Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

National Senior Certificate Examinations - 2012 Presentation to Portfolio Committee 12 February 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "National Senior Certificate Examinations - 2012 Presentation to Portfolio Committee 12 February 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 National Senior Certificate Examinations - 2012 Presentation to Portfolio Committee
12 February 2013

2 Presentation Outline Introduction Overall systemic improvements
Quality improvements Lessons from Standardisation Diagnostic subject analysis Interventions Qualification challenges Umalusi Concerns Conclusion

3 Introduction

4 Introduction The education enterprise is a complex activity which is multifaceted and dependent on a host of intervening variables. The outcome of the NSC examination is the most important indicator of the performance of the system. The NSC as a qualification has been implemented for the last five years Therefore it is appropriate to reflect on the NSC: - as a qualification - learner performance

5 Introduction The national curriculum has established itself over the past five years: Teachers have adjusted to the national curriculum standards Remediation programmes have yielded steady improvements Improved allocation of resources to schools Ongoing provision of professional support to educators and administrators Established processes, policies and practices in the national examination and assessment system Teachers, subject advisors and the examining panels have come to grips with the national curriculum and its associated assessment

6 The Class of 2012 Entered Grade 1 in 2001.
Born in the year when the new democratic dispensation was ushered in. Education systems and processes were fairly stable. Exposed to implementation of new curriculum

7 Introduction Action Plan 2014, Towards Schooling 2025, sets specific targets: Increase the number of learners eligible for bachelors study. Increase the number of Grade 12 learners who pass Mathematics Increase the number of learners who pass Physical Science

8 Overall Systemic Improvements

9 NSC performance: 2008 to 2012

10 Province Total Wrote Total Achieved % Achieved Ranking % Achieved in 2011 % Achieved Difference EASTERN CAPE 63 989 39 443 61.6 9 58.1 3.5 FREE STATE 24 265 19 676 81.1 3 75.7 5.4 GAUTENG 89 627 75 214 83.9 1 2.8 KWAZULU-NATAL 93 003 73.1 6 68.1 5.0 LIMPOPO 77 360 51 745 66.9 8 63.9 3.0 MPUMALANGA 47 889 33 504 70.0 7 64.8 5.2 NORTH WEST 27 174 21 609 79.5 4 77.8 1.7 NORTHERN CAPE 8 925 6 661 74.6 5 68.8 5.9 WESTERN CAPE 44 670 36 974 82.8 2 82.9 -0.1 NATIONAL 73.9 70.2 3.7

11 2012 NSC passes by type of qualification
Province Total Wrote Achieved Bachelor % achieved Bachelor achieved Diploma % achieved Diploma Achieved Higher Certificate % achieved Higher Certificate Achieved NSC % achieved NSC EC 63 989 11 246 17.6 16 148 25.2 11 998 18.8 51 0.1 FS 24 265 6 937 28.6 8 553 35.2 4 181 17.2 5 0.0 GP 89 627 32 449 36.2 30 422 33.9 12 335 13.8 8 KZN 34 779 27.3 36 841 29.0 21 274 16.7 109 LP 77 360 15 324 19.8 20 103 26.0 16 301 21.1 17 MP 47 889 9 495 14 277 29.8 9 633 20.1 99 0.2 NW 27 174 7 445 27.4 9 151 33.7 5 010 18.4 3 NC 8 925 2 055 23.0 2 787 31.2 1 819 20.4 WC 44 670 16 317 36.5 14 599 32.7 6 053 13.6 National 26.6 29.9 88 604 17.3 297

12 Admission to Bachelor Studies (target of 32%)

13 Proportion of 22-25 year-olds with matric since 2002
Source: STATS SA General Household Surveys,

14 Achievement - Bachelor Studies
Sector on track to achieve target for 32% of Grade 12s able to be admitted for Bachelor degree studies (currently at 26,6% in 2012 from 24.3% in 2011 and 19.9% in 2008) Over 15, 000 increase year on year 2011 was low for historical reasons so growth in improvements of the order of 10% anticipated

15 Achievement Status per Quintile
Quintile None Totals Achieved Bachelor 16 296 19 752 25 252 18 497 46 795 9 253 202 Achieved Diploma 26 885 30 251 34 476 24 179 29 851 7 113 126 Achieved H-Cert 21 208 22 504 22 083 11 660 8 052 3 067 30 88 604 Achieved NSC 167 72 39 8 11 297 Total Achieved 64 556 72 579 81 850 54 344 84 698 19 444 358 Quintiles: 1 to 5 Lowest to highest ranked 99 Independent/Special/Private Schools None No Quintile not available

