1.  This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Recognition Process 2012-13 Materials available on www.pbisillinois.org

3. What is new in the Recognition Process for 2012-13?  For Start-up and Emerging levels of recognition, there were no changes.  Implementing level: the Tier 2/Tier 3 Tracking Tool needs to show documentation that it has been used to track students responding to one or more Tier 2 intervention (Check-in Check-out, Social/Academic Instructional Groups, Tier 2 with Individual Features).  A new level, Implementing Plus, has been added.  Fully Implementing level: the following PoI phases need to be in place:  Tier 1, Phases I, II, and III  Tier 2, Phases I, II, and III  Tier 3, Phases I and II  Exemplar level: the following PoI phases need to be in place:  Tier 1, Phases I, II, and III  Tier 2, Phases I, II, and III  Tier 3, Phases I, II, and III.

4. Levels of Recognition Start-Up Beginning the process of school-wide PBIS implementation. Emerging Building the foundation for school-wide PBIS implementation. Implementing Maintaining the school-wide PBIS foundation and building the foundation for Tier 2 Interventions Implementing Plus Sustaining school-wide PBIS implementation, maintaining Tier 2 Interventions, and building the foundation for Tier 3 Interventions Fully Implementing Sustaining school-wide PBIS implementation, maintaining Tier 2 Interventions, and building the full continuum of supports for Tier 2/Tier 3 Exemplar Demonstrating the “ideal model” of building, maintaining, and sustaining Tier 1, 2, and 3 school-wide PBIS, while maintaining academic integrity

5. Start-up  Use and submit the PoI at least once yearly  Demonstrate PBIS implementation by fulfilling one or more criterion on the most recent PoI at the following phase: Tier 1, Phase I  Participate in Tier 1 Training.

6. Emerging  Use and submit the PoI at least once yearly  Demonstrate PBIS implementation by fulfilling all criteria on the most recent PoI at the following phase: Tier 1, Phase I  Provide the following PoI artifacts: Use and submit a Multi-Tiered Action Plan (MAP) Use and submit the Team Implementation Checklist (TIC), or score 70 or higher on the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ), or score 80/80 on the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Use and submit the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS).

7. Implementing  Use and submit the PoI at least once yearly  Demonstrate PBIS implementation by fulfilling all criteria on the most recent PoI at the following phases: Tier 1, Phase I and II, and Tier 2, Phase I  Provide the following PoI artifacts: Use and submit a Multi-Tiered Action Plan (MAP) Implement and submit a Daily Progress Report (DPR) for Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Use and submit a Tier 2/Tier 3 Interventions Tracking Tool which includes students with simple CICO or SAIG secondary interventions Score 70 or higher on the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ), or score 80/80 on the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Use and submit the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS)

8. Implementing Plus  Use and submit the PoI at least once yearly  Demonstrate PBIS implementation by fulfilling all criteria on the most recent PoI at the following phases: Tier 1, Phase I, II, and III, Tier 2, Phase I and II, and Tier 3, Phase I  Provide the following PoI Artifacts: Provide a description of parent or family involvement documenting that one or more family members are active members of school-based PBIS teams (target is participation in 50% of meetings) Use and submit a Multi-Tiered Action Plan (MAP) Implement and submit a Daily Progress Report (DPR) for Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Use and submit a Tier 2/Tier 3 Interventions Tracking Tool which includes students with: – Simple Tier 2 interventions (CICO or SAIG) – Tier 2 interventions with individualized features – Highly individualized Tier 3 interventions (Complex FBA/BIP OR wraparound/RENEW/Family Focus) Score 70 or higher on the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ), or score 80/80 on the School- wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Use and submit the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Use and submit the Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers (BAT)

9. Fully Implementing  Use and submit the PoI at least once yearly  Demonstrate PBIS implementation by fulfilling all criteria on the most recent PoI at the following phases: Tier 1, Phase I, II, and III, Tier 2, Phase I, II, and III, and Tier 3, Phase I and II  Provide the following PoI artifacts: Provide a description of parent or family involvement documenting that one or more family members are active members of school-based PBIS teams (target is participation in 50% of meetings.) Use and submit a Multi-Tiered Action Plan (MAP) Implement and submit Daily Progress Report (DPR) for Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Use and submit a Tier 2/Tier 3 Interventions Tracking Tool which includes students with: – Simple Tier 2 interventions (CICO or SAIG) – Tier 2 interventions with individualized features – Brief FBA/BIP – Complex FBA/BIP – Wraparound/RENEW/Family Focus Identify a LAN or Community Support contact Identify a Wraparound Facilitator trained in SIMEO Score 70 or higher on the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ), or score 80/80 on the School- wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Use and submit the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Use and submit the Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers (BAT)

