Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJob Walsh Modified over 9 years ago
1
ENUM Validation Architecture & Token Format draft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-00.txt Axel Mayrhofer, Otmar Lendl enum.at GmbH Michael Haberler Internet Foundation Austria
2
overview sources of validation information goals + setup options architecture token format contents
3
sources of validation information sourcecase countlikelihood of participation quality service provider (ITSP/Telco) potentially highinitially low+ porting process/NPAC varyinghigh+ user (direct assignment) lowhigh+ directory assistance operators highconceivable+/- dedicated validation SP lowhigh-.. ++ centralized validation agency high ? / cost!!
4
goals prove the registrant‘s right-to-use in the number efficient process in common cases –be easy on incumbents or they‘ll never bite allow for consumer choice –enable ENUM service provision even if NRH is not cooperating avoid the next monopoly allow for many sources of validation information –may the best method win dont tilt new versus existing number use
5
setup options 1.centralized validation agent this is the next monopoly inefficient on service providers – they know their customers already 2.multiple validation agents no monopoly, but still ineffective 3.number range holder = registrar „efficient“ on telcos, ITSP‘s might leave consumer behind conclusion: no single source works best so: define Validation Entity as a role VE might collapse with registrar – easy it might not: a chain of trust is required
6
architecture validation entity registrar registry registrar validation entity registrant validation entity delegation request validation request validation token registration + validation token
7
validation process requires a chain of trust registry VE –signing of token with XML-DSIG + certificate contract between VE and registry –assigns ID, describes method, trust chain open list of methods –regulatory requirement in +43 is by maximum failure rate only token lifetime determines the domain visibility token contents is an audit trail
8
token contents token MUST contain: –validation „serial number“ –e164 number –validation entity ID –method ID –registrar for whom validation was carried out –create, expiredate MAY contain –registrant identity: organisation commercial entity registration number title, firstname, lastname, address, streetname, streetnumber, apt,zip code, country, state phone, fax, email identity geared towards reuse of directory information as per ITU E.115 a superset of the hoeneisen-token
9
contacts Alexander Mayrhofer enum.at GmbH Phone: +43 1 5056416 34 alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at Otmar Lendl enum.at GmbH Phone: +43 1 5056416 33 otmar.lendl@enum.at otmar.lendl@enum.at Michael Haberler Internet Foundation Austria phone +43 664 4213465 mah@eunet.at mah@eunet.at registry specification, registrar manual, registrar toolkit, contracts available at www.enum.atwww.enum.at
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.