16 Number of candidates in schools per percentage interval per quintile
% Interval (Schools) Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 Total Exactly 0% 37 9 56 102 No with 0 to 19.9% 1 671 2 142 920 67 168 4 968 No with 20 to 39.9% 9 731 7 688 6 285 1 302 774 25 780 No with 40 to 59.9% 23 828 23 497 22 565 7 389 2 268 79 547 No with 60 to 79.9% 35 937 44 762 46 929 28 662 12 215 No with 80 to 100% 26 671 29 879 39 065 32 903 77 971 Exactly 100% 1 227 1 036 1 953 1 208 14 635 20 059 99 102 71 531

17 Candidates’ performance in selected subjects 2008 – 2012 (at 30% level)

18 Number of Districts per Percentage Interval – 2011 / 2012
Province Total number of Districts Below 50% 50% to 59.9% 60% to 69.9% 70% to 79.9% 80% and above 2011 2012 Eastern Cape 23 5 3 6 7 8 4 Free State 1 Gauteng 15 10 12 KwaZulu-Natal 9 Limpopo Mpumalanga 2 North West Northern Cape Western Cape Total 81 22 18 25 21 28

19 Quality Improvements

20 Quality Improvements Comparing the achievements of 2012 to that of 2011, the following is a confirmation of the improvement in quality: more bachelor passes Nine of the gateway subjects improved at 30% achievement level. Eight of the gateway subjects improved at the 40% achievement level. more candidates passed Mathematics (at 30%) more candidates passed Mathematics (at 40%) more candidates passed Physical Science (at 30%) 8 967 more candidates passed Physical Science (at 40%)

21 Quality Improvements Comparing the achievements of 2012 to that of 2011, the following is a confirmation of the improvement in quality: (h) Increase in the distinction rate across key subjects. (i) Of the 81 districts, only three performed below 50% (5 in 2011) (j) Number of districts performing above 80% increased from 21 to 28. (k) Gini coefficient decreased from to

22 Lessons from Standardisation

23 Standardisation of Results
Ensures that the cohort of learners is not advantaged or disadvantaged by fluctuations of results. Mitigates fluctuations of learner performance as a result of factors other than learner performance. Standardisation is based on comparing the performance of the current cohort with previous cohorts. Therefore, standardisation may reveal problems relating to: the standard of the question paper. the standard of the marking. poor subject performance.

24 Standardisation of Results
Year Subjects Raw marks Adjusted downwards Adjusted upwards 2010 58 39 10 9 2011 56 45 8 3 2012 61 44 12 5

25 Lessons Acceptance of the majority of the marks based on raw marks, points to the setting of question papers of the appropriate standard and confirms that the marking standards are in keeping with previous years. Downward adjustments based on the premise that: the question paper was possibly less challenging than previous years; or the improvement in the performance of candidates is justified, but too high for one year. Upward adjustments based on the premise that: the paper could have been more challenging than in previous years. learner performance of this cohort has deviated from previous years due to poor teaching and learning.

26 Lessons Downward Adjustments (12 subjects):
Accounting, Physical Sciences, Geography, Tourism, Design, Dramatic Arts, Civil technology, Electrical Technology, English First Additional Language, Xitsonga Home Language, Tshivenda Home language and Sesotho First Additional Language. These subjects will be closely scrutinised by the examiners to ensure that the appropriate standard is set in 2013. In terms of NSLA, this is a confirmation that the NSLA strategy is beginning to bear fruit in these subjects, and PEDs should be encouraged to continue with the interventions.

27 Lessons DBE will explore and develop a method of establishing the impact of these interventions so that the required evidence can be provided to Umalusi to inform the standardisation process and avoid the downward adjustment.

28 Lessons Upward Adjustments (5 subjects)
Life Sciences, English Home language, Afrikaans Home language, Isizulu Home Language and Mathematical Literacy. The examining panels will conduct a review of these papers to confirm if there were indeed of a higher standard These 5 subjects must be the focus of the NSLA in the current year, so as to improve performance in these subjects

29 Diagnostic subject Analysis

30 Purpose of Subject Analysis
Provides feedback to learning and teaching and assists in school based diagnostic assessment and intervention Communicate to teachers and subject advisors the common areas of weakness in the subject and ensures that these areas are constructively addressed in the teaching programme planned for 2013

