1. South Lewis Central School District

2. Student Outcomes – Percent Meeting Common Core Expectations (District-Wide) ELA - Grade % Levels 3 and 4 BOCES Rank (17 Districts) Math - Grade % Levels 3 and 4 BOCES Rank (17 Districts) 3 rd 24%T103 rd 40%12 4 th 33%44 th 42%9 5 th 24%T85 th 29%T12 6 th 29%46 th 35%5 7 th 24%97 th 16%16 8 th 32%108 th 11%12

3. Student Outcomes – Scoring 65+ REGENTS EXAM 20132014BOCES Ranking for June 2014 Only Global Studies66.3%64.1%T17 US History85.7%88.7%9 Living Environment 86.1%93.8%11 Algebra88.0%67.4% English 1182.1%88.9% OVERALL81%79%

4. Special Ed. Classification % School Report Cards 2011-12

5. Free & Reduced Lunch % School Report Cards 2011-12

6. Student Outcomes – Percent Meeting Common Core Expectations NYSSouth LewisDifference 3-8 ELA - 2013 31.3%20.8%-10.5% 3-8 ELA - 2014 31.4%27.4%-4% 3-8 Math - 2013 31.2%22.8%-8.4% 3-8 Math - 2014 35.8%29.1%-6.7%

7. Why Growth? ─ Proficiency Based on this information alone, whose students had a better year?

8. By adding in prior performance (blue bars), we can see how much a student grew from last year to this year. With this additional information, now whose students had a better year? EngageNY.org ─ Proficiency

9. Growth Scores  Put students into groups with “similar students” across the state: Prior state exam scores Prior academic performance SWD ED ELL Begins at 4 th grade, because we need 3 rd grade results (prior scores) in order to make the “similar students” groups Idea is not did the child reach proficiency, but instead, where did each child come into the year, and compared to students like him/her across the state, how did they do at the end of the year:  Better than those like him/her (the child grew more than expected this year)  Equal to those like him/her (the child grew an average/expected amount this year)  Below those like him/her (the child didn’t grow as much as others this year)

10. Growth Scores

11. 0-2 Ineffective Well below average for similar students 3-8 Developing Below average for similar students 9-17 Effective Equal to state average for similar students 18-20 Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students

12. Building Growth Scores 2012-132013-14 PL1720 Growth from 3 rd Gr. state exams to 4 th Gr. ELA & math GF1713 Growth from 3 rd Gr. state exams to 4 th Gr. ELA & math MS1514 Growth each year, 5 th -8 th ELA and math HS1516 1-Growth on Algebra and English Regents and 2-number of total Regents passed for all students in high school (as compared to kids who scored like them on 7 th and 8 th state tests in ELA and math)

13. Student Outcomes – Graduation Rate GRADUATION RATE 201120122013 South Lewis HS78%83%86% South Lewis DISTRICT 72%75%78%

14. Student Outcomes – Graduation Rate GRADUATION RATE 2011 (Aspirational Measure) 20122013 South Lewis HS78% (39%) 83% (38%) 86% (29%) South Lewis DISTRICT 72% (37%) 75% (36%) 78% (26%) Aspirational Measure Regents with Advanced Designation – 22 units of credit and pass 8 Regents with a score of 65+, the 5 required Regents and Geometry, Alg II/Trig, and a Regents in a Physical Science (E. Sci, Chem or Physics)