr. Kaya). Your questions should be directed as follows: Assignment-related questions to CEYDA Project-related questions to OZLEM Recitation and Exam-related questions to MAHIR (including make-up exam issues) 3
4
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 4 Some Basic Definitions An inventory is an accumulation of a commodity that will be used to satisfy some future demand. Inventories may be of the following form: - raw material - components (subassemblies) - work-in-process - finished goods - spare parts - pipeline
5
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 5 Total Investment in Inventories in US (1999) Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
6
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 6 Motivation for Holding Inventories
7
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 7 Characteristics of Inventory Systems 1.Demand constant versus variable known versus uncertain 2.Replenishment lead time 3.Review periodic or continuous 4.Replenishment periodic or continuous 5.Excess demand –backordered or lost 5.Changing Inventory perishability or obsolescence
8
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 8 Cost Structure Order costs –fixed (Set-up cost, K) –variable, per-unit (c) Holding costs (h) – – – – Penalty cost (p) –if backordering allowed: loss of goodwill –if demand lost: loss of goodwill + loss of profit
9
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 9 Inventory Turnover Ratios for Different Industries IndustryUpper quartileMedianLower quartile Electronic components and accessories 8.14.93.3 Electronic computers 22.77.02.7 Household audio and video equipment 6.33.92.5 Paper Mills 11.78.05.5 Industrial chemicals 14.16.44.2 Bakery products 39.723.012.6 Books: Publishing and printing 7.22.81.5
10
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model 10
11
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 11 Assumptions Leading to EOQ Demand rate, λ, is constant and deterministic over time (units/day, units/year, etc.) Shortages not permitted No replenishment lead time The cost structure includes –fixed ordering cost, K, per order placed –unit variable cost, c, independent of order size (no discounts) –holding cost, h Infinite planning horizon
12
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 12 Why EOQ ? Easy to compute Does not require data that is hard to obtain Policies are surprisingly robust Assumptions can be relaxed Gives a good overall idea Can be starting point for more complicated models
13
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 13 Recall the notation we introduced earlier: Q = order quantity (we want to find the optimal Q) K = fixed order cost c = unit variable cost, $ / unit h = holding cost, $ / (unit * (unit time)), h= I c λ = demand rate, units / (unit time) EOQ - Notation
14
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 14 Our aim is to determine the best replenishment strategy (when and how much to order) under the criterion that the relevant costs (order and holding costs) will be minimized over time The Objective
15
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 15 “When” should we place a new order ? –assume zero starting inventory –demand is deterministic and at a constant rate –lead time is negligible –no backorders are allowed EOQ Model - Intuition
16
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 16 “How much” we have to order each time ? –parameters do not change over time –there is no reason for ordering different quantities –so, order the same quantity Q in each order EOQ Model - Intuition
17
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 17 Decision Variable: Q, the order size T Economic Order Quantity Model Time Q Inventory Slope= -λ
18
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 18 The same picture occurs over and over again –why? –any one of the triangles will be called a “cycle” Why not minimize the total cost in a cycle? – Minimize the average cost per unit time (annual cost) Convert the order and holding costs to “average annual cost”, using the total cost in a cycle Deriving the EOQ: The “Cycle”
19
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 19 Cycle length T =Q / λ (slope, - λ, = -Q/T) Since Q / λ is the time between two orders (the cycle time), λ /Q is the number of orders per unit time In each order, we pay K+Qc Order cost per unit time = Deriving the EOQ: The Order Cost
20
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 20 Deriving the EOQ: The Holding Cost Holding cost per unit time = This can also be calculated as
21
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 21 Deriving the EOQ = I c
22
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 22 Q G(Q) Q*Q* Annual fixed ordering and holding cost The Average Annual Cost Curve The minimum
23
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 23 An Example Suppose that you are working for a retail store and have to determine how many boxes of detergent to order. Suppose every time you make an order you pay $20 for transportation and $10 to prepare the ordering request. Suppose every dollar tied in the inventory would earn 10 cents annually, if you had invested it. Suppose there is a regular weekly demand of 20 boxes and each box costs you $10. What is the order quantity? What is the trade-off here?
24
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 24 λ=20*52 = 1040 boxes annually K (fixed ordering cost) = $30 each time h (holding cost) Q*= T: cycle length = Annual holding cost = Annual fixed ordering cost = Solution
25
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi 25 Turnover Ratio: A measure of effective inventory control –“how many times I sold my inventory?” Inventory Turnover Ratio with EOQ Model
26
Murat Kaya, Sabancı Üniversitesi EOQ in a Production Environment So far we have discussed a case in which we “order” from an outside supplier If we produce in-house, the relevant problem is called the “Economic Production Quantity” In this case, K denotes the “setup cost” Why do we have a setup cost? Examples include: –cost of production setup independent of the number produced: heating an oven, cost of dyes etc –time required for the setup: lost production! –first few units might need to be scrapped 26
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.