31 Scope and Approach The report covers 11 of the subjects with high enrolments namely: Accounting, Mathematics, Physical Sciences, Agricultural Science, Business Studies, Economics, English First Additional Language, Geography, History, Life Sciences and Mathematical Literacy. Subject analysis based on: input provided by markers; analysis of a selected sample of scripts

32 Generic Improvements Improvement in the quality of answers provided, which confirms that improvement strategies are making a difference. Gradual consistent improvement in the pass rate in each of the subjects analysed both at the 30% and 40% achievement levels. Fewer candidates scoring between 0-29% in most of the subjects. Improved performance in Accounting and Physical Science was observed. Possibly due to an increase in the number of candidates who offered these subjects in combination with Mathematics

33 Generic Shortcomings Inadequacies relating to foundational knowledge and skills; and basic concepts and principles which negatively impact on advanced learning and understanding. Inadequate numerical skills required to do simple calculations in Mathematics as well as other subjects where numerical skills were assessed. Lack of linguistic skills: lack of appropriate language skills which are required to interpret questions and write proper paragraphs. Text based questions - poorly answered. Failure to apply knowledge and skills. Questions requiring application, higher order thinking skills like problem solving, analysis and evaluation registered the worst performance across all the subjects analysed. Inadequate preparedness of candidates for the examination, which manifested as a lack of mastery of content

34 Mathematics

35 There was a decrease in the percentage of candidates who performed at 0-29% in 2012 compared to 2011; An improvement in the number of candidates who performed at each of the categories from 40% and above.

36 Maths P1: Average marks per question expressed as a percentage
Content assessed Q1 Algebra, equations and inequalities Q2 Patterns and sequences Q3 Q4 Functions and graphs Q5 Q6 Q7 Annuities and finance Q8 Calculus Q9 Q10 Q11 Linear Programming

37 Maths P2: Average marks per question expressed as a percentage
Content assessed Q1 Data handling Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Analytical geometry Q6 Q7 Transformation geometry Q8 Trigonometry Q9 Q10 Trigonometry functions Q11 Q12 Q13

38 Key areas of Concern Proposed Interventions Poor understanding of the basics and foundational competencies taught in earlier grades such as Algebraic manipulations, factorisation, solutions of equations and inequalities. Focus on knowledge, skill and concepts taught in earlier grades. Learners should be first taught the concepts and question papers should be utilized for practice. Expose learners to non-routine questions more regularly. It is not possible to predict the nature of problem solving questions that will be assessed year on year, therefore regular exposure to non routine questions will assist in developing learners problem solving thinking skills. Learners should be exposed to a variety of questions, not just ‘stimulus-response’ questions, and not limited to those appearing in past question papers The following topics: Analytical geometry, trigonometric functions, calculus, functions and graphs need focused attention Over dependence and focus on previous papers without proper grounding and understanding of the concepts. Candidates therefore regurgitate answers to similar questions from previous papers. Q 10 on calculus, and Q 5 on functions and graphs in P1; Q 10 on Trigonometric functions in P2 registered the worst performance of 24% average nationally .

39 Accounting

40 In 2012, there was a decrease in the percentage of candidates who performed at 0-29% compared to An improvement in the number of candidates who performed at each of the categories from 40% and above.

41 Average marks per question expressed as a percentage
Content assessed Q1 Inventories and VAT Q2 Bank reconciliation and debtors’ age analysis Q3 Manufacturing Q4 Company financial statements and fixed assets Q5 Interpretation of company information Q6 Projected income statement and internal control

42 Key areas of Concern Proposed Interventions Lack of proper understanding of basic accounting concepts, basic formats for cash flow and balance sheets Knowledge and understanding of the basic formats used in Accounting forms the basis of all Accounting and should be focused on by teachers. Basic theory and basic formats possibly not covered or not well taught, as candidates responses lacked mastery Curriculum coverage needs to be closely monitored Question 2 on Bank Reconciliation and debtors analysis registered the least average performance (this topic is taught in grade 11 ) Revision of relevant Grades 10 and 11 content required for examinations in grade 12 Q6 on projected income statement and internal control also noted poor performance. Preparation of cash budgets, projected income statements, and interpretation thereof needs focus

43 Physical Sciences

44 General improvement in performance in Physical Science in 2012 compared to 2011 .

45 Physical Sc. P1: Average marks in each question expressed as a percentage
Content assessed Q1 One word items Q2 Multiple choice questions Q3 Vertical projectile motion Q4 Momentum and relative velocity Q5 Work and energy Q6 Doppler Effect Q7 2D and 3D wave fronts Q8 Parallel plate capacitors and electric fields Q9 Electric Circuits Q10 AC circuits Q11 Photo-electric effect

