Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHortense Jordan Modified over 9 years ago
3
KEY ASPECTS Proposed Budget should be Based on Solid Rationale reflecting an efficient & effective use of proposed investment as well as the existing resources Should be accompanied by Strong Arguments & Justifications of Needs Should Consider the Institutional Commitment & Capacity in Proposing the Budget, and NOT Merely Based on Max Grant Size
4
ROUND 1 – MAX GRANT SIZE
6
DISTRIBUTION AMONG ENTITIES Different Entities of the University will Get a Share of the UDG allocated to each university proposal should indicate the distribution of funds among different entities of the university using Table C Recommended that the beneficiary population and the needs of the new and/or under developed faculties/units/centres be considered
7
Table C. Budget Distribution among Different Entities (p.12)
8
DISTRIBUTION AMONG ACTIVITIES Rational Fund Distribution Across 4 eligible Activities should be ensured Following Thresholds should be adhered to, in preparation of the budget
9
ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURE GOODS WORKS CONSULTANCIES OTHER SERVICES
10
GOODS Upgrading Laboratories Modernizing Teaching & Learning Equipment Procuring New Equipment EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE, BOOKS, JOURNALS, SOFTWARE etc.
11
GOODS Procurement of Teaching Aids Textbooks & other related Learning Materials (e.g. journals, magazines, software/CDs etc.) Furniture for classroom, laboratory & student learning purposes Budget for GOODS 60% of Total Budget
12
WORKS Limited to Renovation or Expansion/ Upgrading of Existing Physical Facilities Purchase of Land & Construction of New Buildings – NOT eligible Budget for (GOODS + WORKS) 90% of Total Budget Budget for WORKS 40% of Total Budget
13
CONSULTANCIES International & Domestic Consultancies to Assist in Planning & Strategy Development for Curriculum Development for Other Academic Activities that Directly Benefit the Programs offered by the university Budget for CONSULTANCIES 20% of Total Budget
14
OTHER SERVICES Workshops/Seminars/Guest Lectures for Students & Staff Local Study Tours/Field Visits/Excursions for Students Health Education/Student Counseling Programs Cultural/Sports & other Extra Curricular Activities Staff and Student Exchange Programs Field Trips
15
OTHER SERVICES Long-Term (> 3 months) Staff Development Activities - NOT Eligible Domestic Short-Term (< 3 months) Training Activities Directly Relevant to the Sub-Project - Eligible Budget for OTHER SERVICES 20% of Total Budget
16
MAX FOR COST COMPONENTS
17
Table B. Proposed Budget (p.12)
20
CLASSIFICATION OUPUT/OUTCOME PROCESS INPUT what universities start with Students Staff Facilities what universities do with inputs Curricula Teaching & Learning Staff Workload Use of Technology Staff/Student Ratio achievements & value-added effects on students Skills Attitudes Behaviour Employment Income
21
Table D. Performance Indicators (p.13)
23
English Language Skills
24
IT Skills
25
HETC – OVERALL OUTCOME INDICATORS
30
END NOTE PIs which are abstract or based on complex formulae are not easily interpreted. Simplicity is a virtue and PIs should be transparent and have a good face validity No of PIs should be kept to minimum, otherwise data collection tends to become an end in itself
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.