Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLenard Sutton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Steven L. Britton and Lauren Gerard Koch Functional Genomics Laboratory Medical College of Ohio Toledo, Ohio Genetic Models of Low and High Aerobic Capacity
2
Nature 291:381, 1981 From Alberts, et al, Molecular Biology of the Cell
3
Photosynthesis Created Atmospheric Oxygen (increased redox potential more free energy) Created a Permissive Environment for Evolution of Complex Aerobic Pathways Current Aerobic Capacity -3.5 Billion Years Evolutionary Time Aerobic Capacity Defines Much Of Our Biological Existence
4
Aerobic Capacity Cancer Diabetes Mellitus Heart Failure Aging Aerobic Capacity Has An Ubiquitous Influence (axiomatic from our evolutionary history)
5
Current Aerobic = Intrinsic + Adaptational Phenotype Sedentary, Untrained Response to Training Assumption
6
Model One: Artificial Selection for Intrinsic Aerobic Endurance Treadmill Running Capacity
7
From McCardle, Katch and Katch, 1996
9
Columbus Instruments four lane 1 2 3 4
10
treadmill shock grid 15 degrees RAT ENDURANCE RUN TO EXHAUSTION “Average” rat exhausted at 23 min
11
N:NIH Stock Has Wide Genetic Heterogeneity Created by outcrossing these 8 inbred strains Strains were estimated to differ widely MR (Maudsely Reactive) WN (Wistar Normotensive) WKY (Wistar Kyoto) M520 (Marshall) F344 (Fischer) ACI (August x Copenhagen) BN (Brown Norway) BUF (Buffalo) Originated by Carl Hansen and Karen Spuhler at the NIH in 1979. Maintained by the NIH as a resource (Carl Hansen). Founder Population Rats Were N:NIH Stock
12
Founder Population Running Capacity 205 m 167 m 633 m 541 m f Distance
13
0 5 10 15 20 25 0500100015002000 Founder Population n=168 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Generation 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Frequency Selection Across 10 Generations Meters Run at Exhaustion Generation 5 n=250 Generation 10 n=310
14
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 1234567891011 Generation Distance Run to Exhaustion (meters) HCR y = 37x + 540 r = 0.322 n = 1385 p < 0.001 LCR y = -17x + 388 r = 0.368 n = 1204 p < 0.001 317% Response to Selection
15
45 50 01002003004005006007008009001000 Distance Run to Exhaustion (m) Time (min) Ramped Running Protocol: Time Vs Distance Aerobic Lactate Threshold Exhaustion Founder Population Average Run duration = 23 min distance = 355 m speed = 21 m/min
16
45 50 01002003004005006007008009001000 Distance Run to Exhaustion (m) Time (min) Ramped Running Protocol: Time Vs Distance 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Founder Low High 217355 904
17
Male Female Low Capacity Gained and High Capacity Lost Weight )
18
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 168 Founders 26 Low Parents26 High Parents Thirteen LCR Families The entire parental DNA (II) architecture is archived
19
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 168 Founders 26 Low Parents26 High Parents Thirteen HCR Families The entire parental DNA (II) architecture is archived
20
Likely Determinant Phenotype HCR are higher than LCR for: 1. Isolated Cardiac Output (John Barbato). 2. Cardiac left ventricular myosin ATPase activity (John Barbato). 3. Cardiac left ventricular Na + /K + ATPase (Joseph Shapiro). 4. Stress Proteins (HSP 70 inducible) in heart and skeletal muscle (Ed Sanchez and Todd Brickman).
22
Other Selectivley-Bred Models in Development 1. Adaptational response to endurance training 2. Sensorimotor capacity (coordination) Long-term, we want to make these models available for others to study. [The NIH has provided resources to make the Intrinsic Aerobic Rats available for small-scale studies].
23
We have collaborations with 10 institutions, but no formal, systematic plans for studying these models. Pennington Bouchard UCSDWagner U KansasGonzales Laval (Can.)St. Amand Yale Neuffer U. NorwayU. Wisloff UCSF T. Kurtz Copenhagen T. Clausen MayoE. Ritman USDAL. Klevay
24
End
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.