1. Budget Overview Workshop September 21, 2009

2. 2% Scenario Adopted Budget Adopted Budget Reductions Colleges at 2%$1,654,000 Central Support Services at 6%1,848,000 Furloughs: 8 days (SEIU)495,000 Furloughs: 8 days (Local 39)128,000 Furloughs: 8 days (Administrators)248,000 Furloughs: 8 days (Confidential)50,000 PFT500,000 Part-time1,200,000 Workload reduction from State1,400,000 TOTAL$7,523,000

3. 2% Cuts 2% Reduction Colleges of Alameda359,000 Laney College638,000 Merritt College401,000 Berkeley City College256,000 TOTAL$1,654,000 Vacant Funded Faculty2,976,000 1351 Allocation13,308,000 Total Part-time Budget16,284,000 1351 Expenses (2008-09)17,467,000 TOTAL-$1,183,000

4. Workload Measures Base FundingMarginal Funding Base FTES Restored FTES Funded Growth FTES Stability FTES Total Funded FTES Unfunded FTES Actual FTES Credit FTES4,564.83 18,958.520.00574.000.0019,532.52305.4919,838.01 Noncredit FTES 2,744.95 455.460.00-162.910.00292.550.00292.55 Total FTES19,413.980.00411.090.0019,825.07305.4920,130.56 SOURCE: California Community Colleges 2008-09 Second Principal Apportionment (Exhibit C)

5. Base Revenues A. Basic Allocation $13,286,180 B. Base Revenue $87,792,548 1. Credit Base Revenue $86,542,330 2. Noncredit Base Revenue $1,250,218 3. Career Development College $0 C. Current Year Decline$0 Total Base Revenue Less Decline $101,078,728 SOURCE: California Community Colleges 2008-09 Second Principal Apportionment (Exhibit C)

6. Growth B. Constrain Growth Rate2.18% D. Actual Growth$3,567,537 E. Funded Credit Growth Revenue$2,620,188 F. Funded Noncredit Growth Revenue$-447,181 G. Funded Noncredit CDCP Revenue$0 Total Growth Revenue$2,173,007 SOURCE: California Community Colleges 2008-09 Second Principal Apportionment (Exhibit C)

7. Total Computational Revenue (Sum of Inflation Adjustment, Basic Allocation & Restoration, Growth, Other Revenues Adjustment, and Stability Adjustment) $103,251,735 Deficit Coefficient0.9851542446$-1,532,850 Adjusted Revenue Entitlement$101,718,885 SOURCE: California Community Colleges 2008-09 Second Principal Apportionment (Exhibit C)

8. District Revenue Source A1. Property Taxes $27,165,337 A2. Less Property Taxes Excess $0 B. Student Enrollment Fees $4,636,531 C. State General Apportionment $69,917,017 D. Total Available General Revenue$101,718,885 SOURCE: California Community Colleges 2008-09 Second Principal Apportionment (Exhibit C)

9. Other Allowances and Total Apportionments A. State General Apportionment $69,917,017 B. Statewide Average Replacement Cost $60,289 Number of Faculty Not Hired $0 Full-time Faculty Adjustment $0 C. Net State General Apportionment$69,917,017 SOURCE: California Community Colleges 2008-09 Second Principal Apportionment (Exhibit C)

