1. Initiation and Evolution of the South Dakota Tornado Outbreak of 24 June 2003 Jay Trobec

2. 2 Issues that advance existing scientific work Determination of air parcel source region for this and other major tornado outbreaks in SD Anomalous tornado motion case #1: First tornado of the outbreak Anomalous tornado motion case #2: Warm sector tornadoes

3. 3 Gulf moisture→ thunderstorms -What link exists between mT air and large tornado days in SD? -Can we establish that link with a backward trajectory model? -How long does it take for tornadogenetic mT parcels to get to SD? Hagemeyer, 1991

4. 4 End point Trajectory analysis Ensembles

5. 5 Trajectory analysis Trajectories fail to link largest outbreaks and IA ag moisture (e.g. 16 June 1992, with 6 tornadoes in SD)

6. 6 LLM underestimated by META Temp: 30°C DP: 21 ° CTemp: 30°C DP: 25 ° C

7. 7 Anomalous tornado motion #1

8. 8

9. 9

10. 10 Anomalous tornado motion #1

11. 11 Anomalous tornado motion #1

12. 12 Anomalous tornado motion #1 Expected tornado location along RFD front Lemon and Doswell, 1979; Davies-Jones, 1986 °

13. 13 Anomalous tornado motion #2 Trochoidal curls Indiana – 3 April 1974, from Agee et al., 1976

14. 14 Anomalous tornado motion #2 “Unusual nonlinear movement” Cusps and curls documented in VORTEX Wakimoto et al., MWR 2003

15. 15 Anomalous tornado motion #2 Tornadoes move SE to NW while cloud bearing layer moved SW to NE

16. 16 Anomalous tornado motion #2 Very steep low- level lapse rates overcame lack of directional shear and boundaries KYKN 0z

17. 17 Anomalous tornado motion #2 Analagous to Fujita multiple vortex schematic

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22

23. 23

24. 24 Anomalous tornado motion #2 Most cases in where trochoidal motion is demonstrated in scientific journals, it occurs near the end of tornado lifecycle (and in many cases, before subsequent cyclic tornadogenesis) Here curtate cycloid motion caused tornadoes to produce damage paths semi-tangentially to translational storm movement from their outset Vortexes benefited from high SBCAPE and steep lapse rates in the lowest 2 km

25. 25

26. 26 Summary / revised abstract The outbreak that occurred in eastern South Dakota on 24 June 2003 provides an excellent opportunity for the study of tornadoes because they were significant in number, yet occurred in a small area over a short period of time. We performed a post-analysis of radar, computer model, and observational data pertinent to the outbreak to see what meteorological processes caused the outbreak to occur, and what factors contributed to sustaining tornado production and behavior during the outbreak. This analysis provided documentation of differences between the movements of tornadoes in comparison to their parent supercells. Specifically, a subset exhibited highly anomalous movement, with damage paths semi-tangent to the translational motion of the parent storm. We also compared the air mass source region of this outbreak to previous tornado outbreaks in South Dakota to determine the presence of precursor similarities.

27. 27

28. 28 Future work

29. 29 Workstation WRF 3 km grid 40,000 grid points 18 h simulation Initialized with EDAS, 1200 UTC 3 different convective schemes

30. 30

31. 31

32. 32 3 h precipitation

33. 33

34. 34 Extra

35. 35 SD Tornadoes

36. 36 Preexisting Conditions Third day of a three day severe weather event in Upper Midwest (stagnant trough) Why on Day 3, not on Day 1 or Day 2? 22 June 2003 23 June 2003 24 June 2003

37. 37 Reiman Index Gauges changing strength of the low level southerly flow (fetch) from the Gulf of Mexico Used to evaluate precipitation trends in the Midwest

38. 38 Trajectory analysis Tornado day #11 May 8, 1965 2100 UTC