Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKristopher James Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 Governing Water Scarcity and Variability Case Studies from India presented at Climate Governance and Development Berlin 28-30 Sept., 2008 Joyashree Roy Professor of Economics Global Change Programme Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
2
2 Case Studies climate extremes, impacts, responses and development goal oriented water service provision
3
3 Following Development Goal can achieve both adaptation and mitigation with proactive action climate smart actions
4
4 Sustainability: Issues of Concern An issue of concern is that in which a state has not been performing well and hence is in need of good policies. Source: Roy, Chatterjee, Basak, Nandi (2007), Roy, Chatterjee, Basak (2008)
5
5 CC over arching challenge
6
6 Provides opportunity to Rationalise Developmental action
7
7 Facts: Weather extremes –Water quantity/volume –More precipitation/water in less number of days –Flood and drought –Source Augmentation, More Water storage and equitable distribution over longer period in a year –Problem more acute in urban areas with high and growing density –High temperature days: water quality, arsenic –BAU : Loss of water bodies, demand
8
8 Climate Extremes
9
9
10
10 Likely Impact on Growth and Development Flood and drought increases :Flood and drought increases : IndebtednessIndebtedness DissavingDissaving MigrationMigration InflationInflation Water borne diseasesWater borne diseases Flood is worse than droughtFlood is worse than drought Jadavpur University
11
11 Likely Impact on Growth and Development Incidence of loss are shared byIncidence of loss are shared by GovernmentGovernment NGOsNGOs CommunitiesCommunities HouseholdsHouseholds Jadavpur University
12
12
13
13 Water Safe Development Adaptation and Mitigation
14
14 Implementation Strategy Technical: progressed much but not sustained Institutional: urgent need
15
15 Incentives and Institutions to Ensure Sustainability and Universal Access
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19 Water use pattern by households Source: Socioeconomic Survey 2003-2008
20
20
21
21
22
22 Society bears the burden More private benefit More private cost
23
23
24
24 Provides opportunity to Rationalise Developmental action Integration of water supply service with water recharge, rainwater harvesting, sewerage, solid waste management
25
25 Climate smart building codes Urgent Immediate Action To go beyond energy codes only Water safe building codes for all new buildings : –Plumbing designs for individual water meters –Meter installation mandatory for all new connections –Rainwater harvesting –Water using appliance standard –Ground water recharge: Large Scale of operation for scientific, sustainable, quality
26
26 Governance Supply side –Mapping of existing resource –Source identification and ownership definition –Source augmentation –Technical efficiency: Electricity intensity UFW –Financial efficiency –Sustainability Demand side –Behaviourial incentive to reduce wastage –Incentive design for economic group wise equity in allocation –Integrated urban service charge but applicable with decentralised administration –To induce selection of right kind of technology
27
27 Beneficiaries do not pay Proportion of beneficiaries of the piped water service among total population: 82% Proportion of cost un-recovered: 83.7% Cost society pays : UFW (30-50%)
28
28 Mitigation potential no accounting for water supply and use Per day wastage of treated water: 103.2 MG, cost wise Rs 800 thousand lost /day Electricity required to produce 103.2 MG treated piped water: 108,478 units
29
29 Back of the envelope estimates Even if 20% population halves (50% reduction) emission, effect is going to be less but if 80% reduces by little more than 1% same benefit will be generated. Mitigation target 50:1?
30
30 Multi-criteria based Strategy WTP ATP criteria for basic amenities Access to Basic Minimum need Financial Sustainability Accountability of Service Provider
31
31 Value of water quality Cost of inaction (4% of HH Income) Rs 190 per capita per month on an average. In arsenic prone areas Rs 297 per month. Cost of action (2% HH income) The current cost of supplying filtered piped water to households is Rs. 50-130/- per month per household.
32
32 Immediate policy implementation is necessary for initiation of the Volumetric Water Charge System Exists: Meter technology Installation know-how Calibration know-how Need capacity building Does not exist: Policy Regulation Incentive Monitoring infrastructure
33
33 Thank you Jadavpur University
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.