1. Voters and Nonvoters in Canadian Federal Elections Michael D. Martinez University of Florida martinez@ufl.edu

2. Turnout in Canadian Elections Source: Michael D. Martinez. 2007. “Turning Out or Tuning Out? Electoral Participation in Canada and the United States.” In David Thomas and Barbara Boyle Torrey (eds.), Canada and the United States: Differences That Count. (Third Edition. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press). Chapter 16, p. 356.

3. Why has turnout declined in Canada? Generational (non-)replacement Generational (non-)replacement Pammett and LeDuc (2003, report to Elections Canada) Pammett and LeDuc (2003, report to Elections Canada) Younger voters particularly affected by decline in competition in local ridings Younger voters particularly affected by decline in competition in local ridings Johnston, Matthew, and Bittner (2007, Electoral Studies) Johnston, Matthew, and Bittner (2007, Electoral Studies)

4. Possible concerns about non-voting Do the unequal proclivities to vote on the part of some groups in society skew the policy preferences that are represented in government? Is low turnout indicative of declining political support for the regime?

5. Previous literature – Policy Skew? Some differences, but not much Some differences, but not much United States United States Wolfinger and Rosenston (1980, Who Votes?) Wolfinger and Rosenston (1980, Who Votes?) Bennett and Resnick (1990, AJPS) Bennett and Resnick (1990, AJPS) Gant and Lyons (1993, APQ) Gant and Lyons (1993, APQ) Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995, Voice and Equality) Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995, Voice and Equality) Canada Canada Rubenson, Blais, Fournier, Gidengil, and Nevitte (2007 Electoral Studies) Rubenson, Blais, Fournier, Gidengil, and Nevitte (2007 Electoral Studies) Martinez and Gill (2006, CJPS) Martinez and Gill (2006, CJPS)

6. Previous Literature – System Support Some differences between voters and nonvoters, but not much. Some differences between voters and nonvoters, but not much. Bennett and Resnick (1990, AJPS) Bennett and Resnick (1990, AJPS) Differences among voters Differences among voters Anderson and LoTiempo (2002, BJPS) Anderson and LoTiempo (2002, BJPS) Anderson et al. (2005, Losers’ Consent) Anderson et al. (2005, Losers’ Consent) Banducci and Karp (2003, BJPS) Banducci and Karp (2003, BJPS) Craig, Martinez, Gainous and Kane (2006, PRQ) Craig, Martinez, Gainous and Kane (2006, PRQ)

7. Questions Do nonvoters and voters in Canadian elections differ in policy preferences, not controlling for demographics? Do nonvoters and voters in Canadian elections differ in policy preferences, not controlling for demographics? Do nonvoters and voters for “losing” parties differ in their level of system support? Do nonvoters and voters for “losing” parties differ in their level of system support? Data from the 1997 and 2006 Canadian Election Studies. Data from the 1997 and 2006 Canadian Election Studies.

8. How much do you think should be done for Quebec: more, less or about the same as now? 19972006 NonvotersVotersNonvotersVoters More14.2%21.3%33.9%26.8% Same49.7%45.0%27.5%33.5% Less26.1%28.2%27.6%32.0% DK / Ref10.0%5.5%11.0%7.7% Tau c -0.020.03

9. Society would be better off if more women stayed home with their children. 19972006 NonvotersVotersNonvotersVoters Str. Agree17.0%22.8%22.6%17.1% Agree23.9%22.3%17.2%19.4% Disagree18.1%19.4%20.6%20.9% Str. Disagree38.2%32.4%35.0%38.7% DK / Ref2.8%3.0%4.6%3.9% Tau c -0.050.02

10. The government should leave it entirely to the private sector to create jobs. 19972006 NonvotersVotersNonvotersVoters Str. Agree11.8%15.6%12.7%11.0% Agree21.8%24.1%26.1%21.7% Disagree30.9%31.5%34.2%34.1% Str. Disagree28.4%26.2%19.2%30.3% DK / Ref7.0%2.6%7.9%2.9% Tau c -0.030.04

11. Over the past year, has Canada's economy gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? 19972006 NonvotersVotersNonvotersVoters Better28.0%35.7%25.3%44.6% Same38.9%43.0%46.1%39.1% Worse26.9%18.1%22.7%13.6% DK / Ref6.2%3.2%5.9%2.8% Tau c -0.07

12. Summary of Issue Differences 19972006 Voters higherTau c Voters higherTau c How much.. should be done for Quebec? More-0.02Less0.03 Society … better off if more women stayed home …Agree-0.05Disagree0.02 … leave it entirely to the private sector to create jobs.Agree-0.03Disagree0.04 Do you think Canada should admit more immigrants …?More-0.03More-0.03 Over the past year, Canada's economy …Better0.07Better0.07

13. Summary of Issue Differences 19972006 Voters higherTau c Voters higherTau c How much.. should be done for racial minorities? Same0.00More-0.01 Should Quebec be recognized as a distinct society? Yes0.02---- … would you cut taxes, increase taxes, or keep taxes as they are? Same0.01---- Gays and lesbians should be allowed to get married. ----Agree-0.04

14. Do nonvoters and voters in Canadian elections differ in policy preferences? No, nonvoters and voters in both 1997 and 2006 look pretty similar to one another in terms of their issue preferences. No, nonvoters and voters in both 1997 and 2006 look pretty similar to one another in terms of their issue preferences. Moreover, the attitudinal biases in voter participation that are evident do not appear to be especially stable over time in Canada. Moreover, the attitudinal biases in voter participation that are evident do not appear to be especially stable over time in Canada.

