1. Results, Discussion, Table, Figures RM Lab

2. Project Conduct a mixed factorial ANOVA Conduct a mixed factorial ANOVA GENDER (male vs. female) as your between- subjects factor GENDER (male vs. female) as your between- subjects factor CHARACTERISTIC (mentioned vs. not mentioned) as your within-subjects factor. CHARACTERISTIC (mentioned vs. not mentioned) as your within-subjects factor.

3. Project Design Male Female Ads with Characteristic Ads without Characteristic

4. Project Data File Number Gender Ads W Ads W/out 1 Male 4.23.9 1 Male 4.23.9 2 Female 1.22.3 2 Female 1.22.3 3 Female 3.76.8 3 Female 3.76.8 4 Female 6.55.7 4 Female 6.55.7 5 Male 2.35.9 5 Male 2.35.9 6 Male 7.04.6 6 Male 7.04.6 7 Male 3.76.8. 7 Male 3.76.8.

5. Results States the main results and findings States the main results and findings In terms of the APA-Style that you have done in your homework. In terms of the APA-Style that you have done in your homework. Include all graphs (figures) Include all graphs (figures) Report all relevant results, even those that do not support your hypothesis Report all relevant results, even those that do not support your hypothesis

6. Results Do NOT include individual scores Do NOT include individual scores Do NOT include any interpretation of the data or conclusions Do NOT include any interpretation of the data or conclusions

7. APA-style report: A two-way mixed factorial ANOVA was conducted with Strategy (shallow vs. deep) as the between-subjects factor, and the Item type (words vs. pictures) as the within-subjects factor. The results showed that the Itemtype was not significant, F < 1. The effects of Strategy were significant, F (1, 8) = 6.67, p <.05. However, there was a significant interaction between the strategy and the item type, F (1, 8) = 13.07, p <.05. Changing from shallow to deep strategy improved performance for the word recall only, but did not improve performance for the pictures.

8. Discussion Evaluate and interpret results and their implications Evaluate and interpret results and their implications Was your hypothesis supported? Was your hypothesis supported? What does this mean? What does this mean? How do these findings relate to existing literature? How do these findings relate to existing literature? Did you find something contrary to what others have found in similar research? Did you find something contrary to what others have found in similar research? Or were your findings the same as theirs? Or were your findings the same as theirs?

9. Discussion What have I contributed here? What have I contributed here? How has my study helped to resolve the original “problem?” How has my study helped to resolve the original “problem?” What conclusions and theoretical implications can I draw from my study? What conclusions and theoretical implications can I draw from my study? What were limitations of study? What were limitations of study? What should future researchers do in this area? What should future researchers do in this area?

10. Discussion Subsections First part (no subsection label) First part (no subsection label) Repeat findings and discuss why important Repeat findings and discuss why important 1-2 paragraphs 1-2 paragraphs Relate to existing literature Relate to existing literature Limitations Subsection (italicize) Limitations Subsection (italicize) Problems with the study/how should it have been done Problems with the study/how should it have been done Future Research Subsection (italicize) Future Research Subsection (italicize) What is the next step? What is the next step?

11. Discussion Layout Discussion The ggggg gggg ggggggggg t tttt ttt jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Limitation KKKKKKKKKKhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhh ddd dddddddddddddddddddddddd dddddddddddddddddddddddd dddddddddd Dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd Future Research HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH DDDDDDD ddddddddddddd ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd ddddddddddddd

12. Tables Include 1 table in APA style Include 1 table in APA style Means and SD of 4 groups Means and SD of 4 groups Label these groups Label these groups End of paper End of paper Refer to the table in your results section Refer to the table in your results section E.g., When you discuss significance, you can say: See Table 1 for the means and standard deviations of each group. E.g., When you discuss significance, you can say: See Table 1 for the means and standard deviations of each group. SEE HANDOUT IN FOLDER FOR EXAMPLE SEE HANDOUT IN FOLDER FOR EXAMPLE

13. Table 1 Means, Standard Deviations of variables VariablesMSD GROUP.6801.151 GROUP.170.461 GROUP.691.221 GROUP1.951.676

14. Figures 1 figure of interaction (even if it is n.s.) 1 figure of interaction (even if it is n.s.) Place after table Place after table Use figure caption page right before your figure Use figure caption page right before your figure Page with figure—just place it Page with figure—just place it Make sure your axis are labeled Make sure your axis are labeled Refer to the figure in your results section Refer to the figure in your results section For example: The interaction between ___ and ___ was significant (or not significant). See Figure 1. For example: The interaction between ___ and ___ was significant (or not significant). See Figure 1. SEE HANDOUT IN FOLDER FOR EXAMPLE SEE HANDOUT IN FOLDER FOR EXAMPLE

15. Figure 1. Interaction between ____ and _____.