Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAubrie Jocelyn Watkins Modified over 9 years ago
1
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CF Overview & Status Design Status CMGC Status Latest VE Decisions CF Total Estimated Cost Beneficial Occupancy Dates CF Organization Summary
2
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Design Status √ Title I - completed May 04 √ Interim services by JE between Title I/Title II – completed at the start of Title II √ Final Tunneling Memorandum and Geotechnical Investigation Report completed Jan 05 √ Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) awarded April 05 to HatchMott MacDonald
3
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Design Status – cont’d √ Title II AE Design Kickoff March 29-30 √ 30% design review was performed in Aug- Sept 05 Meeting was held at JE Cypress facility to review sum total of <1,000 comments from the various disciplines 100% civil design delivered Oct 26, 05 Road-work for North Access Road/Survey Tower Road Open excavation at EBD/FEE/NEH
4
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Design Status – cont’d 60% design review scheduled for Oct 28 (will likely be delayed ~ 3 weeks as a result of recent VE decisions) 100% design review Jan 18, 05 Progress drawings for design reviews are available at http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/lcls/cf/ When performing design reviews… A commitment for a timely review and response back to JE is necessary system mgrs citizen committees various groups and departments, i.e. CEF, ES&H, SU
5
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Design Status – cont’d 30% construction cost estimate delivered by JE Oct 4, 05 ($74.3M) Title I Estimate $50.2M DCN process was followed for all design changes to include estimated hard cost Valued at ~$3.5M 30% independent cost estimate delivered by WDWC Oct 7, 05 ($66.4M) Title I Estimate $72M Reconciliation report needs to be completed
6
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CMGC Status Approved! SO DOE Chicago DOE Washington DOE Awarded to Turner Construction (TC) Oct 17, 05 Phase I - $.6M Phase II - $12M Incentive Fee - $.55M Safety Schedule
7
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CM/GC Phase 1 Effort Phase 1 – preconstruction activities to include: Provide effective overlap period and oversight of effort during Title II Estimates during Title II CPM Schedule Identify lead-time for critical items Design coordination Constructability reviews Value Engineering reviews Site investigation
8
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d Develop construction bid packages Develop list and contact potential bidders Develop prequalification criteria Solicit bids Recommend award to SLAC for approval of subcontractor Award contract to subcontractors
9
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d Develop Project Management Plan (PMP) Construction Management Plan – outlines project scope, organization, and specific approach to accomplish project Project Safety Plan – project specific identifying job hazards, safety performance and individuals responsible for project safety Procurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and procedures for solicitation to subcontractors Quality Control and Assurance Plan – method of controlling time, cost and quality of various management tasks specific to the project
10
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CM/GC Phase 2 Effort Phase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials, labor, and services required to construct the Project All general conditions including field personnel, office staff, temporary offices, temporary construction, safety implementation, construction equipment, coordination of all subs, project administration, construction waste management, commissioning
11
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CMGC Status – cont’d Held Kick-off meeting Oct 19, 05 Delivered cost estimates from both JE and WDWC AE Design schedule Other data was relayed i.e. weekly Owner/Architect/Contractor (OAC) meetings, etc Critical message Safety First! Cost estimate for CLOC Construction sequencing, particularly the demolition of FFTB Civil work North Access Road Open cut Schedule of preparation of procurement packages for construction Remaining Phase II work
12
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 JE Est WDWC Est Cost Estimates Largest variance!
13
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Title II JE Cost Summary by CSI Title I Est $50M Title II Est $74.4M Variance $24.1M↑
14
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Title II JE Cost Summary by CSI Mechanical $8M (TI) vs $13.4M (TII) delta of $5.4M ↑ Site-work $4.2M (TI) vs $7.4 (TII) delta of $3.2M↑ Electrical $5.8M (TI) vs $12.8 (TII) delta of $7M ↑
15
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Title II JE Cost Summary by Area Areas with most significant increase: UH $4.3M →$10.9M NEH $6.4M →$9.6M CUP $395K →$2.8M XRT $3.8M →$5.7M FEH $6M →$10.7M CLOC $12.9M →$21.3M
16
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Title II Breakdown by Structure (with Area)
17
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Cost Estimate Delta results in reduction in scope of various items To date $11M worth of scope has been reduced Total value of items continue to fall short of remaining in the box by ~$3.6M
18
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 VE Scope Reductions - Tunneling
19
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 T2 – shorten xrt 60’ and access tunnel 40’ T3a – enlarge access tunnel to 19’ T5a/b – square off transition tunnel, shift FEH 60’ to the west (T2) T6 – cut/cover FEH (not approved) XRT/FEH Tunnel Floor Plan
20
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Architectural, Site, Finishes
21
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d
22
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 A01 – Delete masonry veneer NEH – Service Yard Entrance
23
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 A15 – Reduce glazing
24
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 A07 – 3 rd floor shell only, no interior build out CLOC Floor Plan 3 rd Floor
25
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 A12 – Eliminate Conf Ctr Conf Center Floor Plan Conf Center Elevation
26
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d
27
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 G08 – use pan form concrete NEH Cross Section
28
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 G10 – reduce size of basement level shaft NEH Floor Plan – Basement Level
29
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Architectural, Site, Finishes – cont’d
30
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 S06 – replace screen wall at CUP service yard w/ 8’ mesh fence Site Plan
31
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 S03 – reduce excavated bowl S04 – reduce retaining walls Site Plan - CLOC
32
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Mechanical Scope Reductions
33
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d
34
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d
35
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 M13 – place baseline UH design with alt plan
36
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Mechanical Scope Reductions – cont’d
37
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Electrical Scope Reductions
38
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Electrical Scope Reductions – cont’d
39
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Summary of Scope Reductions Tunneling - $.847M Architectural, Structural, General - $4.484M Mechanical - $3.782M Electrical - $1.762M Running Total = ~$11M All cost reductions have been approved by Systems Managers and Project Office.
40
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 BTHUNDULATOR HALLELECTRON BEAM DUMP & FEENEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL AND CENTRAL LABS & OFFICEX-RAY TRANSPORT & DIAGNOSTICS TUNNELFAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL (redesign) LCLS CF Rendering At grade in RSY Cut & Cover Location of Pep Ring Rd
41
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CF Cost Estimate – Aug 05 Total CF Cost = $80.6M
42
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Beneficial Occupancy Dates (L3 and L4) Sector 20 3/31/06 MMF 4/3/06
43
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 CF Staff FY 06-08
44
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Summary Open Issues… Prepare for upcoming Lehman visit on Nov 17, 05 Demonstrate readiness for CD-3 Review (7-9 February 2006) Title II 60% design review coming shortly (?) Geotechnical Baseline Report (GBR) in process, due in parallel with design by outside separate consultant Independent Seismic Peer Reviewer on-board and working with JE (Forell/Elsesser Engineers, Inc.) S20 and MMF to complete construction in the next 120 calendar days by XL Construction Changes will delay BO date
45
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 Summary – cont’d Turner Construction (TC) to begin full steam ahead Conduct cost estimate and major planning, conduct VE and constructability reviews, project schedule and develop bid packages Possible advancement Phase II effort RSY North Access Road [1] Memo was sent SSO requesting approval to commence this activity Open-cut of NEH area [1] ? Utility investigation? Title III Construction for RSY – CLOC by TC (03/06) MEP Technical Review will be required within the next 4 weeks Resolution to additional near future de-scope items
46
David Saenz FAC Review CF Design, Cost and Schedule Maturitysaenzd@slac.stanford.edu Oct 27, 2005 End of presentation
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.