Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Interpreting the Bill of Rights.  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Interpreting the Bill of Rights.  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the."— Presentation transcript:

1 Interpreting the Bill of Rights

2  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the ‘Court’ are presented as case studies- descriptions of situations or conflicts, the issues involved, and the decisions made.

3  Des, Moines Iowa (1965) - Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt - protesting the Vietnam War - wore black arm- bands to school

4  The Case *Once school officials learned about the protest... - school officials forbade the armbands - students wore the armbands anyway and were suspended

5  Argument - parents: - students were being denied their rights - did not disrupt classes - did not interfere with other students’ rights - school: - ‘armband rule’ preserved discipline - schools not places for political demonstrations

6  Court’s Decision -What was the court’s decision on the case?

7  Court’s Decision - local and state court - armband rule was necessary - avoided disruption of classes - Supreme Court - form of ‘speech’- symbols representing ideas - did not interfere with students’ right to education

8  Background (1938- 1945) - 1930’s Adolf Hitler Nazi Party - attacked Jews throughout Germany

9  Skokie, Illinois (1977) - town included 40,000 Jews - many survived Nazi camps (and many relatives did not) -American Nazi Party wanted to march through Skokie with large black swastika (symbol of Nazi Party)  To prevent march… - group would have to obtain $350,000 of insurance

10  Argument: - people against ‘march’: - “freedom of expression has no meaning when it defends those who would end this right for others” - American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): - “the First Amendment has to be for everyone- or it will be for no one”

11  Appealing the Case - What was the court’s decision on the case?

12  June 14, 1977- Supreme Court - Protecting 1 st Amendment Rights - Skokie law requiring insurance violated First Amendment (limited freedoms of speech/assembly) - right to distribute materials expressing hatred (First Amendment protects expression of all ideas)

13 - Symbols as Speech - swastika was not banned - Market of Ideas - amendment protects popular and unpopular ideas

14  Judge Learned Hand - defender of free speech - “by respecting one another’s rights, we help guarantee that the Bill of Rights survives”


Download ppt "Interpreting the Bill of Rights.  Judges - interpret meaning of citizens’ rights 1. local judges 2. states judges 3. Supreme Court *Decisions of the."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google