Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SubmissionKwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel1 Link Quality Strawpole Joe Kwak/Brian Johnson doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SubmissionKwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel1 Link Quality Strawpole Joe Kwak/Brian Johnson doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003."— Presentation transcript:

1 SubmissionKwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel1 Link Quality Strawpole Joe Kwak/Brian Johnson doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003

2 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 2 Purpose TGk has several different proposals for new Link Quality Indicator. TGk members have widely varying opinions on each proposal. Progress may be accelerated with better understanding of group opinions. This series of strawpole questions is designed to provide direction to contributors to continue this work.

3 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 3 Link Quality Question #1 Does TGk need a QUANTITATIVE link quality indicator? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

4 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 4 Link Quality Question #2 Is a “black box” specification preferred over a detailed functional, “how-to” specification which mandates a certain implementation? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

5 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 5 Link Quality Question #3 If TGk decides to specify HOW to implement a quality indicator, is EVM the best basis for an implementation spec? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

6 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 6 Link Quality Question #4 Is a tabular performance specification (specifying indicator performance at limited number of points) adequate? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

7 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 7 Link Quality Question #5 Should the link quality indicator accurately reflect output quality in both AWGN and fading conditions (using variance adjustment or equivalent)? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

8 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 8 Link Quality Question #6 Would members support a link quality measurement based on OFDM pilot tones? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

9 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 9 Link Quality Question #7 Would members support, as mandatory, any signal quality spec that will likely require a silicon revision to claim 11k compliance? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

10 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 10 Link Quality Question #8 Would members support, as optional, a signal quality spec that will likely require a silicon revision to claim 11k compliance? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

11 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 11 Link Quality Question #9 Would members support reserving and defining the required bit fields for a future signal quality measurement that could be defined as mandatory in TGn? YES _______ NO _______ ABSTAIN _______

12 doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003 Submission Kwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel 12 Other Key Questions? Are there other similar questions which we should poll to better determine direction for this work??


Download ppt "SubmissionKwak/Johnson, InterDigital/Nortel1 Link Quality Strawpole Joe Kwak/Brian Johnson doc: IEEE 802.11-03/970r0November 2003."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google