1. Service Differentiation for Improved Cell Capacity in LTE Networks WoWMoM 2015 – 10-13 June 2015, Boston - USA Presenter: Mattia Carpin (carpin@dei.unipd.it)carpin@dei.unipd.it Authors: Mattia Carpin, Andrea Zanella, Jawad Rasool, Kashif Mahmood, Ole Grondalen, Olav Osterbo University of Padova (Italy) – Telenor Research (Norway)

2. LTE High Level 2 Radio Access Network Core Network MME SGW HSS PGW SGi-LAN S11 S5 IP network eNodeB eNodeB, responsible for resource allocation both in downlink and uplink.

3. OFDMA allocation

4. Scheduling problem Opportunistic scheduling, for high cell spectral efficiency Fair scheduling, to provide similar service to all users

5. Schedulers’ metrics CQI Suitable constant for each user that depends on the average channel conditions Hybrid Opportunistic Fair Achievable bit-rate, computed according to the CQI

6. Previous work  In a previous work we simulated the behaviour of a Fair Throughput Guarantee Scheduler (FTGS)  α i is computed s.t. each UE gets in the long term the same throughput guarantee B What is the impact of cell edge users?  Keep the same average cell SINR μ, position UEs so that Δ increases Avg. SINR i-th user

7. Cell edge users’ impact

8. Class Based Scheduler

9. CBS assumptions  Assumptions: optimization interval  Constant population (N users) over the optimization interval  Rayleigh fading channel  Average user SINR known at the eNodeB  Classification according to the average SINR  Same G (bit/s) to users belonging to same class  We guarantee G i >G min using call-admission control mechanism  G b = G min G s > h G min G g = k G s  Under those assumptions we solve a system of 4N-1 equations that gives α for each user (if such α exists!) 9

10. Solving equations

11. Adaptation mechanism 11 Call admission control

12. Simulations  Circular cell of radius r meters, s.t. γ ( d = r ) = 2 dB  N users distributed over the cell area with uniform probability  Results obtained comparing CBS against  MTS, upper bound on spectral efficiency  PFS, simple hybrid scheduling policy  FTGS, equal guarantee to all users  Different G min = {50, 100, 150} Kbit/s

13. Results Admission control

14. Short term analysis But what in the short term?  Channel-dependent nature → short term behaviour influenced by the fading process ↔ Doppler spread  Single-class of users, target throughput η  We introduce the average achieved throughput ϑ over a time window of leght τ seconds Normalized gap

15. Short term gap PDF Long > ShortLong < Short

16. Variance of the PDF

17. K-factor for fitting

18. Excess probability  Suppose we have an application that needs to transmit L bits in T seconds  We define the excess delay probability as  This is the probability of not fullfilling the request of the application  Example: L/WT=0.2bit/s/Hz 18

19. Excess probability 19

20. Conclusions and future developments  Addressed Issues:  Dynamic algorithm for efficient resources allocation in LTE  Short term behaviour of the algorithm, PDF and relation with the channel conditions  Excess delay probability  A look into the future  Full implementation of the scheduler in NS3 Impact of the scheduler decision on the E2E delay Pre-compute and store the optimal parameters  Dynamic and real time estimation of the SINR  … 20

21. Service Differentiation for Improved Cell Capacity in LTE Networks Presenter: Mattia Carpin (carpin@dei.unipd.it)carpin@dei.unipd.it University of Padova (Italy) – Telenor Research (Norway) Any questions?