46 Physical Sc . P2: Average marks per question expressed as a percentage
Content assessed Q1 One-Word Items Q2 Multiple Choice Q3 Nonmenclature of organic compounds Q4 Physical properties of organic compounds Q5 Reactions of organic compounds Q6 Rate of reaction Q7 Chemical equilibrium Q8 Galvanic cells Q9 Electrolyctic cells Q10 Batteries Q11 Fertilisers

47 Key areas of Concern Proposed Interventions Some centres performed really well and others displayed a serious lack of knowledge which suggests that candidates may not have been taught certain portions of the content Knowledge and understanding of the concepts in the subject Syllabus completion must be monitored closely Lack of knowledge of basic definitions. Lack of exposure to practical work was evident in the nature of responses provided by a number of candidates on questions based on practical work. Rate of reaction (P2), and diffraction and interference (2D and 3 D wave fronts ) in P1 need greater attention in 2013. Poor Mathematical skills relating to reading and interpretation of graphs, handling of calculators. The worst performance in P1 was in Q7 based on 2D and 3D wave fronts (40.1% average score) and in Q6 in paper 2 on rates of reactions (33.2%)

48 Life Sciences

49 Life Sc registered a drop in the pass rate
Life Sc registered a drop in the pass rate. There was an increase in the percentage of candidates who performed at % in 2012, compared to 2011, a drop in the number of candidates between 30% to 59% level.

50 Average performance per question in Life Sciences Paper 1
Content assessed Q1 Multiple choice, matching, terminology and short questions Q2 Meiosis, protein synthesis and monohybrid cross Q3 Pedigree diagram, DNA and genetic modification Q4 Human evolution, phylogenetic tree, natural and artificial selection

51 Average marks achieved per question as expressed as a percentage: P2
Content Assessed Q1 Multiple choice, matching, terminology and short questions Q2 Brain, Eye, Reproduction, Temperature regulation Q3 Population growth form, human population growth and age-gender pyramids Q4 Culling, competition, adrenalin and reflex action

52 Limited knowledge of basic terminology and concepts.
Key areas of Concern Proposed Interventions Limited knowledge of basic terminology and concepts. Emphasis on learning of terminology. Glossary of biological terminology can be provided Teachers need to pay attention to skills relating to drawing graphs, interpreting graphs, making conclusions from data (both P1 and P2) Syllabus completion needs to be ensured. No aspect of the syllabus should be omitted since all aspects are assessed. Lack of associated Mathematics skills required to draw graphs e.g. pie charts. Inappropriate interpretation of questions

53 Interventions

54 Generic Interventions
Districts and schools will continue to guide learners in making the right subject choices and combinations Subject advisors will convene workshops with teachers, where these reports could be thoroughly discussed and mediated, and problem areas addressed with teachers. Monitoring of the utilisation of the Diagnostic Reports. Monitoring of syllabus completion Focused interventions targeting areas of weaknesses highlighted in the report combined with general systemic interventions

55 Assessment Interventions
Improving the Quality of School Based Assessment Development of quality assessment items (bank of items for SBA) Publication of exemplars of learner responses to questions in selected subjects (Geography, History, Eng. FAL P3, Economics) Preparation for NSC 2014 based on assessment as outlined in CAPs Advocacy Development of exemplar question papers Development of examination syllabi/guidelines in all subjects (Gd. 12)

56 Teacher development Teacher support will be provided in the following ways: Develop study guides to assist teachers /learners in areas needed Develop sample lessons on sections where teacher content knowledge has been found to be deficient Focused training of teachers on specific content Monitor and support training and implementation of difficult content Learner support material Development and distribution of Mind the gap series in certain key subjects on specific content areas with examination practice questions

57 Learner support Development and distribution of Mind the gap series in certain key subjects on specific content areas with examination practice questions Provision of self study guides and past question papers for revision

58 Curriculum Coverage Monitoring tool to track curriculum coverage at school level has been developed. Monitoring tool will be administered by managers at the various levels in the system. Reporting on a quarterly basis to the PED and DBE. DBE to conduct sample verification visits to authenticate the reports

59 Qualification Challenges

60 Pass Requirement – 30% Public perception that the pass requirements for the NSC are pegged at a low level This is based on mis-information on the full package relating to pass requirements. NSC serves as a school leaving certificate, as well as a certificate for admission to higher education – hence the different categories of NSC passes

61 Mathematics/ Maths Literacy
Increasing percentage of learners are migrating to Mathematics Literacy. Maths Literacy is selected as a soft option but not recognised for admission to University studies in certain faculties. Issues: - is the Maths/Maths Literacy divide useful in promoting Mathematics in the country. - what is the purpose of Maths Lit and is this being achieved. - what control measures need to be instituted to curb gate-keeping by school principals.

