1. By Benjamin Brizzolara Period: 4 1/13/2012

2. Analyze the similarities and differences in the methods used by Cavour and Bismarck to bring about the unification of Italy and Germany.

3. Nationalism is sweeping across the Italian States, the goal of a unified Italian Nation captivated many Italians. A leader for unification came from the Kingdom of Sardinia, strengthen by the passing of a liberal constitution by its monarch Victor Emmanuel (Fair degree of civil liberties & parliamentary gov. -1848) Early attempts of unification: Radical patriot Giuseppe Mazzini, wanted Universal male suffrage and the will of the people controlling gov. Catholic priest Vincenzo Gioberti, wanted a federation of the states under presidency of the pope Leadership of the autocratic kingdom of Sardinia- Piedmont (this option is perused)

4. Count Camillo Benso di Cavour (1810-1861) Sardinia-Piedmont Politian: limited and realistic Worked in secret with Napoleon III in attempt to drive Austria out of northern Italy (succeeded, Lombardy is received in 1859)  Napoleon abandoned Cavour in 1859 (resigned) Cavour’s achievements were positive, nationalist in central Italy called for fusion with Sardinia Returned to power in 1860 due to the moderate nationalist movement in central Italy Northern Italian State (Cavour's original goal) is reached

5. Giuseppe Garibaldi (1807-1882)  Superpatriot, by 1860 he emerged as an independent force in Italian politics (radical revolutionary nationalist)  Cavour is neutral to Garibaldi’s nationalism and republicanism (though he supported him secretly)  By May 1860, Garibaldi along with his guerilla fighters (Red shirts) sought to “liberate” the kingdom of Two Sicilies, they succeeded in gaining the Sicilian peasantries aspirations of nationalism, and took Palermo (Garibaldi is popular all across southern Italy)  Cavour, in fear of a war with France, the radical Garibaldi sacking Rome in the name of liberty and his popular appeal, organized local offices within the conquered territories  Garibaldi did not oppose Cavour, the people of southern Italy now wanted to join Cavour and Sardinia

6. *Unification is starting to take shape*

8. With Garibaldi now in check, Cavour successfully steered the new kingdom of Italy from popular nationalism towards a new conservative direction. Government is ruled as a parliamentary monarchy under Victor Emmanuel (neither radical nor democratic) Cavour uses diplomacy, skillful maneuvering and popular appeal in unifying Italy However: A social/cultural gap still remained between the industrial north and stagnate agrarian south Garibaldi and Emmanuel “seal the deal”

9. Aftermath of 1848 - German states are locked in a political deadlock German Customs Union (Zollverein) causes more tension between Austria and Prussia by 1848 1848, Prussia emerges with a parliament (somewhat), liberal middle-class rules it by 1853 William IV seeks military reform (bigger defense budget and higher taxes), liberal middle-class representatives in parliament wants society to be less militaristic - rejects military budget (1862) William sets up a ministry led by Bismarck to defy Parliament that same year.

10. Policies  Flexible and pragmatic in his polices  “One must always have two irons in the fire”  Kept his options open in policy after policy  Fashioned the “blood and iron” concept – using force to seek reform.  Reorganized army without parliamentary consent  “Might makes right”  Bismarck wants Austria out of the way, before the Austro-Prussian War Bismarck maneuvers Prussia away from causing a global war (neutralizing France and Russia) forcing Austria into a war on its own (when it came) Because of the events of 1848, Bismarck believed that the liberal middle class would prefer national unity under conservative leadership During the war with Austria, Bismarck identified Prussia’s fate with the “national development of Germany” attracting more of the liberal party within parliament to his belief

11. Austro-Prussian War of 1866  Lasted 7 weeks  Technology: utilizing railroads and breech loading needle guns  Austria defeated at the Battle of Sadowa  German Confederation is dissolved, Austria withdrawals from German affairs After the War North German Confederation is set up with Prussia as its leader (Bismarck’s original plan from the beginning of the war) Bismarck becomes chancellor of Prussia with William I as its president Bismarck makes peace with parliament, passing a new federal constitution By 1866 German unity was insight. Franco-Prussian War (1870- 1871)  Patriotic war with France would cause Southern German states to fall into Bismarck’s pocket  Using the issue of Napoleon III or William I becoming king of Spain as a diplomatic excuse, in 1870 war begins  Southern German states join Prussia (as Bismarck had hoped) and defeated the French army at Sedan on September 1, 1870 Paris falls in January 1871, ending the war Southern German states join the new German Empire  Bismarck is harsh: France is forced to pay for the war and cede Alsace and Lorraine to Germany French and German relations are forever tainted after 1871 German Unification is finally completed

13. Bismarck wants to prevent major powers from allying with France (bottom left)

14. Cavour Limited and realistic ideals Used mostly diplomacy and popular appeal Manipulated a revolutionary nationalist – Garibaldi – in the final stages of unifying Italy Allies himself with Napoleon III for support Italy is united on paper, a gap still remains between north and south culturally and economically “Blood and Iron” Using force to gain reform – “might makes right” Used extensive patriotism and nationalism to unify the German States and to expand Prussia Primarily using the military in the path to unification Sided with the liberals, eventually gained liberal support Accomplishments gave the German people pride in there nation and as a people. Bismarck

15. Steered popular nationalism into a conservative direction Used armed forces as a stepping stone towards unification Originally wanted a “Northern” state, jumped at the chance of national unification Both keep there options open Both ministers use some form of “blood and iron” (Cavour using Garibaldi, Bismarck using the Prussian army) Italy and Germany are ruled under a conservative parliamentary monarch

16. The similarities and differences in the unification of Italy and Germany is placed on what was available to the two ministers: the army, powerful allies, and the cry for nationalism. Cavour, a clever diplomat and devote realist who skillfully maneuvers the Italian government in and out of polices, and Bismarck who used his method of “Blood and Iron”, the Prussian army along with fierce nationalism of the German people. Making unification possible, successful, and ultimately a reality