1. Graduate Centre of Business, Lecture Series in Research Methodology - Spring 2009: Great Beginnings and Endings in Academic Writing Lawrence Cleary, Dr. íde O’Sullivan, Patricia Herron Research Officers, Regional Writing Centre, UL, C1065/66, Main Building Lawrence Cleary, Dr. íde O’Sullivan, Patricia Herron Research Officers, Regional Writing Centre, UL, C1065/66, Main Building

2. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 2 Consilium Put on your red shoes and dance the blues Dance to the song they’re playin’ on the radio Let’s sway through the crowd to an empty space Pints of porter Sway to the moonlight, the serious moonlight

3. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 3 Put on your red shoes There is all kinds of things that you have to do before you start writing. The most difficult part is getting started. The most important thing is to start dancing now. There is all kinds of things that you have to do before you start writing. The most difficult part is getting started. The most important thing is to start dancing now.

4. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 4 01/11/2015 4 Prewriting Planning –Evaluating the rhetorical situation, or context, into which you write –Choosing and focusing your topic –Establishing an organizing principle Gathering information –Entering the Discourse on your Topic –Taking notes as a Strategy to Avoid Charges of Plagiarism –Evaluating sources

5. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 5 Assessing your writing situation Your writing process The rhetorical situation or context Your own writing strategies

6. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 6 Let’s Dance: Freewrite Prompt: A topic in business that I would like to research is… Keep writing non-stop for 5 minutes. Write in sentences. Do not edit or censor your writing. Discuss what you have written in pairs. Prompt: A topic in business that I would like to research is… Keep writing non-stop for 5 minutes. Write in sentences. Do not edit or censor your writing. Discuss what you have written in pairs.

7. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 7 The music they’re playing on the radio Entering the discourse communities Reporting on what they are saying, on where they agree and where they disagree, and on how this pertains to you and your topic. Entering the discourse communities Reporting on what they are saying, on where they agree and where they disagree, and on how this pertains to you and your topic.

8. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 8 Drafting Get your thoughts down on paper –Don’t worry about order or grammar –At some point, stop to assess what was written –Look for patterns or indications of direction, a path into a discourse Get your thoughts down on paper –Don’t worry about order or grammar –At some point, stop to assess what was written –Look for patterns or indications of direction, a path into a discourse

9. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 9 Sway through the crowd to an empty space Identifying poorly supported conclusions Contested conclusions Gaps in the research Identifying poorly supported conclusions Contested conclusions Gaps in the research

10. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 10 Points of Order Research papers are organized around the problem, not the topic per se. The problem, in a sense, is the topic. Problems, however, exist in contexts, as do solutions.

11. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 11 Dissertation Structure Preliminaries Main Body –Introduction, Lit. Review, Methodology, Presentation of Data, Analysis of Data, Conclusions and Recommendations End Matter Preliminaries Main Body –Introduction, Lit. Review, Methodology, Presentation of Data, Analysis of Data, Conclusions and Recommendations End Matter

12. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 12 01/11/2015 12 Drafting your Dissertation or Thesis Try to visualize your dissertation or thesis. Work toward that vision. Begin to structure it—establish your section headings; give them titles. These do not have to be permanent. Examine the logical order of ideas reflected in those titles. Do not get hung up on details; elements of the draft are subject to change in the revision stage. Start to write the sections that you are ready to write. Don’t try to write the Introduction merely because it comes first.

13. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 13 Writing Prompt What question will I try to answer / problem will I try to solve / hypothesis will I try to affirm / claim will I try to defend? What do I need to know in order to answer that question? Defend the claim? Test the hypothesis? Layers: What other questions do I need to answer? Claims to defend? Hunches to test?

14. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 14 01/11/2015 14 Arguments & Logic A good argument will have, at the very least: –a thesis that declares the writer's position on the problem at hand; –an acknowledgment of the opposition that nods to, or quibbles with other points of view; –a set of clearly defined premises that illustrate the argument's line of reasoning; –evidence that validates the argument's premises; –a conclusion that convinces the reader that the argument has been soundly and persuasively made. (Dartmouth Writing Program 2005)

15. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 15 01/11/2015 15 Literature Review & Logic The Lit. Review that you wrote for your proposal will not necessarily be the same review that you submit as part of your dissertation. Think in terms of your argument and the support that you provided for claims: –Include a review of all the literature that you read to learn about your topic and the particular aspect of your topic that you focus on. –Include a review of the literature on the methodologies that you used.

16. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 16 Pints of Porter The literature that you read informs both the immediate context of the problem and the larger context of which it is a part. The methodology you choose determines the data you get, as does your analytical methodology determine what you get from that data.

17. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 17 Writing the Literature Review What is it? What is its purpose? –To guide and inform your process –To inform your audience about the credibility and value of your conclusions

18. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 18 Issues of Credibility Definition from Merriam-Webster: “an interpretation and synthesis of published research” (Merriam qtd in Murray 2006: 108). Choices speak to your understanding of the puddle.

19. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 19 Organization How will I organize my literature review? Can I classify or categorize the stuff I’ve read so far? Can I say how each piece of literature has helped to inform my over-riding questions and/or sub-questions?

20. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 20 Writing Prompt What do I know about my research topic? What I am looking for in the literature is... What are the schools of thought in the literature? The ‘great debates’ in my area are...

21. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 21 Questions Your Lit Review Should Answer (Murray 2006: 115) Why is this subject important? Who else thinks it’s important? Who has worked on this subject before? Who has done something similar to what I am doing? What can be adapted to my own study?

22. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 22 Questions Your Lit Review Should Answer (Murray 2006: 115) (Con’t) What are the gaps in the research? Who is going to use my material? What use will my project be? What will my contribution be? What specific question will I answer? [What specific questions will my research not be able to address?]

23. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 23 Writing Prompt If we can frame the main question in a hierarchy, below which are framed the sub-questions, and we can put these frames in a larger frame called the Literature Review, what frames are you ready to fill in? If you do not organize your literature around your question and sub-questions, how else will you categorize the literature in order to organize your discussion?

24. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 24 Organizing the Methodology Section(s) How will you organize your text in each section? How would you logically organize the information in this section? Will you organize the methods around the questions? Or around the methodological type?

25. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 25 Writing Prompt If you were to think about your main question and your sub-questions, what methods will you employ to answer each question? If you haven’t figured out what questions you are asking, do some backward engineering.

26. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 26 The Methodology Section “A thesis focuses on a central question and is unified by that focus” (Murray 2006: 123). In the methodology section, we have two kinds of data: –The methods used to gather data –The methods used to analyze the data

27. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 27 The Methodology Section Ultimately, your methodology section(s) should –Define and explain your method, your theoretical approach, naming your instrument (e.g. Case study, interview, etc.) –Show links between your method and others

28. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 28 The Methodology Section Ultimately, your methodology section(s) should –Justify your choice of methods –Report what you plan to do –Show how you will select and analyse the data and how you will document it –Say what you expect to find

29. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 29 Some Questions Your Methodolgy Section Should Answer Why will the data be admissible? Why is your choice of measuring instrument appropriate to your context / to the data you are aiming to retreive? By what criteria will you measure the validity of your measuring instruments? How do we know that your method will yield reliable data?

30. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 30 Valid, reliable information “ Sometimes there is universal agreement that a particular instrument provides a valid instrument for measuring a particular characteristic. We could all agree that a ruler measures length, a thermometer measures temperature, and a barometer measures air pressure. But whenever we do not have such universal agreement, we must provide evidence that an instrument we are using has validity for our purpose” (Leedy and Ormrod, 2005: 92).

31. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 31 Pints of Porter: Sometimes the Tail Wags the Dog Research methods affect: –data the researcher records about the phenomenon –the sorts of phenomena that can be studied –the sorts of understanding of the phenomenon that the researcher is likely to arrive at –the sorts of knowledge claims they will be able to sustain (Guba & Lincoln 1994 in Nandhakumar 2003) Sometimes form follows content: Sway to the moonlight

32. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 32 Content and Form ‘Understanding organisational behaviour has never been more important for managers’ (Robbins, 2003:14). Explain why this is the case, outlining in your answer the challenges and oppor- tunities faced by managers, and the value of understanding organisational behaviour to a practicing manager.

33. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 33 ‘Writing in Layers’ (Murray 2006: 125-27) Outline the structure: write your chapter or section headings. Write a sentence or two on the contents of each chapter/section. List out sub-headings for each section. Write an introductory paragraph for each section. At the top of each section, write the word count requirement, draft number and date.

34. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 34 Conclusion As you write, your organization may change. Many things determine order: –Arguments have a logical order, as do comparisons, cause/effect relationships, temporal or spatial descriptions, etc. –However, dissertations are thesis driven. Your question, and what you need to know, strongly influences the organization of your final product.

35. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 35 Don’t Forget Logical Choices and Unity of Purpose Methodologies & Logic Methodologies & Credibility Unity and Coherence Writing Strategies Logical Choices and Unity of Purpose Methodologies & Logic Methodologies & Credibility Unity and Coherence Writing Strategies

36. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 36 01/11/2015 36 Logical Choices and Unity of Purpose Every choice serves to defend a claim, answer a question, or confirm a hypothesis –Word, phrase, sentence-structure Does the choice satisfy audience expectations? Does it speak to your authorial credibility? Does it further your argument, analysis?

37. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 37 01/11/2015 37 Methodologies & Logic When you know what you need to know in order to answer a question, then it is logical to choose methods of inquiry that will supply the reliable verifiable data that you need in order to answer the question. Don’t forget to qualify your data—what does it tell you and what is it unable to tell you?

38. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 38 01/11/2015 38 Methodologies & Credibility All data has to be analyzed. You need a methodology for analyses as well. –Quantitative data: can it be generalized? –Qualitative data: what criteria will be used to establish its value? Do not overstate your results. An honest, quality analysis will speak volumes about your credibility, regardless of the quality of the data.

39. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 39 01/11/2015 39 Unity and Coherence If information included in your dissertation does not contribute to an understanding of the value of your conclusions and recommendations, then it only serves to befuddle the logic of your piece. A unified text is a more coherent text.

40. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 40 01/11/2015 40 Writing Strategies Map your paper –What sections or subsections are completed (keeping in mind you still have to revise), –Pick one or two of the holes in your paper that you would feel comfortable filling, –Assess the reasons for any anxiety you have over the unfinished parts that cause you anxiety Do you need to read more? Do you need to rethink your paper?

41. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 41 01/11/2015 41 Writing Strategies Outline your paper –Devise headings and subheadings for uncompleted sections This helps you see the logical progression (or lack of it) of your ideas It identifies the main ideas It helps detect omissions

42. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 42 01/11/2015 42 Writing Strategies Write about why you are having difficulty making advances in your paper –It gets the fingers tapping and the cerebral juices flowing –An awareness of fears and anxieties helps you to develop strategies to overcome those emotional roadblocks –You may discover that the reason that you are having difficulty is that there is some chink in the logic of your argument that you must either fill or that requires a major rethinking of the line of reasoning.

43. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 43 01/11/2015 43 Writing Strategies Don’t allow yourself to freeze up. When you are feeling overwhelmed… –Satisfy yourself with small advances until you feel more confident and unstuck –Seek help. Talk to friends. Talk about how you feel, but talk about your ideas as well. –Eat lots of ice cream and candy

44. 01/11/2015 Shannon Consortium Regional Writing Centre 44 Sources Bowie, D. 1983 “Let’s Dance” [online], available at: http://www.elyrics.net/read/d/david- bowie-lyrics/let_s-dance-lyrics.html [accessed 08 Feb. 2009].http://www.elyrics.net/read/d/david- bowie-lyrics/let_s-dance-lyrics.html Leedy, P.D. and Ormrod, J.E. 2005 Practical Research: Planning and Design, 8 th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Murray, R. 2006 How to Write a Thesis, 2 nd ed. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press. Nandhakumar, J. 2003 Interpreting Information Systems: A reflexive account of grounded theory analysis [ppt. online], available: http://project.hkkk.fi/gebsi/files/nav_activities/material/Nandhakumar_slides.pdf [accessed 15 Aug 2008]. http://project.hkkk.fi/gebsi/files/nav_activities/material/Nandhakumar_slides.pdf UEfAP.com 2008 Writing: Rhetorical Functions, Comparing and Contrasting Exercise 2 [online], available: http://www.uefap.com/writing/exercise/function/compcon2.htm [accessed Aug 16 2008].http://www.uefap.com/writing/exercise/function/compcon2.htm