1. No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional Specialist 561-434-8850, PX48850

2. Purpose Overview of current AYP Rules Introduce new additional rule  Florida’s Growth Model for AYP

3. Pre-test Schools What are the AYP groups? What is the participation rate target? What is the proficiency target for reading? For mathematics? Students What is considered proficient in reading and in mathematics? What is considered proficient in writing?

4.  All public schools, including Charter Schools Alternative Schools  All students Who are included in AYP?

5.  Students with FCAT scores or Alternate Assessments (SWD only) Who are included in AYP?

6. Total Race/Ethnic Groups  White (W)  Black (B)  Hispanic (H)  Asian (A)  American Indian (I) What are the groups?

7. Economically Disadvantaged Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students with Disabilities (SWD) What are the groups?

8. Economically Disadvantaged  Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch What are the groups?

9. Limited English Proficient (LEP)  LY (currently active in program) and  LF (up to 2 years monitoring after exit from program) What are the groups?

10. Students With Disabilities  Students with exceptionality other than gifted What are the groups?

11.  Participation rate  Student academic proficiency What are the AYP measures?

12.  Participation rate: students in Survey 3 (February)  Student academic proficiency students in Survey 2 (October) and Survey 3 (February) Who are included in the AYP measures ?

13. 95% What is the Participation Rate Target? School

14. What is the proficiency rate target? Year Reading % Proficient Mathematics % Proficient 2001-023138 2002-033138 2003-043138 2004-053744 2005-064450 2006-075156 2007-085862 2008-096568 2009-107274 2010-117980 2011-1286 2012-1393 2013-14100 51 56 School

15. What is considered proficient? FCAT & FAAR FCAT Reading and Math FCAT Writing FAAR Achievement Levels Level 3 and aboveScore 3 and aboveLevel 3 and above Student

16. What is the writing proficiency rate target? All groups  At least 90% of students earn a score of 3.0 points or greater or 1% improvement from previous year School

17. What is the graduation rate target? High Schools only  85% or greater or 1% improvement from previous year School

18.  School Grade  Participation Rate  Graduation Rate  Proficiency in  Writing  Reading  Mathematics  Safe Harbor  Growth Model What are the components of the AYP Calculation?

19. School Grade Proficiency Target in both Reading and Math Participation Rate What are the components of the AYP Calculation? Writing & Graduation (HS) Criteria

20. Did each group not proficient meet Safe Harbor? Safe Harbor Did each group not meeting Safe Harbor meet the Growth Model? Growth Model Did the school meet the Writing & Graduation Criteria? Writing & Graduation (HS) Criteria Did each group meet Proficiency Target in both Reading and Math? Proficiency Target in both Reading and Math Did the school test 95% of every group? Participation Rate Did the school receive a D or F? School Grade AYP NOT MADE! MADE AYP! AYP NOT MADE! NO YES W&GW&G Did each group meet the Writing & Graduation Criteria? What are the components of the AYP Calculation? AYP NOT MADE! NO

21. GROWTH MODEL How does it work?

22. Grades 4-10  Students in Survey 2 (October) and Survey 3 (February)  Students with prior year FCAT DSS Grade 3  Students in Survey 2 (October) and Survey 3 (February)  First Time (no DSS available)  Retained GROWTH MODEL Who is included in the GROWTH MODEL ?

