1. HIGHLIGHTS IN 2011 AT STAR & ALICE In-Kwon Yoo

2. Outline  STAR BES Results  BES runs and STAR general  Charged Meson   and   Freeze-out Conditions    Flow  E-by-E  ALICE Recent Results  ALICE general  Particle Production  RHIC vs. LHC  Freeze-out Volume  Particle Ratios  Flow  Jet Quenching  Miscellaneous.. 2 IKYoo for HIM

3. STAR BES  Beam Energy Scan  Signature of Onset  Critical Point  T-mB scan  Looking for  anomalies  testing theories  RHIC vs. LHC 3 IKYoo for HIM

4. 4

5. PID at STAR 5 IKYoo for HIM

6. K/ , ,  vs. E CM 6  Excellent agreement with SPS results IKYoo for HIM

7. Freeze-Out Conditions 7  Statistical model fit to , K, p  Excellent agreements with pub.data  Clear centrality dependence of T IKYoo for HIM

8.   KK 8  R CP in E CM dependence   /K ratio vs. theories IKYoo for HIM

9. Flow (v 2 ) of Charged Hadrons 9 IKYoo for HIM

10. Integrated v 2 vs. E CM 10  BES results fill gap between NA49 and 200GeV/u IKYoo for HIM

11. Particle – Antiparticle v2 11 IKYoo for HIM

12. Particle – Antiparticle v2 12 IKYoo for HIM

13. v 2 /ncq scaling 13  ncq-scaling for all particles holds up to 7.7 GeV   -meson results deviates from others at 11.5 GeV IKYoo for HIM

14. K(p)/  E-by-E fluctuations 14   (p/  ): monotonic increase  s(K/p): almost constant ; disagree with NA49 IKYoo for HIM

15. 15

16. 16 IKYoo for HIM

17. ALICE Data 17 IKYoo for HIM

18. Particle Production in pp/PbPb 18 IKYoo for HIM

19. RHIC vs. LHC 19  The same experiment under vastly different conditions IKYoo for HIM

20. System-size dependence vs. Theories 20  identical variation of particle production with system-size at RHIC and LHC  Global features of the system : independent on collision Energy IKYoo for HIM

21. Freeze-out Volume : Source-size 21 IKYoo for HIM

22. Identified particle spectra 22  much harder spectra  inv.slope parameter  expanding T IKYoo for HIM

23. Particle Ratios vs. Thermal model 23 Similar temperature as at RHIC, T CH ~ 164MeV IKYoo for HIM

24. Elliptic flows 24 mass dependence due to the radial flow viscous hydro predictions describe the data similar to RHIC : hydro+UrQMD (rescattering) for antiproton IKYoo for HIM

25. Jet quenching 25 IKYoo for HIM

26. RAA in- vs. out-of-plane 26 IKYoo for HIM

27. Flavor dependence 27 IKYoo for HIM

28. Flavor dependence 28 IKYoo for HIM

29. J/Psi RAA 29 Contribution from B is not substracted ; Cold nuclear matter effect at RHIC vs. LHC ; pA@LHC needed IKYoo for HIM

30. UPC with ALICE 30 IKYoo for HIM

31. UPC with ALICE 31 IKYoo for HIM

32. UPC with ALICE 32 IKYoo for HIM

33. Anti-Alpha with ALICE 33 IKYoo for HIM

34. Conclusions and Outlook 34  Excellent agreements of STAR BES results with NA49  Scanning and Filling up the gap between SPS and RHIC  Even more strongly interacting matter at LHC than RHIC?  Rich data with high precisions and PID to be continued  pA program at LHC?  What to be expected at 5.5TeV in 2014? IKYoo for HIM