Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Growth in Vietnam, 2004-2012: Who Has Benefitted Most? Reena Badiani-Magnusson World Bank and Loren Brandt University of Toronto.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Growth in Vietnam, 2004-2012: Who Has Benefitted Most? Reena Badiani-Magnusson World Bank and Loren Brandt University of Toronto."— Presentation transcript:

1 Growth in Vietnam, 2004-2012: Who Has Benefitted Most? Reena Badiani-Magnusson World Bank and Loren Brandt University of Toronto

2 Objectives Look at growth in incomes and distributive outcomes between 2004-2012 using the VHLSS Several key questions: – Where is the growth in incomes coming from? – What is the link between this growth and distributive outcomes? – What role are age, educational background and location playing in sorting households into the most rapidly growing activities? – Who has been hurt by the post-IFC slowdown?

3 Preliminary Findings (focus on rural here) Ongoing structural change in the economy – Shift from agricultural to non-agricultural – Declining role of family-run businesses, especially participation – Movement into the labor market Important role of growth in wage earnings, but segmented Urban: more highly skilled service sector jobs Rural: less skilled jobs in manufacturing Critical role of labor markets in intermediating flows between agricultural and non- agriculture, and the countryside and the cities Rapid manufacturing sector wage growth playing equalizing role in countryside and helping to offset declining role of agriculture; agriculture should not be ignored however Geography matters: – Sub-regional differences in rise of manufacturing; – Critical differences between North and South in growth in agriculture Education increasingly important, especially at the bottom Overall, modest rise in inequality: decline in fortunes at the bottom offset by rising middle

4 Distribution of Income, Vietnam

5

6 Measures of Incomes and Distribution

7

8 Average Income and Growth Rates by Activity, All Households

9 Average Income and Growth Rates by Activity Rural Households Only

10 Shorrocks Decomposition, Rural

11

12 Linear Probability Model for Participation

13 Summary: Participation Regressions Lower secondary education increases likelihood of working in manufacturing relative to primary or below Males/females 15-29 much more likely in mfg Market access matters for mfg – Paved road in commune – Distance to towns and cities

14 Unconditional Quintiles: Education

15 Unconditional Quintile: Land

16 Final Thoughts Need to sort through transitory versus permanent changes in distribution Functioning of labor markets increasingly important; same is true for land Can’t ignore agriculture and its role in the process of structural transformation Lot more to do!


Download ppt "Growth in Vietnam, 2004-2012: Who Has Benefitted Most? Reena Badiani-Magnusson World Bank and Loren Brandt University of Toronto."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google