23. Proficiency within 3 years GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

24. FY 2007 Current Grade

25. DSS from FY 2006 (previous year) Base score for trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

26. Count three years from FY2006 (Base Score) 1 2 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

27. Determine the Proficiency Target GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

28. 1715 -1430 285 Subtract Proficiency Target from Base Score GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

29. 1715 -1430 285 Divide difference By 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

30. 285/3 = 95 Divide difference by 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

31. + 95 = 1525 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Determine Trajectory

32. + 95 = 1620 Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1525 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

33. Determine Trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1620

34. Determine Trajectory Year 2 DSS GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1620

35. Determine Trajectory + 95 =1715 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Year 2 DSS Year 1 DSS

36. Determine Trajectory Year 3 DSS GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 =1715 Year 2 DSS Year 1 DSS

37. Trajectory Set GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

38. FY07 Year 1 – Student 1 On track: YES

39. Current Grade 5 Student 2

40. FY07 Year 1 – Student 2 On track: NO

41. FY08 Year 2 – Student 2 On track: NO

42. FY08 Year 3 – Student 2 On track: YES

43. Current Grade 6 Level 3 Student

44. GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? FY 2007 Current Grade

45. DSS from FY 2006 (previous year) Base score for trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

46. Count three years from FY2006 (Base Score) 1 2 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

47. Determine the Proficiency Target GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

48. 1882 -1597 285 Subtract Proficiency Target from Base Score GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

49. Divide difference By 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? 1882 -1597 285

50. 285/3 = 95 Divide difference by 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

51. + 95 = 1682 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Determine Trajectory

52. + 95 = 1777 Year 1 DSS GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 = 1682

53. Determine Trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 = 1777 Year 1 DSS

54. Determine Trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 = 1777 Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1882 Year 2 DSS

55. Determine Trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 = 1882 Year 1 DSS Year 2 DSS

56. Determine Trajectory Year 3 DSS GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 = 1882 Year 1 DSS Year 2 DSS

57. Trajectory Set GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

58. Current Grade 3 First Time Proficient: YES Non-proficient: NO

59. Current Grade 3 Retained

60. Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd 2006 3rd 2007 4th 2008 5th 2009 Current Grade

61. Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd 2006 3rd 2007 4th 2008 5th 2009 Current Grade DSS from FY 2006 (previous year) Base score for trajectory

62. Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd 2006 3rd 2007 4th 2008 5th 2009 Current Grade Proficiency Target Based on Grade 6 Level 3 DSS

63. Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd 2006 3rd 2007 4th 2008 5th 2009 Current Grade Trajectory Set

64. Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student

65. DSS from FY 2006 (previous year) Base score for trajectory Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student

66. Determine the Proficiency Target Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student

67. Trajectory Set Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student

68. Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student - Year 1 Proficient: YES On track: NO

69. Proficient: YES On track: YES Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student - Year 2

70. Proficient: YES On track: YES Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student - Year 3

71. Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year 336333% 4363 5473 6583 7693 8710333% 9810333% 109 250% GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

72. Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year 336333% 4363 5473 6583 7693 8710333% 9810333% 109 250% GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

73. Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year 336333% 4363 5473 6583 7693 8710333% 9810333% 109 250% GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

74. Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year 336333% 4363 5473 6583 7693 8710333% 9810333% 109 250% GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

75. Improving an achievement level maintaining a proficient level from the prior year: i.e.,  3 to 3  4 to 4  5 to 5 How is the growth of SWD students with FAAR scores determined? ?

76. GROWTH How is a School’s GROWTH percent calculated? 100Students are in survey 2 and 3 and have prior DSS scores 50Students met growth criteria 50%School’s Growth Percent

77. What is the growth target? Year Reading % Proficient Mathematics % Proficient 2001-023138 2002-033138 2003-043138 2004-053744 2005-064450 2006-075156 2007-085862 2008-096568 2009-107274 2010-117980 2011-1286 2012-1393 2013-14100 51 56 School

78.  Greater than or equal to 30 and at least 15% of total school population or  At least 100 students in the subgroup count GROWTH How many students are needed to calculate a School’s GROWTH percent?

