1. October In-Service MAP Information October 22, 2004

2. MAP Testing Schedule Spring 2005  Communication Arts - 3, 7, 11  Mathematics - 4, 8, 10  Science - 3, 7, 10 (voluntary – ???)  Social Studies - 4, 8, 11 (voluntary – ???)

3. MAP Testing Schedule Spring 2006 and 2007  Communication Arts 3 - 8, 11 3, 7, 11 – same type of tests (MC, CR, PE) but shorter3, 7, 11 – same type of tests (MC, CR, PE) but shorter 4, 5, 6, 8 – MC, CR only4, 5, 6, 8 – MC, CR only  Mathematics 3 - 8, 10 4, 8, 10 – same type of tests (MC, CR, PE) but shorter4, 8, 10 – same type of tests (MC, CR, PE) but shorter 3, 5, 6, 7 – MC, CR only3, 5, 6, 7 – MC, CR only  Science – 3, 7, 10 (voluntary – ???)  Social Studies - 4, 8, 11 (voluntary – ???)

4. MAP Testing Schedule Spring 2008  Communication Arts 3 - 8, 11  Mathematics 3 - 8, 10  Science - grade span (EL{5}, MS{8}, HS{11})  {recommended grade levels – not definite}  Social Studies - 4, 8, 11 (voluntary – ???)

6. Content Standards Report Years 2000 – 2004 Grade Level Content Area Looking for Trends

7. Content Standards Report Communication Arts 03 Communication Arts 03 Communication Arts 07 Communication Arts 07 Communication Arts 11 Communication Arts 11 Communication Arts

8. Content Standards Report Mathematics 04 Mathematics 04 Mathematics 08 Mathematics 08 Mathematics 10 Mathematics 10 Math

9. Content Standards Report Science 03 Science 03 Science 07 Science 07 Science 10 Science 10 Science

10. Content Standards Report Social Studies 04 Social Studies 04 Social Studies 08 Social Studies 08 Social Studies 11 Social Studies 11 Social Studies

11. Content Standards Report Content Standards Item Analysis Greater than 90% Grade Level / Content Area Communication Arts MathematicsScience Social Studies

12. GROUPS Communication Arts Science Sherry Tune (both) Julie Craig Vicki Stoops (both) Dena Keeling Carol Hawkins (both) Bob Irvin Brenda Atchison (both) Bill Holden Pam Nicholson (both) Junior King Karen Terrill Laura Olson Lisa Vaughan Sue Keeling Joni Appleton Johnny Collins Barb Jester Sandy Smith Jackie Cooper Chuck Conine Linda Barnett Angela McCully Vicki Grogan

13. GROUPSMathematics Social Studies Brenda Allen (both) Danny Smith Mindy Spurgin (both) Clark Howell Sondra Howell (both) Lisa Haynes Lisa Howell (both) Beth Williamson Sharon Davis (both) Karen Wright John Daniels Bill Wells Joni Irvin Brenda Smith Sue Conine Nancy Tippin Debbie Tune Jeannine Ross Karen Hampton Brad Shockley

14. Identify Areas of Concern “LIGHT IS A NATURAL DISINFECTANT”

15. Content & Goal Process Standards Item Analysis Less than 50% Grade Level / Content Area Communication Arts MathematicsScience Social Studies

16. What to Look For Reoccurring Item Benchmarks on Content Standards (pick three) Question Types Goal Process Standards that relate to Item Benchmarks Fill out Concepts & Applications Causing Low Achievement Scores (for three indicated above)

17. IT’S TIME FOR A BREAK!!!!

18. October In-Service Grade-Level Expectations October 22, 2004

19. Grade-Level Expectations Communication Arts – FINAL (updated 10-18) Organized according to Strand (reading, writing, listening, etc.); Big Idea (e.g., 1. Develop and apply skills and strategies to the reading process); and Concept (e.g., A. Print Concepts). Each GLE is aligned to the Show-Me Standards (content and process) and to benchmarks from the Frameworks for Curriculum Development. Glossary: http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/curri culum/commarts/GlossaryUpdateCBarr.pdf

21. Grade-Level Expectations Mathematics – FINAL (Mar ’04) Organized according to Strand (Number and Operations, etc.); Big Idea (e.g., 1. Understand numbers, ways of representing numbers,…); and Concept (e.g., A. Read, Write, and Compare Numbers). Each GLE is aligned to the Show-Me Standards (content and process) and to benchmarks from the Frameworks for Curriculum Development.

23. Grade-Level Expectations Science – NOT FINAL (mid-Dec) Organized according to Standard (1. Properties and Principles of Matter and Energy); Big Idea (e.g., 1. Changes in Properties and states of matter…); and Concept (e.g., A. Objects, and the materials they are made of, have properties…). Each GLE will be aligned to the Show-Me Standards (content and process) and to benchmarks from the Frameworks for Curriculum Development.

25. Grade-Level Expectations Social Studies – FINAL (updated 10-20) Organized according to Standards and Grade- Levels ( Grades K-4 – 1. Principals of Constitutional Democracy); Benchmark objectives for each standard are listed on the far left side and indicate how they might reasonably be placed in a K-12 curriculum. Glossary: http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/curri culum/GLE/ssglossary.pdf

27. Grade-Level Expectations Correlation Study Objectives Report Review Objectives to find how they correlate with the Grade-Level Expectations ASK – Does this fit??

28. Grade-Level Expectations Present Objective is Above and Beyond  BLUE Present Objective is Close  YELLOW Present Objective Does Not Match  PINK

29. To Do List Review areas of concern Put copies in your lesson book (keep it visible!) Revise curriculum throughout the school year Curriculum should be a living, breathing document Be flexible Change something – Cannot expect different results unless you change something!!

30. Where do we go from here?