Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 1 Proposal of Synchronized Quiet Period for Incumbent User Detection Date: 2010-March.

Published byProsper Harper Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 1 Proposal of Synchronized Quiet Period for Incumbent User Detection Date: 2010-March."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 1 Proposal of Synchronized Quiet Period for Incumbent User Detection Date: 2010-March Authors:

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 2 Abstract This document proposes a Quiet Period synchronization mechanism for 802.11af to guarantee the detection of the incumbent user

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 3 Refer to FCC 08-260 page 103 “TV channel availability check time. A TVBD is required to check for TV signals for a minimum time interval of 30 seconds. If a TV signal is detected on a channel indicated as available for use by the database system, the device will provide a notice of that detection to the operator of the device and a means for the operator to optionally remove the channel from the device’s list of available channels” “In-service monitoring. A TVBD must perform in-service monitoring of an operating channel a minimum of once every 60 seconds. There is no minimum channel availability check time for in-service monitoring” FCC Rules Regarding Incumbent User Protection

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 4 Associating STAs with an AP in a BSS based on the STA’s supported channels Quieting the current channel so it can be tested for the presence of radar with less interference from other STAS Testing channels for radar before using a channel and while operating in a channel Discontinuing operations after detecting radar in the current channel to avoid further interfering with the radar Detecting radar in the current and other channels based on regulatory requirement Discontinuing operations after detecting radar in the current channel to avoid further interfering with the radar Requesting and reporting measurements in the current and other channels Selecting and advertising a new channel to assist the migration of a BSS after radar is detected Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS)

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 5 DFS has defined the procedure to quiet the current channel so the channel can be tested for the presence of the incumbent services However according to the procedure (11.9.1 IEEE Std 802.11-2007), the affected STAs are confined inside the same BSS or IBSS During the period when STAs in a certain BSS are quieted, STAs in an adjacent BSS may still be allowed to transmit As a consequence, in the quiet period which is supposed to be used to detect incumbent users, there might be signals from adjacent BSSs, which interfere the detection of incumbent users It is important to have a synchronization mechanism to guarantee the clearance of the quiet period for incumbent user detection Necessity of Synchronized Quiet Period

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 6 Illustration of the Problem BSS1 BSS3 BSS2 BBB BSS1 Quiet BBB BSS2 Quiet BBB BSS3 Quiet DS TV broadcaster

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 7 This is no need to mandate Timing Synchronization Function (TSF) for the STAs involved There is a means to allow APs exchange information using wireless or wired transmission The Quieting Channel for Testing function defined in 802.11 2007 will be used for each BSS to adjust the individual quiet period to align with the requested quiet period Assumptions

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 8 The purpose of the Quiet Period Synchronization is to guarantee a clear period that will not be used by any 802.11 STAs in the concerned area to meet the requirement of incumbent user detection specified by FCC A Quiet Period Synchronization request is sent by an AP to the APs that are members of the ESS as requested in the Quiet Period Synchronization The mechanism by which the list of APs in the ESS is determined is outside the scope of this amendment The mechanism and algorithm by which to decide which AP will send the Quiet Period Synchronization is outside the scope of this amendment The Quiet Period Synchronization request may be sent through wired or wireless connection Upon receiving the request, an AP shall respond whether it will perform the Quiet Period Synchronization operation Usage of the Synchronized Quiet Period

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 9 An AP requesting to start a Quiet Period Synchronization procedure shall send a Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame to the APs that are located in the concerned area The Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame contains a dialog token to distinguish requests from different APs The Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame contains the BSSID of the APs that the request is sent to The Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame contains requested timing information for quiet period synchronization –Quiet Period Offset: specify the time offset of the starting time of the quiet period relative to the reception of the preamble of the Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame –Quiet Period: specify the interval between two Quiet Periods –Quiet Duration: specify the duration of the Quiet period Requesting a Synchronized Quiet Period

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 10 An AP upon reception of a Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame checks the BSSID contained in the request and shall respond if the BSSID matches If the AP is able to adjust the quiet period according to the request, a positive response shall be sent back to the AP initiated the request If the AP is not able to adjust the quiet period, a negative response with the reason code shall be sent back the AP initiated the request Receiving a Request of Synchronized Quiet Period