79. Example of AYP Report

80. Groups ParticipationAnnual ObjectivesWriting Reading % Tested (> 95%) Math % Tested (> 95%) Reading % Proficient (> 51%) Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Proficient 2007 % Proficient (> 90%) or 1% Improvement Total100 66709394 White100 7382 Black100995255 Hispanic100 6260 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 100 6145 LEP100 4757 SWD100 6065 R M Participation Annual Obj. Writing

81. Groups ParticipationAnnual ObjectivesWriting Reading % Tested (> 95%) Math % Tested (> 95%) Reading % Proficient (> 51%) Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Proficient 2007 % Proficient (> 90%) or 1% Improvement Total100 66709394 White100 7382 Black100995255 Hispanic100 6260 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 100 6145 LEP100 4757 SWD100 6065 R M Participation Annual Obj. Writing

82. Groups ParticipationAnnual ObjectivesWriting and/or Graduation Reading % Tested (> 95%) Math % Tested (> 95%) Reading % Proficient (> 51%) Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Proficient 2007 % Proficient (> 90%) or 1% Improvement Total100 66709394 White100 7382 Black100995255 Hispanic100 6260 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 100 6145 LEP100 4757 SWD100 6065 R M Participation Annual Obj. Writing

83. Groups ParticipationAnnual ObjectivesWriting and/or Graduation Reading % Tested (> 95%) Math % Tested (> 95%) Reading % Proficient (> 51%) Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Proficient 2007 % Proficient (> 90%) or 1% Improvement Total100 66709394 White100 7382 Black100995255 Hispanic100 6260 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 100 6145 LEP100 4757 SWD100 6065 R M Participation Annual Obj. Writing

84. Groups ParticipationAnnual ObjectivesWriting and/or Graduation Reading % Tested (> 95%) Math % Tested (> 95%) Reading % Proficient (> 51%) Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Proficient 2007 % Proficient (> 90%) or 1% Improvement Total100 66709394 White100 7382 Black100995255 Hispanic100 6260 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 100 6145 LEP100 4757 SWD100 6065 R M Participation Annual Obj. Writing/Graduation

85. Groups ParticipationAnnual ObjectivesWriting and/or Graduation Reading % Tested (> 95%) Math % Tested (> 95%) Reading % Proficient (> 51%) Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Proficient 2007 % Proficient (> 90%) or 1% Improvement Total100 66709394 White100 7382 Black100995255 Hispanic100 6260 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 100 6145 LEP100 4757 SWD100 6065 R M Participation Annual Obj. Writing/Graduation

86. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556550 LEP4757605354455058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

87. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556550 LEP4757695354455058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

88. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556550 LEP4755695354455058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

89. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556550 LEP4757695354435058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

90. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556550 LEP4757695354435058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

91. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556550 LEP4757695354435058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

92. Groups Annual ObjectivesSafe HarborGrowth Model 2007 Reading % Proficient (> 51%) 2007 Math % Proficient (> 56%) 2006 % Not Proficient Reading 2007 % Not Proficient Reading (> 10% less) 2006 % Not Proficient Math 2007 % Not Proficient Math (> 10% less) 2007 Reading % On Track (> 51%) 2007 Math % On Track (> 56%) Total6670363435306874 White7382242721187383 Black5255524845 6061 Hispanic6260483847406461 Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged 6145403940556569 LEP4757695354435058 SWD6065614061355457 R RR M M M M R Annual Obj.Safe HarborGrowth

93. Impact 211 more schools would have made AYP in 2005-06 than in 2005, approximately 7 percent of all schools.

94. Summary Reviewed AYP rules Introduced Growth Model  Student Growth  School Growth Percent Review Sample AYP Report

95. Post-test 1. What are the AYP groups? 1. Total 2. White 3. Black 4. Hispanic 5. Asian 6. American Indian 7. Economically Disadvantaged 8. Limited English Proficient Students With Disabilities Schools

96. Post-test 2. What is the participation rate target? 95% Schools

97. Post-test 3. What is the proficiency target for reading? For mathematics? Reading 51%Mathematics 56% Schools

98. Post-test 4. What is considered proficient in reading and mathematics? Level 3 and above Students

99. Post-test 5. What is considered proficient in writing? 3.0 points and above Students