15. System Support by Vote Choice, 1997 Nonvoters Not Liberal Voters Liberal Voters Satisfaction w/ Democracy (pre, very or fairly) 53%54%74% Satisfaction w/ Democracy (post, very or fairly) 70%68%89% MPs lose touch (pre-, strongly agree) 38%41%29% I don't think government cares (pre, str. agree) 40%37%22%, str. agree) Politicians are ready to lie (pre, str. agree)56%55%39% Mean Feeling Thermometer Politicians36.943.151.2 Mean Feeling Thermometer Canada79.280.488.7 Mean Feeling Thermometer Canada (excluding Quebec) 84.087.689.6

16. System Support by Vote Choice, 2006 Nonvoters Not Liberal Voters Liberal Voters Satisfaction w/ Democracy (pre, very or fairly) 57.2%56.9%76.8% Satisfaction w/ Democracy (post, very or fairly) 72.8%83.6%82.6% I don't think government cares (pre, str. agree) 44.5%34.9%20.4%, str. agree) Politicians are ready to lie (pre, str. agree)61.5%51.9%37.3% Mean Feeling Thermometer Politicians41.953.755.8 Mean Feeling Thermometer Canada81.186.288.8 Mean Feeling Thermometer Canada (excluding Quebec) 83.789.288.7

17. System Support by Vote Choice, 2006 Nonvoters Not Cons. Voters Cons.Voters Satisfaction w/ Democracy (pre, very or fairly) 57.2%66.7%55.2% Satisfaction w/ Democracy (post, very or fairly) 72.8%79.1%89.9% I don't think government cares (pre, str. agree) 44.5%27.4%36.9%, str. agree) Politicians are ready to lie (pre, str. agree)61.5%46.4%50.6% Mean Feeling Thermometer Politicians41.953.755.1 Mean Feeling Thermometer Canada81.186.587.4 Mean Feeling Thermometer Canada (excluding Quebec) 83.789.588.4

18. Expected Values for “typical” respondent by Vote Choice, 2006 NonLibConsNDPBlocGrn Satisfaction w/ Democracy (pre) 0.07fairly1.14*fairly0.08fairly0.34fairly-0.10fairly0.13fairly Satisfaction w/ Democracy (post) 0.08fairly0.73*fairly0.81*fairly0.30fairly0.16fairly0.04fairly I don't think government cares 0.53agree-0.75**agree0.12**agree-0.18**agree-0.05**agree0.40**agree Politicians are ready to lie0.37S.agree-0.71**Agree0.05**S.agree0.03S.agree0.53S.agree0.26S.agree FT Politicians44.656.4*56.1*51.3*60.1*45.0 FT Canada86.092.2*90.3*93.8*80.1**88.2

19. Do nonvoters and voters differ in their level of system support? Most nonvoters, like most voters, were somewhat satisfied with the way democracy works in Canada, despite skepticism about the responsiveness of the government and the honesty of its officials. Most nonvoters, like most voters, were somewhat satisfied with the way democracy works in Canada, despite skepticism about the responsiveness of the government and the honesty of its officials. As in other democracies, “winners” were more supportive than “losers”, but nonvoters’ beliefs were not all that different from those of “losers.” As in other democracies, “winners” were more supportive than “losers”, but nonvoters’ beliefs were not all that different from those of “losers.” In a sense, these findings suggest that the decline in turnout in Canada does not appear to be an exit strategy on the part of the extremely disaffected, and they complement Johnston, Matthews, and Bittner’s (2007) conclusion that the lack of a competitive pull may be at the root of generation Y’s failure to enter. In a sense, these findings suggest that the decline in turnout in Canada does not appear to be an exit strategy on the part of the extremely disaffected, and they complement Johnston, Matthews, and Bittner’s (2007) conclusion that the lack of a competitive pull may be at the root of generation Y’s failure to enter.

20. Is the decline in turnout inconsequential? No, electoral outcomes can vary, under some conditions, under higher or lower levels of turnout. No, electoral outcomes can vary, under some conditions, under higher or lower levels of turnout. Moveover, the political institutions of liberal democracies ideally balance majoritarianism with the freedoms to express intensely held preferences. Moveover, the political institutions of liberal democracies ideally balance majoritarianism with the freedoms to express intensely held preferences. Higher turnout may one of several signals to elected representatives that the public is watching, and encourage them to be more attentive to its needs and faithful to its wishes.

21. If you’d like a copy of the paper … http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/martinez/cpsa08/martinez_cpsa08.pdf http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/martinez/cpsa08/martinez_cpsa08.pdf http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/martinez/cpsa08/martinez_cpsa08.pdf Or just go to http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/martinez/ Or just go to http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/martinez/http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/martinez/ Research and cv Research and cv Recent conference papers Recent conference papers Voters and Nonvoters in Canadian Federal Elections Voters and Nonvoters in Canadian Federal Elections Email: martinez@ufl.edu Email: martinez@ufl.edu