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 11 Synchronized Quiet Period Request Frame Quiet Period Synchronization Request frame is a Public Action Frame CategoryActionDialog Token Protocol Information Element Quiet Period Synchronization Request Element 1123variable Octets:

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 12 Synchronized Quiet Period Response Frame Quiet Period Synchronization Response frame is a Public Action Frame CategoryActionDialog Token Protocol Information Element Quiet Period Synchronization Response Element 1123variable Octets:

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 13 Synchronized Quiet Period Request Element Quiet Period Synchronization Request element Element ID LengthRequest Token Quiet Period Offset Quiet Period Quiet Duration Optional Sub-elements 112212variable Octets:

14 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 14 Synchronized Quiet Period Response Element Quiet Period Synchronization Response element Element ID LengthRequest Token BSSIDResultReason code 112611 Octets:

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 1 Proposal of Synchronized Quiet Period for Incumbent User Detection Date: 2010-March."

Similar presentations

A Brief Introduction to the IEEE802.11h Draft

A Brief Introduction to the IEEE802.11h Draft
15-11-0394-00-04tv Mi-Kyung Oh etc., ETRI Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TV White Space.

tv Mi-Kyung Oh etc., ETRI Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TV White Space.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10-0289-00-00af Submission Mar. 2010 Chin-Sean Sum, NICTSlide 1 Summary of NICT’s Technical Proposals for TGaf Date: 2010-03-09 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE af Submission Mar Chin-Sean Sum, NICTSlide 1 Summary of NICT’s Technical Proposals for TGaf Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0509r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 72, 119 and 128 Qian ChenSlide 1 May 2014 Date: 2014-05-21.

Doc.: IEEE /0509r3 Submission Proposed Resolution to CID 72, 119 and 128 Qian ChenSlide 1 May 2014 Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/1065r0 Submission November 2005 Emily Qi et alSlide 1 Proposal for Load Balancing Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.

Doc.: IEEE /1065r0 Submission November 2005 Emily Qi et alSlide 1 Proposal for Load Balancing Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE 802.19-10/0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: 2010-07-14 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: 2013-03-08 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1054r0 Submission Sep. 2012 Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: 2012-09-07 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 1 STA Communication Inside a BSS and Outside the Context of a BSS Date: 2008-11-04.

Doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 1 STA Communication Inside a BSS and Outside the Context of a BSS Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0262r1 Submission March 2010 Ha-Nguyen Tran et al., NICTSlide 1 Requirements and Amendment Regarding TVWS Database Access Notice:

Doc.: IEEE /0262r1 Submission March 2010 Ha-Nguyen Tran et al., NICTSlide 1 Requirements and Amendment Regarding TVWS Database Access Notice:
Wireless LANs Prof. F. Tobagi 802.11 MAC Management 1.

Wireless LANs Prof. F. Tobagi MAC Management 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: 2012-03-05 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: 2015-07-04 Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.

Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0110r8 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: 2012-05-14 Authors: Date: May, 2012.

Doc.: IEEE /0110r8 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Frame Header Compression Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
Doc: IEEE 802.11-06/0388r0March 2006 Submission Kwak, Rudolf, InterDigital 1 BSS Channel Switch Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.

Doc: IEEE /0388r0March 2006 Submission Kwak, Rudolf, InterDigital 1 BSS Channel Switch Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.

Doc.: IEEE /0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1378r0 Submission November 2008 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Improving Multicast Reliability Date: 2008-11-11 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1378r0 Submission November 2008 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Improving Multicast Reliability Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0175r2 Submission June 2011 Slide 1 FCC TVWS Terminology Date: 2011-01-14 Authors: Peter Ecclesine, Cisco.

Doc.: IEEE /0175r2 Submission June 2011 Slide 1 FCC TVWS Terminology Date: Authors: Peter Ecclesine, Cisco.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2155r0 Submission May 2007 Jiyoung et al.Slide 1 Advanced Event Request and Event Report Notice: This document has been prepared to.

Doc.: IEEE /2155r0 Submission May 2007 Jiyoung et al.Slide 1 Advanced Event Request and Event Report Notice: This document has been prepared to.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google