10. Fully Implementing (con’t)  Provide Outcome Data:  Provide one-year of multi-tiered outcome data indicating that students have responded positively to PBIS implementation, demonstrate effectiveness of PBIS across all three tiers, and can be reported through the SWIS Triangle Data Report from the Year End Report or other comparable documentation:  Tier 1/Universal behavior supports - 85% or more of all students have 1 or fewer office discipline referrals/ODRs, Tier 2/Secondary behavior supports - 10% or less of all students have no more than 2-5 ODRs, Tier 3/Tertiary behavior supports - 4% or less of students have 6 or more ODRs, and 5% or less of students have received out-of-school suspensions, and a small number of students are placed out of their home school.  Note: Additional evidence and/or follow-up conversations may be necessary to fully evaluate discipline data.

11. Exemplar  Use and submit the Illinois Phases of Implementation Tool (PoI) at least once yearly  Demonstrate PBIS implementation by fulfilling all criteria on the most recent PoI at the following phases: Tier 1, Phase I, II, and III, Tier 2, Phase I, II, and III, and Tier 3, Phase I, II, and III  Provide the following PoI artifacts: Use and submit a Multi-Tiered Action Plan (MAP) Implement and submit a Daily Progress Report (DPR) for Tier 2/Secondary Interventions Use and submit a Tier 2/Tier 3 Interventions Tracking Tool which includes students with: – Simple Tier 2 interventions (CICO or SAIG) – Tier 2 interventions with individualized features – Brief FBA/BIP – Complex FBA/BIP – Wraparound/RENEW/Family Focus Identify a LAN or Community Support contact Identify a Wraparound Facilitator trained in SIMEO Provide a description of parent or family involvement documenting that one or more family members are active members of school-based PBIS teams (target is participation in 80% of meetings.) Score 70 or higher on the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ), or score 80/80 on the School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Use and submit the Self-Assessment Survey (SAS) Use and submit the Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers (BAT)

12. Exemplar (Con’t)  Outcome Data:  Provide two years of multi-tiered outcome data indicating that students have responded positively to PBIS implementation, demonstrate effectiveness of PBIS across all three tiers, and can be reported through the SWIS Triangle Data Report from the Year End Report or other comparable documentation: Tier 1/Universal behavior supports - 85% or more of all students have 1 or fewer office discipline referrals/ODRs, Tier 2/Secondary behavior supports - 10% or less of all students have no more than 2-5 ODRs, Tier 3/Tertiary behavior supports - 4% or less of students have 6 or more ODRs, and 5% or less of students have received out-of-school suspensions, and a small number of students are placed out of their home school. Note: Additional documentation and/or follow-up conversations may be needed to evaluate this discipline data.  Either: 1.A copy of documentation that demonstrates 80% of students are Meeting/Exceeding standards in Reading and Math on the ISAT for FY12, OR 2.A copy of documentation that demonstrates school is maintaining or making progress toward at least one school improvement academic goal (student outcome data).

13. Please Note  If your TAC has any questions regarding your application they may contact you

14. To Apply for Recognition  Choose the appropriate level of recognition.  See the website for more details: http://www.pbisillinois.org/schools/recognition-process  Use this color Key to compare your PoI to the levels of implementation: https://sites.google.com/a/pbisillinois.org/il-pbis-web/schools/recognition- process/PoI%204.0%20Color%20Key%20for%20Levels%20of%20Recognition%20Applicat ions%2010-11-12bcm.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1 https://sites.google.com/a/pbisillinois.org/il-pbis-web/schools/recognition- process/PoI%204.0%20Color%20Key%20for%20Levels%20of%20Recognition%20Applicat ions%2010-11-12bcm.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1  Download a copy of the application associated with your recognition level  Attach the required supporting documentation indicated on the application * Please remember to sign the application  Submit all completed materials by May 17, 2013, to the Illinois PBIS Network at: 335 N. LaGrange Rd., Suite 4, LaGrange Park, IL 60526

15. Acknowledgement  Please see our website for specific details on acknowledgements for each level of implementation:  http://www.pbisillinois.org/schools/recognition- process http://www.pbisillinois.org/schools/recognition- process