Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Draft Policies for the Bay Area’s Implementation of SB 375 ACT February 24, 2009 Ted Droettboom ABAG/BAAQMD/BCDC/MTC Joint Policy Committee.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Draft Policies for the Bay Area’s Implementation of SB 375 ACT February 24, 2009 Ted Droettboom ABAG/BAAQMD/BCDC/MTC Joint Policy Committee."— Presentation transcript:

1 Draft Policies for the Bay Area’s Implementation of SB 375 ACT February 24, 2009 Ted Droettboom ABAG/BAAQMD/BCDC/MTC Joint Policy Committee

2 Outline 1. Premise:How transportation and land use affect climate change. 1. Premise: How transportation and land use affect climate change. 2. Progress: How the Bay Area’s plans respond. 3. Prescriptions and Policies: How SB 375 changes the rules and how we propose to put it all together for the Bay Area.

3 Premise: Big Footprint/Big Impact Bay Area’s impact on the globe: Bay Area’s impact on the globe: Per capita carbon footprint 3 times the world average Per capita carbon footprint 3 times the world average Impact on Bay Area: Impact on Bay Area: Rising sea levels Rising sea levels More hot, smoggy days More hot, smoggy days Vanishing Sierra snow pack; water shortages Vanishing Sierra snow pack; water shortages More wild fires with particulate-matter pollution More wild fires with particulate-matter pollution

4 Premise: Transportation is Critical Green House Gases Compared Sources: USEIA, BAAQMD Transportation: 14% Transportation: 41% World Bay Area

5 Premise: Emission Standards Necessary but Not Sufficient

6 Premise: Location Matters Don Weden 1 gallon = 20 lbs. of CO 2

7 Growing Cooler: Compared to sprawl, compact development results in a 20 to 40 percent reduction in VMT and hence in CO 2 Premise: Location Matters

8 Premise: Location Matters Micro Climates Bay Area Temperature Gradient: As much as a degree per mile

9 Progress: Performance-based Regional Transportation Plan Target: Reduce CO 2 40% below 1990 levels by 2035 * Low fuel economy ** High fuel economy

10 Progress: Alternative Growth Patterns

11

12 Change in CO 2

13 Progress: FOCUS PDAs Nearly 60 jurisdictions Nearly 60 jurisdictions Over 100 areas Over 100 areas About 400,000 new housing units by 2035 About 400,000 new housing units by 2035 About 3% of region’s land area About 3% of region’s land area About 50% of projected regional growth About 50% of projected regional growth Priority Development Area Criteria: In existing communityIn existing community Near transitNear transit Planning more housingPlanning more housing >100 acres>100 acres

14 Prescription: SB 375

15 CO 2 Targets CO 2 Targets Models Models Sustainable Communities Strategy Sustainable Communities Strategy Alternative Planning Strategy Alternative Planning Strategy RHNA Integration RHNA Integration CEQA Assistance CEQA Assistance Prescription: SB 375 Basics

16 For 2020 and 2035 For 2020 and 2035 For cars and light trucks only For cars and light trucks only Adopted by CARB by September 30, 2010 Adopted by CARB by September 30, 2010 CARB must consider methodology recommended by broad-based advisory committee (RTAC) CARB must consider methodology recommended by broad-based advisory committee (RTAC) Regions may recommend targets Regions may recommend targets Prescription: CO 2 Targets for the Region

17 Policy: CO 2 Targets for the Region Participate fully in target-setting process Participate fully in target-setting process Seek targets that do not limit and do challenge Seek targets that do not limit and do challenge Seek unambiguous and accurate metrics to assess target achievement (e.g., VMT) Seek unambiguous and accurate metrics to assess target achievement (e.g., VMT)

18 New state guidelines will require that models account for: New state guidelines will require that models account for: The relationship among land-use density, automobile ownership, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) The relationship among land-use density, automobile ownership, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) The impact of enhanced transit service on vehicle ownership and VMT The impact of enhanced transit service on vehicle ownership and VMT Induced travel and development likely to result from highway and rail expansion Induced travel and development likely to result from highway and rail expansion Mode splits among automobile, transit, carpool, bicycle and pedestrian trips Mode splits among automobile, transit, carpool, bicycle and pedestrian trips Speed and frequency, days, and hours of operation of transit service Speed and frequency, days, and hours of operation of transit service Models required to be usable and understandable by the public Models required to be usable and understandable by the public Prescription: Models

19 Policy: Models Work together to construct integrated and transparent models which facilitate technical, decision-maker and public understanding of how land-use and transportation decisions can be coordinated to reduce CO 2 Work together to construct integrated and transparent models which facilitate technical, decision-maker and public understanding of how land-use and transportation decisions can be coordinated to reduce CO 2

20 Prescription: Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Forecast development pattern, accommodating all regional housing demand Forecast development pattern, accommodating all regional housing demand Integrated with transportation network and transportation policies and measures Integrated with transportation network and transportation policies and measures To achieve, to the extent practicable, CO 2 targets To achieve, to the extent practicable, CO 2 targets While also complying with federal requirements for RTPs (i.e., realistically attainable) While also complying with federal requirements for RTPs (i.e., realistically attainable) Part of (2013) Regional Transportation Plan (which must be internally consistent) Part of (2013) Regional Transportation Plan (which must be internally consistent) Not binding on local government land-use authority Not binding on local government land-use authority

21 Prescription: Alternative Planning Strategy (APS) Prepared if SCS is unable to meet targets Prepared if SCS is unable to meet targets Like SCS, but unconstrained by Federal realism requirement Like SCS, but unconstrained by Federal realism requirement Not part of the Regional Transportation Plan Not part of the Regional Transportation Plan Like SCS, must be reviewed by CARB, which certifies whether targets have been met or not Like SCS, must be reviewed by CARB, which certifies whether targets have been met or not Two purposes: Two purposes: Provides access to CEQA assistance Provides access to CEQA assistance Provides feedback to State on requirements for additional authorities and measures Provides feedback to State on requirements for additional authorities and measures

