Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeon Green Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – Karnataka On 16.02.2010
2
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Karnataka (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009) Part-I Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
3
Questions? What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children- wise, in terms of No. of meal served? What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on 31.03.09 as well as 31.12.09? How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains? What is the level of lifting? How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level? How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost? How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
4
Contd ….., Questions? How much MME was utilized? Under what activities? What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2008 to 2009? How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
5
Benchmarks Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served) Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%) Availability of foodgrains [1.4.09 to 31.12.09]: 85% (+ or – 10%) Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [1.4.09 to 31.12.09]: 75% (+ or – 10%) Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed. Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous. State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines. Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
6
Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Meals ) No. of Meal (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (Primary + Upper Primary) Down by 0.14%
7
Non-Coverage : Number of Meals ( PY + U PY) Sl. No. Districts Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2009-10 ( In Cr.) Meals actually served during 1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009 ( In Cr.) Short-served No. of meals % Low 1 Davangere 3.21 2.73 0.4915% 2 Mangalore(DK) 3.21 2.81 0.4013% 3 Mysore 3.70 3.31 0.3911% Excess 4 Bijapur 4.12 4.75 0.6315% 5 Tumkur 3.79 4.12 0.339% 6 Chitradurga 3.00 3.23 0.238% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals.
8
Approval Vs Achievement: (Avg no. of children during 1.4.09 to 31.12.09) No. of children (In lakh) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (5% less)
9
Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Primary) Sl. No. DistrictsTarget as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2009-10 Average No. of children availing MDM during 1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009 Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Davangere 127642109872-17770-14% 2Mangalore(DK)122174106314-15860-13% 3 Mysore 148256129473-18783-13% 4 Chikkamagalur 6916561019-8146-12% 5 Uttara kannada 9641885845-10573-11% 6 Bellary 171514153020-18494-11% 1 Davangere 127642109872-17770-14% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals.
10
Sl. No. DistrictsTarget as per MDM-PAB Approval for 2009-10 Average No. of children availing MDM during 1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009 Difference No. of children % LOW 1 Davangere 82435 65059 -17376-21% 2 Bidar 71643 57698 -13945-19% 3 Mangalore(DK) 87836 71598 -16238-18% 4 Uttara kannada 61448 54230 -7218-12% 5 Raichur 62228 55566 -6662-11% 6 Bellary 83248 74351 -8897-11% 7 Mysore 93434 83964 -9470-10% 8 Mandya 68039 61431 -6608-10% EXCESS 9 Bijapur 74936 91149 1621322% Probable Reasons: - Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals. Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Up. Primary)
11
Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Working Days as on 31.12.09 ) No. of working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 4.6% excess
12
Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *: Including unspent balance as on 31.3.2009
13
Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *: Including unspent balance as on 31.3.2009
14
Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Foodgrains (in MTs) 100% 65% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
15
Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
16
Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Benchmark : 75% 1.45 Lakh MTs 1.04 Lakh MTs 0.94 Lakh MTs
17
Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
18
Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009) Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Benchmark :75% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Rs. 300.70 Cr. Rs. 212.70 Cr.
19
Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise) % Utilisation Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India State average: 65%(FG) & 71%(CC) Benchmark: 75%
20
Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of Food grains Sl. NoDistrict No. of Meals served [In Cr.] Expected consumption of Food grains (MTs) Actual Consumption of Food grains (MTs) Deficit in % Defeat Consumption 1 Gulbarga 6.897757.396415.5217% 2 Haveri 2.983544.962945.8617% 3 Bangalore (U) 4.865801.354903.0615% 4 Gadag 1.792126.151816.0315%
21
MME Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
22
Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (100%) (63%)
23
Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Sheds) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
24
Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Devices) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
25
Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. ComponentAchievementBenchmark 1. Foodgrains Availability 72%85% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 65%75% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 75% 4. MME Utilisation 100% 5. Kitchen Shed construction 43%100% 6. Kitchen Devices procurement 100% 7 QPRs received 2nos.3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
26
Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-11 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
27
Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) (Down by 0.51%) (Down by 4.08%) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
28
Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
29
Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 2010-11 (Proposed) Q-1Q-2
30
Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2009-10 (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *:SSA= Govt+LB+GA 2010-11 (Proposed) Q-1 Q-2
31
No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Sl. No YearAs per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions 12007-08216236 22008-09217 212 32009-10Not available 216 42010-11Not available 236 (State’s claim for 2010-11)
32
Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.