Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKerry Austin Modified over 8 years ago
1
The social influence of competitive and cooperative emotions in nested social dilemmas 1 Hong Kong, 25.06.2015 Magdalena Rychlowska Job van der Schalk Antony Manstead
2
2 Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
3
Others’ emotions in resource allocation We are influenced by others’ decisions (Bicchieri & Xiao, 2009; Fowler & Christakis, 2010) … but also by their emotions! Anger and happiness (van Kleef, De Dreu, & Manstead) Regret and disappointment (van Kleef et al., 2006; Martinez et al., 2011) Cooperative and competitive emotions (de Melo et al., 2013; van der Schalk et al., 2015) 3 Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
4
4
5
The Nested Social Dilemma Paradigm 5 Wit & Kerr, 2002; Buchan et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2011 Individual level Subgroup level Collective level Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
6
Scenario 1 6 Ivorian employees British employees 6 Task: divide £500 between the three accounts Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
7
Manipulations of category salience C1: Me vs others C2: British vs Ivorians C3: Embassy vs other institutions Challenging access to health care Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
8
Study 1 and 2 144 students (123 F) & 150 paid participants (75 F) Does group framing affect participants’ allocations? Medians
9
Summary Consistently high allocations to the collective (UN) account Time-sensitive Loss vs gain frame Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
10
Scenario 2 South Street Butler Street 10 Task: divide £500 between the three accounts Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
11
Manipulations of category salience 11 C1: Me vs others C2: Butler Street vs South Street C3: Butler Street & South Street vs others Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
12
Study 3 161 students (125 female) – final sample: 138 Allocations as a function of group condition Medians Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
13
Study 4 : Emotion in NSD paradigms Cooperative vs competitive emotions Two parallel studies Out-group exemplar, low allocation to the collective No emotion Competitive (positive) emotion Cooperative (negative) emotion Control (allocations to the 3 accounts)
14
SVO matters Condition interacts with SVO in the Ebola scenario, F(3,76) = 2.75; p =.048. ControlLow allocation Low allocation + Positive emotion Low allocation + Negative emotion ** Hong Kong, 25.06.2015
15
Thank you
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.