10. Categorical Programs 2009-10 Preliminary Allocation (This allocations are based on the percentage of the 2008-09 budget indicated in the % column unless otherwise specified) FundProject% Alameda Laney Merritt Berkeley DistrictTotal 2008-09 allocation DSP&S250960$663,105$740,774$488,219$610,563$2,502,661 50%$331,553 $370,387 $244,110 $305,282 $1,251,331 EOPS230910$687,725$1,244,612$802,897$371,115$3,106,349 50% $343,863 $622,306 $401,449 $185,558 $1,553,175 CARE23090950%$83,173$294,872$192,008$56,884$626,937 $41,587 $147,436 $96,004 $28,442 $313,469 Matriculation130980$368,929$753,393$434,916$317,422$90,726$1,965,386 50% $184,465 $376,697 $217,458 $158,711 $45,363$982,693 CalWORKs210993$218,733$395,557$101,250$173,671$889,211$889,221 General Program$121,031$223,726$57,500$98,404 50%$60,516 $111,863 $28,750 $49,202$250,331 Childcare$92,702$171,831$43,750$75,267 50% $46,351 $85,916 $21,875 $37,634 $191,775 TANF21099450%$49,112$90,107$23,750$40,079$203,048 $24,556 $45,054 $11,875 $20,040 $101,524 CTE(VTEA)160951actual $145,520 $419,520 $258,505 $137,534 $48,078$1,009,157 Tech Prep160957actual $271,000 Finan Aid180926100% $240,329 $420,592 $262,132 $174,875 $1,097,928 Library120995Prelim $17,000 $68,000 Lottery170000Adv. Only $50,000 $200,000 Inst. Equip140997Prelim To be determined $0 $7,290,383$11,939,687

11. Areas of Flexibility Reduction2008-092009-102009-10 Allocation2008-09 Allocation Child Care Tax Bail Out50%$755,417$377,709 Equal Employment Opportunity50%$20,000$10,000 Economic Development50%$457,135$228,568 Apprenticeship50%$66,089$33,045 Part-time Faculty Office Hours50%$125,000$62,500 Part-time Faculty Health Insurance50%$50,828$25,414 Part-time Faculty Compensation50%$789,302$394,651 Transfer Education and Articulation50%$16,000$8,000 Matriculation - Credit50%$1,965,386$982,693 Matriculation - Noncredit50%$0 Physical Plant and Instructional Support50%$0 $4,245,157$2,122,579 This is the $4,245,157 less Matric that is above $2,265,683 Less Matriculation that is included above $982,693 $1,139,886 $14,205,370 $8,430,269

12. 2009-10 Preliminary Allocation for Matriculation %AlamedaLaneyMerrittBerkeleyDistrictTotal 2008-09 Allocation $368,929$753,393$434,916$317,422$90,726$1,965,386 50%$184,465$376,697$217,458$158,711$45,363$982,693

13. 2009-10 FTES Targets We are projecting being funded up to only 19,100 FTES for 2009-10. Our 2008-09 FTES was 20,300 resident FTES, we were funded for 19,800. That is a reduction of 1,200 FTES over what we served in 2008-09

14. 2009-10 FTES Targets

15. 2008-2009 Fall Comparisons Sept 9 2009SectionsStudentsClass EnrollmentRes FTES F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-)F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-)F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-)F08F09#(+/-)%(+/-) Alameda438419-19-4%6,2977,6331,33621%12,66216,1203,45827%1,5761,82925316% Laney960970101%13,50114,8351,33410%32,50937,2154,70614%3,4483,99054216% Merritt502434-68-14%7,2377,7965598%15,04216,5991,55710%1,9261,886-40-2% BCC461458-3-1%6,3737,4221,04916%14,04816,6332,58518%1,5821,81223015% District2,3612,281-80-3%27,96530,3372,3728%74,26186,56712,30617% 8,5329,517985 12%

16. FTES College Productivity Targets have been set at: 2009-102008-09 Alameda16.515.0 Laney17.316.5 Merritt16.014.5 Berkeley17.517.4

17. Productivity – How does it add up? FTES GoalFTES/FTEF# of FTEF Needed # of FTEF Available # of PT Faculty Needed Average Cost per PT FTEF 1351 Budget Needed 20,00017.5571.43400171.43$44,000$7,542,875 20,00016.5606400206$44,000$9,064,000 Additional expense in adjunct cost $1,521,143 21,21017.5606400206$44,000$9,064,000 $5,561,160

18. Per Campus as of Fall 2007 If:  Alameda is 18% of district enrollment  Berkeley in 18%  Laney is 43% and  Merritt is 21% Then for each 1 point decrease of FTEF/FTES the additional cost or savings per college is the percentage of $1,500,000  Alameda $270,000  Berkeley $270,000  Laney $645,000  Merritt $315,000 So when Merritt operates at 14.5 vs. 17.5 it cost $1 million more to produce the same FTES at Berkeley

21. Questions?