22 Policy: SCS/APS Achieve targets through the SCS Achieve targets through the SCS Use APS only as a last resort Use APS only as a last resort Assist SCS target achievement by: Assist SCS target achievement by: Partnering broadly Partnering broadly Directing TLC to PDAs no later than FY 2010-11 Directing TLC to PDAs no later than FY 2010-11 Programming funds jointly Programming funds jointly Prioritizing new funds for SCS achievement Prioritizing new funds for SCS achievement Advocating for state incentives Advocating for state incentives Seeking reasonable realism tests Seeking reasonable realism tests Advocating for pricing and related transportation authorities Advocating for pricing and related transportation authorities

23 8-year RHNA/Housing Element cycle, coterminous with every second Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) 8-year RHNA/Housing Element cycle, coterminous with every second Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) RHNA must be consistent with SCS RHNA must be consistent with SCS Housing elements must be adopted 18 months after adoption of the RTP Housing elements must be adopted 18 months after adoption of the RTP Zoning to implement housing element (including minimum densities and development standards) must be in place within three years of adoption of housing element Zoning to implement housing element (including minimum densities and development standards) must be in place within three years of adoption of housing element Prescription: RHNA Integration

24 Policy: RHNA Integration Develop SCS, RTP and RHNA together through a single and integrated cross- agency work program Develop SCS, RTP and RHNA together through a single and integrated cross- agency work program Report first to the JPC and then to responsible boards and commissions Report first to the JPC and then to responsible boards and commissions Form JPC subcommittees with expanded membership to facilitate broad vetting Form JPC subcommittees with expanded membership to facilitate broad vetting Reference interdependencies in all documents Reference interdependencies in all documents

25 Streamlining SCS- or APS-consistent residential or mixed-use projects Streamlining SCS- or APS-consistent residential or mixed-use projects Not required to deal with growth-inducing impacts, global warming impacts, or regional transportation impacts if incorporate mitigation from previous environmental review Not required to deal with growth-inducing impacts, global warming impacts, or regional transportation impacts if incorporate mitigation from previous environmental review Do not have to propose a lower-density alternative to deal with local traffic impacts Do not have to propose a lower-density alternative to deal with local traffic impacts Exempting Transit Priority Projects, subject to a number of conditions Exempting Transit Priority Projects, subject to a number of conditions Prescription: CEQA Assistance

26 Conditions for TPP Exemption: Be consistent with the general use designations, density, building intensity, and other policies of the adopted and approved SCS or APS, be at least 50 percent residential and, if the project contains between 26 and 50 percent non-residential use, have an FAR of at least 0.75; provide a minimum net residential density of at least 20 units an acre; and be within ½ mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor (15-minutepeak-period headways). A TPP will be totally exempt from CEQA if: It is no larger than 8 acres and not more than 200 units; It is no larger than 8 acres and not more than 200 units; It can be served by existing utilities and has paid all applicable in-lieu and development It can be served by existing utilities and has paid all applicable in-lieu and developmentfees; It does not have a significant effect on historical or environmental resources (e.g. natural It does not have a significant effect on historical or environmental resources (e.g. naturalhabitat); It has remediated any environmental hazards to applicable standards and is not subject to It has remediated any environmental hazards to applicable standards and is not subject to significant and defined catastrophic risks; It is not located on developed open space; It is not located on developed open space; Its buildings are 15 percent more energy efficient than required by California law and it is Its buildings are 15 percent more energy efficient than required by California law and it is designed to achieve 25 percent less water usage than the average household use in the region; It does not result in the net loss of affordable housing units in the area; It does not result in the net loss of affordable housing units in the area; It does not include any single-story building that exceeds 75,000 square feet; It does not include any single-story building that exceeds 75,000 square feet; It incorporates mitigation measures from previous environmental impact reports; It incorporates mitigation measures from previous environmental impact reports; It does not conflict with nearby industrial uses. It does not conflict with nearby industrial uses. AND if it meets at least one of following three requirements: 1. At least 20 percent of the housing units will be sold to families of moderate income, or not less than 10 percent of the housing will be rented to families of low income, or not less than 5 percent of the housing will be rented to families of very low income AND the developer commits to the continued availability of the non-market units (55 years for rental units, 30 years for ownership units); OR 2. The developer pays in-lieu fees equivalent to costs of meeting the first requirement; OR 3. The project provides public open space equal to or greater than five acres per 1,000

27 Policy: CEQA Assistance Develop a functional design for SCS, APS and associated EIR(s) to maximize appropriate and responsible CEQA relief Develop a functional design for SCS, APS and associated EIR(s) to maximize appropriate and responsible CEQA relief

28 Vet all regional-agency policies affecting the location and intensity of development or the location and capacity of transportation infrastructure through the JPC Vet all regional-agency policies affecting the location and intensity of development or the location and capacity of transportation infrastructure through the JPC Consult with neighboring regions to facilitate consistency of assumptions and policies Consult with neighboring regions to facilitate consistency of assumptions and policies Policy: Regional and Interregional Alignment

29 Our Challenge To achieve actual CO 2 reductions, not just forecast results and paper plans

30 The Job Location Challenge

31

32

33 More Information The Joint Policy Committee www.abag.ca.gov/jointpolicy


Download ppt "Draft Policies for the Bay Area’s Implementation of SB 375 ACT February 24, 2009 Ted Droettboom ABAG/BAAQMD/BCDC/MTC Joint Policy Committee."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google