62 Trends in Matric Mathematics since 2008
Numbers wrote maths Number passed maths Maths pass rate Proportion taking maths Proportion passing maths 2008 298821 136503 45.70% 56.10% 25.60% 2009 290407 133505 46.00% 52.60% 24.20% 2010 263034 124749 47.40% 48.80% 23.20% 2011 224635 104033 46.30% 45.30% 21.00% 2012 225874 121970 54.00% 44.19% 23.86%

63 Life Orientation Life Orientation focuses on the development of moral, civic, social and physical skills. Assessment is school based (100%) Given the inflated performance of learners, LO is not recognised for University admission. DBE piloted a Common Assessment Task (CAT) developed nationally, in 2012. Issues: - Should the assessment of LO be changed to incorporate an external examination? - Does LO lend itself to external examinations?

64 Life Orientation Issues: - Should LO be retained as a NSC subject?
- What should be done to improve the status of LO.

65 School Based Assessment
SBA still forms 25 % of final mark Quality of SBA tasks remains an area of concern How do we improve capacity of teachers to set good quality SBA tasks? Utilisation of SBA as a means of driving performance

66 Ministerial Committee
Ministerial Committee will be constituted and will commence with their research by April 2013. Committee will comprise of a Technical Research Team and a broader Reference Group. Preliminary report will presented to the Minister by July 2013.

67 Umalusi Concerns

68 Question Papers (a) Non adherence to time frames and the 18 month cycle Eighteen (18) month cycle to be progressively implemented (2013 – 2014). In 2013, Umalusi prescribed timeline of first moderation April 2013 and final moderation by July 2013, will be adhered. The panel for 2014 has been appointed and will commence with the setting process in April 2013 (well ahead of schedule) Separate panel has been appointed for each paper, per subject to reduce time required for setting and to improve quality

69 Competency of examiners/capacity of panels
Rigorous recruitment process has been concluded. Panels have been reviewed for 2013 / 2014 Examiners subjected to a competency test based on subject knowledge and assessment skills. Performance of examiners is evaluated on an annual basis. Appointment extended based on performance status. Intensive training session scheduled for March 2013 – focus on question taxonomies.

70 SBA and Life Orientation:
(a) Poor quality and standard of school based assessment tasks Exemplar assessment tasks will be developed and distributed to schools (for both SBA and LO). Common Assessment Task (CAT) for Life Orientation to be administered in September 2013. DBE will conduct a national moderation of the June and Preparatory examinations in seven (7) key subjects. Moderation systems at school, district and provincial levels will be rigorously monitored by the DBE.

71 SBA and Life Orientation
The national panel of moderators will be deployed to selected districts to conduct moderation of SBA and LO Exemplars of learner evidence (responses) from the 2012 NSC examination will be published with the marking comments and awarded scores.

72 Marking (a) Marker competency:
Policy and Regulations on the implementation of competency tests for markers will be approved by the Minister and published by March 2013. Will be implemented in seven (7) key subjects and will form part of the criteria utilized for the appointment of markers. Early administration will allow for a training programme to be implemented prior to the marking process.

73 Marking Report on the outcome of the re-mark results to be shared with each of the PEDs. Assist in identifying subjects with significant variations. Markers will be brought to account where there are major changes. DBE to conduct random audit of markers appointed by PEDs. More intensive moderation of marking by PEDs and DBE.

74 Administration of Examinations
Examination processes across all PEDs will be standardised through the use of standard operating procedures, outlined in Examination Process Manuals . Security across the whole exam system will be enhanced through the declaration of examinations as a national priority by NATJOC. Printing quality and accuracy will be given attention through intensive monitoring and ensuring compliance to control processes.

75 Conclusion The data emanating from NSC 2012 and prior, has been analysed closely to ensure that important trends are identified and acted upon. The Ministerial Committee which is in the process of being constituted by the Minister will address the curriculum challenges that are emanating from the five year review. The Diagnostic Report which focuses on the key subjects must be discussed with all subject advisors and teachers so that these shortcomings are decisively addressed in 2013.


Download ppt "National Senior Certificate Examinations - 2012 Presentation to Portfolio Committee 12 February 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google