1. ASEAN WORKING GROUP ON WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (AWGWRM) Presentation On “Action Plans And Strategies Related to IWRM in ASEAN Countries” - MONITORING INDICATORS Updated July 2012

2. 6 Major Water Management Issues  Water Supply  Irrigation  Stormwater Management  Floods Management  Water Pollution  Sanitation Management

3. Feed Back From ASEAN Countries Country Key Issues Malaysia Myanmar Singapore Indonesia Vietnam Lao PDR Cambodia Brunei Thailand Philippine Water Supply /N/A// ///// Irrigation/N/A / // Storm Water Management /N/A/ // Flood Management /N/A///// // Water Pollution Management /N/A/ // Sanitation Management /N/A/// // /

4. Goal for Water Supply Management Goal 1: ◦ To reduce the inaccessibility to piped drinking water supply by half by the year 2010, (2015) Goal 2: ◦ To have safe, reliable, efficient and affordable water supply Goal 3: ◦ To promote water conservation

5. Indicator Percentage of population having access to piped drinking water Percentage of water deliver to customer in meeting WHO guidelines for drinking water quality Average hour of water supplied per day Per capita domestic water consumption Percentage of water supply metered Percentage of UFW/NRW

6. 1.Water Supply Monitoring IndicatorsPhilippines Malaysia Singapore 1.Percentage of population having access to piped drinking water Out of the 80% water supply coverage only 70% are having piped connections 91.6 %100% 2.Percentage of water deliver (cu.m) to customer meeting WHO guidelines for drinking water quality N/A100% 3.Average hour of water supplied per day 18 – 24 hours24 hrs 4.Per capita domestic water consumption 118 l/d/c202 l/c/d154 lpc 5.Percentage of water supply metered Piped connections is metered 100% 6.Percentage of UFW/NRW > 20 %40%5%

7. 1.Water Supply Monitoring IndicatorsThailandBrunei 1.Percentage of population having access to piped drinking water 99.45% (80,000 villages, and 4,000 of which do not have official water supply system) 100% 2.Percentage of water deliver (cu.m) to customer meeting WHO guidelines for drinking water quality 88.5%100% 3.Average hour of water supplied per day 24 hrs 4.Per capita domestic water consumption About 200 lpcd in urban areas and 100 lpcd in rural areas. 410 l/d 5.Percentage of water supply metered N/A100% 6.Percentage of UFW/NRW 45 – 50%40%

8. Goal for Irrigation Management Goal 1: ◦ To improve irrigation water accessibility Goal 2: ◦ To ensure that irrigation systems are resilient to the impact of climate change Goal 3: ◦ To improve efficiency and reliability of use of the irrigation water

9. Indicator Percentage of irrigated area versus the total potential irrigable area Percentage of irrigated area damaged by flood and drought Percentage of irrigated area with water quantity measuring devices

10. 2. Irrigation Management Monitoring Indicators Philippines Malaysia Thailand 1.Percentage of irrigated area versus the total potential irrigable area 49%55%47% 2.Percentage of irrigated area damaged by flood and drought n/a9% Wet season area 0.18% Dry season area 0.38% 3.Percentage of irrigated area with water quantity measuring devices n/a86%>95%

11. Objectives of Stormwater Management Enabling Environment-  To establish a national policy for managing stormwater  To introduce Stormwater Quality Legislation Institutional Environment  Regulatory agencies to control stormwater quality  Formal arrangement for multi agencies participation Management Tools  To use modelling tools to model water quality and water quantity  To develop design manual/code of practices

12. Goal for Stormwater Management Goal 1: ◦ To ensure surface runoff is of good quality Goal 2: ◦ To maintain hydrological water balance

13. Indicator  To establish a national policy for managing stormwater  To introduce Stormwater Quality Legislation  Regulatory agencies to control stormwater quality  Formal arrangement for multi agencies participation  To use modelling tools to model water quality and water quantity  To develop design manual/code of practices

14. 3.Stormwater Management Monitoring Indicators Malaysia Philipine Singapore Vietnam 1.Any policy on managing stormwater YESNOYES 2.Any legislation on managing stormwater YESNOYES 3.Any regulatory agencies to control stormwater YES 4.Any formal institutional arrangements among related agencies to manage stormwater YES 5.Use of computer modelling tools to model stormwater quality and quantity YESNOYESN/A 6.Availability of design manual/code of practices for stormwater management YES N/A

15. 3.Stormwater Management Monitoring Indicators Myanmar Thailand Lao PDR Cambodia Indonesia Brunei 1.Any policy on managing stormwater YES 2.Any legislation on managing stormwater YES NO 3.Any regulatory agencies to control stormwater YES 4.Any formal institutional arrangements among related agencies to manage stormwater YES NO 5.Use of computer modelling tools to model stormwater quality and quantity N/A NO 6.Availability of design manual/code of practices for stormwater management N/A YES

16. Objectives of Floods Management Enabling Environment- ◦ Project financing ◦ Legislation for river conservation Institutional Environment ◦ Government agencies to regulate stormwater quantity ◦ To establish inter sector partnership i.e. government and private ◦ To build competency for all parties Management Tools ◦ To use modelling tools to assess flood mitigation projects ◦ To develop flood early warning system ◦ To establish Integrated Flood Management (IFM) ◦ To develop flood data information system

