Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeon Greer Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Where Do Transactions Come From? Carliss Y. Baldwin Harvard Business School Presented at Centre St. Gobain, Paris November 8, 2002
2
2 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Where this work fits into economics Samuelson, 1970: Consider a profit-maximizing firm that sells output along a demand curve…. [The] output is producible by … ninety-nine different inputs. … [T]he production function relating outputs to inputs is smooth and concave: 99 Max [R(v 1, …, v 99 ) – p j v j ]. v i 1 ∂R(v 1 *, …, v 99 *) / ∂v i = p i, (i = 1, …, 99). But where does the production function (99 inputs –> 1 output) come from? Who defined the products that are “the goods”?
3
3 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Transaction Cost/Incomplete Contracts Williamson, 1985: A transaction occurs “when a good or service is transferred across a technologically separable interface. … [R]arely is the choice among alternative organization forms determined by technology.” UpstreamDownstream “Technologically separable interface” In this literature, technologies and designs are fixed, asset ownership and decision rights move around.
4
4 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 But suppose designs and product definitions are not fixed a priori, Then, where do Transactions Come From?
5
5 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 But suppose designs and product definitions are not fixed a priori, Then, where do Transactions Come From? From the engineering design of a system of production…
6
6 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Our thesis: The modular structure of a system of production reveals the places where: –The division of cognitive labor is high, and –Mundane transaction costs are low. Transactions should go/can go only at those places.
7
7 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Outline of the paper T&T Network defined Mapping technique—TSM Encapsulation of T&T “blocks” Pinching the T&T Network Conclusion: Modular structure and mundane transaction costs
8
8 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Disclaimer We believe what we are saying is neither radical nor new Many predecessors: –Coase (1937) –Alchian and Demsetz (1972) –Barzel (1989) and North (1990) –Cremer (1980) and Aoki (2001) –Sako (1992) and Fixson and Sako (2001) We aim for a clarification of language.
9
9 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 The T&T Network Defined
10
10 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Task & Transfer (T&T) Network All tasks and transfers needed to complete production of artifacts in the economy Engineering Design is the work of designing the T&T Network Transfers are ubiquitous –Because “agents” have bounded cognition and physical capacity –True for both people and machines
11
11 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 What gets transferred? Material Energy Information –Data »Money or credit are a special form of data –Designs –“Tags” »Property rights and decision rights are a special form of tag
12
12 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Transfers are Dictated by technology Complex Logical Necessary (because of bounded capacity) Designed But not planned centrally
13
13 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Not all transfers are transactions A “transaction” requires –Standardizing transfers –Counting transfers –Payment for the units transferred These are extra and costly tasks – => “Mundane” Transaction Costs (MTC) MTC vary depending on complexity of transfers –Contingent, interdependent, iterative transfers are very complex –Hence such transfers are very costly to make into transactions
14
14 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Mapping the T&T Network
15
15 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Mapping Technique = “Task Structure Matrix” (TSM)
16
16 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 The Smiths and the Cooks
17
17 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 TSMs show where transfers occur, but not what gets transferred
18
18 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 TSMs reveal T&T “Bottlenecks” Transfer Bottleneck
19
19 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Bottlenecks = Transactional “Gateways” “Place Transaction HERE” — Few transfers; One-way transfers; Maximum “Division of cogitive labor”
20
20 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Bottlenecks = Transactional “Gateways” “Place Transaction HERE” — Because Mundane Transaction Costs are Probably Low
21
21 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Encapsulation
22
22 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Design Problem: If every transfer had to be a transaction, little work would get done.
23
23 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Solution: Transaction-free zones “Encapsulated Local Systems” –Predecessors: Families, communes, tribes (Marc Bloch) –Merchants and Proto-firms (Pirenne, Braudel, etc.) –Then: Full-functioned firms (1750s) and Limited-liability Corporations (1830s)
24
24 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Creating an Encapsulated Local System 1 Materials Energy People Machines Internal Flows are Designed by Engineers Data Agents and Resources Come In; Products Come Out
25
25 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Creating an Encapsulated Local System 2 Materials Energy People Machines Data All are Obtained Via Transactions $ $ $ $ $ $$$$ Internal Flows are Designed by Engineers
26
26 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Creating an Encapsulated Local System 3 Materials Energy People Machines Data Transaction- Free Zone: By design, many complex, contingent transfers occur inside the TFZ Internal Flows are Designed by Engineers
27
27 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Boundaries of the Capsule Materials Energy People Machines Data Boundaries = Where Transfers take the form of Transactions, according to the Design of the Enterprise Boundaries are Designed by Engineers, too!
28
28 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Financial Sufficiency Materials Energy People Machines Data When all Claimants Have been Paid… $ $ $ $ $ Revenue $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$ Money is left over! Costs:
29
29 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Financial Sufficiency = Survival in a Money/Market Economy Materials Energy People Machines Data When all Claimants Have been Paid… $ $ $ $ $ Revenue $$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$ Money is left over! Local System can survive. Costs:
30
30 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Encapsulated Local System = the “Kernel” of a Firm
31
31 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Encapsulated Local System = the “Kernel” of a Firm Why only “kernel”?
32
32 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Because… Can assemble several Encapsulated Local Systems within “a bigger firm” Can have transactions within “a bigger firm” Transaction costs/incomplete contracts/ property rights economics basically looks at different configurations of kernels within/across firms In practice, Mergers, Acquisitions & Alliances serve to adjust kernel boundaries across firms
33
33 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 In summary— Encapsulation is a technology in the engineering design of the T&T Network Encapsulation creates the kernels of firms Kernel boundaries are artifacts, which can be designed and re-designed (within constraints of physics and logic of technology) Mergers, Acquisitions & Alliances are visible adjustments of kernel boundaries
34
34 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 “Pinching” the T&T Network
35
35 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Mundane transactions costs are used to create a “more modular” task structure “Relational” or “obligational” contract needed “Mundane” transaction costs Standards: To Define “Gateway”
36
36 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 “Pinching” is an Investment In a Task Structure and Relationships that support a strict(er) partition of cognitive labor Value of “Pinching” = + Avoided cost of real-time interdependency/iteration (clt) – MTC (mundane transaction costs) + Free-riding (smaller unit, better individual incentives) – Upstream-Downstream opportunism (in supply chain)
37
37 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Conclusion
38
38 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Where do Transactions Come From? The modular structure of a system of production reveals where: The division of cognitive labor is high… and Mundane transaction costs are low.
39
39 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 The modular structure of a T&T Network Can be mapped using TSM graphs Transactions go at the “bottlenecks” of network –Transfers few and simple –Division of cognitive labor high Blocks need to be “transaction-free zones” –Encapsulated via transactions at the boundaries of the zone –Encapsulated Local Systems = Kernels of Firm “Pinching” can create a more modular structure –Costs = Mundane Transaction Costs –Standardizing, Counting, Valuing, Payment
40
40 © Carliss Y. Baldwin and Kim B. Clark, 2002 Merci de votre attention!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.