1. Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

2. Presentation outline Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions

3. Project Overview Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Pre sentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgments X.Questions Project Title: Function: Location: Building Size: Project Cost: Date of Construction: Delivery Method: Paint Branch High School Education Burtonsville, MD 349,000 SF $ 80,973,293 12/15/2009 – July 30, 2013 Modified CM @ Risk

4. Project Overview Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Pre sentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgments X.Questions Phase 1: Construction of the new facility Substantial completion date: June 1, 2012 Phase 2: Reconfigure Parking lots for staff & Students Substantial completion date: August 19, 2011 Phase 3: Abatement & demolition of old facility Substantial completion date: July 30, 2013 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 PB Phase Diagram

5. Project Team Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgments X.Questions Owner: Architect: Construction Manager: Civil Engineer MEP Engineer: Structural Engineers: Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) Moseley Architects HESS Construction + Engineering Services ADTEK Engineers B2E Consulting Engineers Wolfman & Associates Project Team

6. Overview of Analyses Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Analysis 1: LEED Certification Reviewing LEED scorecard for opportunities Analyzing opportunities for additional costs Analysis 2: Brick Façade Cost & Schedule impact to project Mechanical Breadth Structural Breadth Analysis 3: BIM Coordination Reviewing clash detection logs and case studies Determine cost and schedule savings to project

7. Analysis 1 – LEED Certification Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Green Schools Statistics Daylight: with brighter learning environments, test scores increase by 25% Ability to learn 20-25% faster on standardized tests Acoustics: Students score up to 20% higher on word recognition tests Poor acoustics cause distraction, which affects a students ability to learn Air Quality: Children miss 10 million school days a year due to asthma Poor air quality can cause mold growth and disease to spread LEED Version 2.2 Problem: State of the art High School LEED Gold Certified (43 Points) Research Goals/Methodology: Review LEED scorecard for opportunities Achieve LEED Platinum Certification (52 Points) Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

8. LEED Scorecard Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Sustainable Sites Credit 7.1 – Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof Placed 50% of parking under canopy Energy & Atmosphere Credit 2.1 – On-Site Renewable Energy Incorporated Wind Turbine on site Credit 4 – Enhanced Refrigerant Management Changed refrigerant to R134A Credit 5 – Measurement & verification Third Party to establish plan Indoor Environmental Quality Credit 1 - Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring Incorporated CO2 monitoring Systems Credit 5 - Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control Proposed entry grates at all major entrances Credit 7.1 - Thermal Comfort, Design Heating & Cooling loads to be calculated by ME LEED Credit Opportunities Sustainable SitesPoints Credit 7.1Heat Island Effect, Non Roof1 Energy & AtmospherePoints Credit 2.1On-Site Renewable Energy1-3 Credit 4Enhanced Refrigerant Management1 Credit 5Measurement & Verification1 Indoor Environmental QualityPoints Credit 1Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring1 Credit 5Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control1 Credit 7.1Thermal Comfort, Design1 Total Possible Points9

9. Credit 7.1 – Heat Island Effect, Non- Roof Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Requirements: 50% of parking spaces under deck/roof Material used must have a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) 2 of at least 29 Total Parking spaces: 355 Total Parking Spaces Required: 178 Total Parking Spaces Under Canopy: 188 = Single cantilever System = Double Cantilever System

10. Credit 7.1 – Cost Analysis Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions = Single cantilever System = Double Cantilever System Cost Analysis Canopy SystemTotal Parking SpotsTotal Linear FtCost/LFTotal Cost Single Cantilever47470$300 $ 141,000 Double Cantilever141780$600 $ 468,000 Total1881,250$900 $ 609,000

11. Complete Cost Analysis Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Analysis 1 Conclusion LEED Cost Analysis Sustainable SitesPoints Cost Credit 7.1Heat Island Effect, Non Roof1 $609,000 Energy & AtmospherePoints Cost Credit 2.1On-Site Renewable Energy1-3 $25,000 Credit 4Enhanced Refrigerant Management1 N/A Credit 5Measurement & Verification1 $55,000 Indoor Environmental QualityPoints Cost Credit 1Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring1 $123,200 Credit 5Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control1 $156,695 Credit 7.1Thermal Comfort, Design1 N/A Total Possible Points/Cost9 $968,859 Advantages:Disadvantages: Savings in operating Costs Increased Test Scores Cleaner learning Environment High Upfront Cost

12. Analysis 2 – Brick Façade Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Problem: Congested site Façade is primarily face brick Research Goals/Methodology: Contacting Prefab. Manufacturers Determine cost & Schedule impact with new system Current System: 4” face brick 1” Air Space 2” Rigid Insulation 10” CMU Proposed System: 1” face Brick 3.5” Polyurethane 4” Steel Stud 5/8” Gypsum Board 1” Membrane (2) ½” Fiberboard

13. Calculations Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Current System: 4” face brick 1” Air Space 2” Rigid Insulation 10” CMU Proposed System: 1” face Brick 3.5” Polyurethane 4” Steel Stud 5/8” Gypsum Board 1” Membrane (2) ½” Fiberboard Total SF of Brick: 108,000 SF Prefab. Panel Size: 12’ X 40’ = 480 SF Total Number of Panels Needed: 225 Panels Panels Installed Per day : 8-15 panels (5 man crew) Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

14. Façade Comparison Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Analysis 2 Conclusion Advantages:Disadvantages: Decrease in Project Schedule Minimize Site Congestion Better quality More Expensive System Schedule Savings: 139 Days – 19 Days = 120 Days (6 Months) Additional Cost: $4,320,000 - $2,226,960 = $2,093,040

15. Mechanical Breadth Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Wall Sections Comparison in R –values and U-values Calculate each systems heat transfer Conduct cost analysis between both systems Current System: 4” face brick 1” Air Space 2” Rigid Insulation 10” CMU Proposed System: 1” face Brick 3.5” Polyurethane 4” Steel Stud 5/8” Gypsum Board 1” Membrane (2) ½” Fiberboard Current System Proposed System

16. Current Façade Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Proposed Façade

17. Cost ANALYSIS Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Cost ANALYSIS Alternative Interior Finish: Changed CMU finish to Gypsum wall board Changed Rigid insulation to Polyurethane

18. Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions

19. Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

20. Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

21. Conclusion Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Analysis 1: Achieved LEED Platinum Certification Total Additional Cost - $968,859 Analysis 2: Additional Cost w/ Prefab System - $2,093,040 Savings in project schedule – 6 months Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh

22. Acknowledgements Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Academic Acknowledgements: Dr. Riley – CM Advisor Dr. Robert Leicht Dr. John Messner Penn State AE faculty Special Thanks To: Matt Evans (HESS Construction) Saurabh Gangwar (Hess Construction) George Houke (HESS Construction) Paint branch Project Team Acknowledgements

23. Questions? Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior Thesis Diab Shetayh Presentation Outline: I.Project Overview II.Project Team III.Overview of Analyses IV.Analysis 1 – LEED Certification V.Analysis 2 – Brick Façade VI.Mechanical Breadth VII.Analysis 3 – BIM Coordination VIII.Conclusion IX.Acknowledgements X.Questions Questions?