17. Goal for Flood Management Goal 1: ◦ To consider integrated solution i.e. structural and non-structural mitigation measures Goal 2: ◦ To reduce flooding to an acceptable level by the public

18. Indicator  Project financing  Legislation for river conservation  Government agencies to regulate stormwater quantity  To establish inter sector partnership i.e. government and private  To build competency for all parties  To use modelling tool to assess flood mitigation projects  To develop flood early warning system  To establish Integrated Flood Management (IFM)  To develop flood data information system

19. 4.Flood Management Monitoring Indicators Philippines Malaysia Thailand Singapore Vietnam 1.Any steps taken to implement Integrated Flood Management (IFM) approaches in the country YES 2.Percentage of high risk flood-prone areas in the country covered by early flood warning and response systems N/A70 %66% N/A 3.Percentage of high risk flood-prone areas in the country covered by a real time flood monitoring information system N/A90 %28%N/A 4.Percentage of annual national budget allocated to flood management N/A2%Almost 1%N/A 5.Any legislation on river conservation N/AYES N/AYES 6.Any formal institutional arrangements among related agencies to manage floods N/AYES N/AYES

20. 4.Flood Management Monitoring Indicators Indonesia Myanmar Lao PDR Cambodia Brunei 1.Any steps taken to implement Integrated Flood Management (IFM) approaches in the country YES 2.Percentage of high risk flood-prone areas in the country covered by early flood warning and response systems N/A 3.Percentage of high risk flood-prone areas in the country covered by a real time flood monitoring information system N/A 4.Percentage of annual national budget allocated to flood management N/A 5.Any legislation on river conservation YES 6.Any formal institutional arrangements among related agencies to manage floods YES

21. Objectives of Water Pollution Management Enabling Environment- ◦ Policy on water pollution control ◦ Legislation on water quality and waste water ◦ Financial support on controlling water pollutions programme Institutional Environment ◦ Organizational setup at national and provincial levels to implement water pollution policies ◦ Level of private sector/public participation in water pollution programme Management Tools ◦ Information system/database for river water quality monitoring ◦ Integrated river water quality master plan at national and local levels ◦ Monitoring mechanism (quality & quantity) for river water pollution ◦ Awareness/advocacy program for stakeholder on the importance of clean and healthy rivers ◦ Effective regulatory framework to control river water pollution ◦ River basin master plan for locating the highly polluting industries

22. Water Pollution Management Goal 1: ◦ Clean and vibrant rivers and streams (relative to current state) Indicator The Percentage of river that meets the water quality standard of the World Health Organisation (WHO) or equivalent for non-contact water activities”.

23. 5.Water Pollution Management Monitoring Indicators Philippines Malaysia Thailand Singapore Vietnam 1. Any policy on water pollution control YES 2. Any specific legislation for the management of water quality and wastewater YES 3. Any specific financial support programme for controlling water pollutions YES NO 4. Any formal institutional arrangements among related agencies to manage water pollution YES NO 5. Any public/private sector partnership and participation in managing water pollution YES 6. Any river water quality monitoring information system/database YES NOYES 7. Any river water quality master plan at national and local levels NOYES N/A 8. Any river basin master plan for relocating the highly polluting industries in a river basin NOYES N/A

24. Objectives of Sanitation Management Enabling Environment- ◦ Policy on urban/rural sanitation and sewerage system ◦ Legislation on water quality and waste water ◦ Enough financial support on sanitation and sewerage programme/projects Institutional Environment ◦ Organizational setup at national and provincial levels to implement sanitation policies ◦ Level of private sector participation in providing sanitation services for the people Management Tools ◦ Information system/database for sanitation/sewerage system ◦ Comprehensive sewerage/sanitation master plan at national and local level ◦ Monitoring mechanism (quality & quantity) for sanitation system ◦ Awareness/advocacy programme for stakeholder on the importance of proper sanitation and sewerage system ◦ Effective regulatory framework to control quality of wastewater discharges ◦ Landuse masterplan for locating the locations of highly polluting industries

25. Goal 1: ◦ Increase urban sewerage coverage & improve performance Goal 2: ◦ Increase rural sanitation systems 6. Sanitation Management

26. Monitoring IndicatorsPhilippinesMalaysia SingaporeBrunei 1.Any policy on urban/rural sanitation and sewerage systemsYES 2.Any specific legislation on urban/rural sanitation and sewerage systems YES NO 2.Percentage of annual budget for sanitation and sewerage programme/projects 3 %<1% 1.2% 4.Any integrated national and provincial institutions to implement sanitation policies YES 5.Any private sector participation in providing sanitation services for the people YES NOYES 6. Any national sanitation/sewerage information system/databaseYES 7.Any comprehensive sewerage/sanitation master plan at national, regional and local levels NOYES 8.Any effective regulatory framework to control the quality of wastewater discharges to water courses YESYes YES 9.Any landuse masterplan for relocating the highly polluting industries in a river basin N/ANO YESNO 10.Any awareness/advocacy programme for stakeholders on the importance of proper sanitation and sewerage systems YES 6. SANITATION MANAGEMENT

27. 1. The monitoring indicators for all the major issues could not be completed due to lack of information from member countries. 2. Malaysia is having difficulty in getting feedbacks on the monitoring indicators from member countries through e-mail correspondence. 3. Malaysia propose to have a workshop to discuss the action plans and stategies related to IWRM in the ASEAN Countries before the next 13 th AWGWRM. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

28. THANK YOU