1. Status of Municipal Education in Mumbai December 2013 Supported by FORD FOUNDATION 1

2. 2 Data from Household Survey Praja Foundation had commissioned the household survey to Hansa Research and the survey was conducted in March-April 2013 across the city of Mumbai with a total sample size of 6038 households.

3. 3 LanguageAllSEC ASEC BSEC CSEC DSEC E English86%96%91%82%85%67% AllSEC ASEC BSEC CSEC DSEC E Private83%95%87%84%78%68% Municipal17%5%13%16%22%32% Percentage of respondents with their children going to either private or Municipal School: Respondents whose current medium of education is other than English and would want to change to English medium 17% respondents have children in the household going to Municipal school. While, 78% from SEC D and 68% from SEC E are sending their children to private school. 86% respondents whose children’s current medium of instruction is in Indian Languages would prefer to go English Medium schools. 67% from SEC E section and 85% from SEC D of the current would prefer to go to English medium schools.

4. 4 AllPrivate SchoolMunicipal School Yes75%80%51% No25%20%49% Respondent taking private tuitions/coaching classes: Private SchoolMunicipal School School Class teacher15%14% Private tuitions68%64% Coaching classes15%20% Others2%3% 51% students from Municipal Schools take private tuitions / coaching classes Details on source of Tuitions: 14% students from Municipal schools take tuitions from their own school class teachers.

5. 5 Data from RTI

6. 6 Year No. of Candidates AppearedTotal PassPass in (%) MCGM School Private School MCGM School Private School MCGM School Private School Mar-0910,269155,3345,299125,72752%81% Mar-109,401159,6385,545131,33259%82% Mar-1111,515159,5726,806131,23059%82% Mar-1212,466164,5267,623136,18761%83% Mar-1312,856164,0107,658131,78560%80% Comparison between MCGM and Private School SSC Results Year2008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20122012-2013 Total Students 451,810455,900437,863439,153434,523 Dropout28,94429,46818,70032,58040,011 Dropout (per 100) 66479 SSC Passout5,2995,5456,8067,6237,658 in %52%59% 61%60% Total Number of Students, Dropout and Passout in Municipal Schools in Mumbai during the year 2008 - 2013

7. 7 Middle school Scholarship Examination (4th Standard) Year Candidates AppearedScholarship Holders Scholarship Holders in % MCGM School Private School MCGM School Private School MCGM School Private School 2011-129637219984320440.4%9.3% 2012-135426212232319540.4%9.2% High School Scholarship Examination (7th Standard) 2011-12716019227817580.1%9.1% 2012-13428320190616110.1%8.0% Comparison between Private and MCGM School: Scholarship Awarded 4th and 7th Standard

8. 8 Year Total Annual Budget (Rs. in crores) Total Students Per-capita Budget Allocation (in Rs.) 2008-09911451,81020,165 2009-101255449,17927,950 2010-111,761437,91140,213 2011-121,800439,10840,992 2012-132,388434,52354,961 2013-142,600434,52359,828 Annual Municipal Budgets and Per-capita spent on students

9. 9 Account Head Budget Estimate 2012-13 Actual expenditure 2012-2013 Budget Estimate 2013-14 Total Education Budget238818842600 Less: Grants to Private Primary aided School (D)254200283 Total213516832316 Total students (2012-2013)434523 Per Capita cost for every student (in actual rupees)491273874253309 Education Budget (Rs. in Crore)

10. 10 Deliberation by Councillors on Education in the year March’12 to March’13  134 questions have been asked on issues related to Education in year April’12 to March’13. In the last four years, April 2008 to February 2012, on an average 77 questions were asked on education by councillors in the earlier years. Compared to last year averages, 134 questions asked in 2012- 13 is very positive sign.  However there are still 164 (out of 227) councillors who have not asked a single question this year and another 35 councillors who have asked only one question on education.

11. 11 Evaluation of teachers, students & schools as per RTE

12. Ward Data 12 D WardM/East Ward P/South Ward No. of Students32695351016165 Dropout (Per 100)14912 Pass out (In %)62%38%58% No. of teachers1131147422 No. of whom inspection report available8054385 In 2012-13, just 0.4% (23 students) of those who appeared for 4 th standard scholarship exams and 0.1% (6 students) of 7 th standard from MCGM schools were awarded scholarships.

13. Teacher Evaluation Data 13 D WardM/East Ward P/South Ward Usage of examples, case study while teachingUsage96%95%98% Teaching Aids UseYes95%87%93% Student InvolvementGood78%76%64% Formative Evaluation Technique UsedYes93%96%95% Teacher Student InteractionProper81%80%62% Entries in the daily lesson plan and actual teachingComplete94%92% Self evaluation by the teacherGood54%65%48% Prepared test papered or question paperPrepared96%97%99% Teacher’s PortfolioGood41%52%66% Subject wise students responseGood61%71%35%

14. 14 Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) refers to a system of school-based assessment of students that covers all aspects of students' development introduced under Right to Education Act. Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) Wards4 th Standard (No. of students in %)7 th Standard (No. of students in %) Above 60% (A1, A2, B1, B2 grades) 60% to 40% (C1, C2 grade) 40% to 20% (D, E1 grades) Below 20% (E2 grade) Above 60% (A1, A2, B1, B2 grades) 60% to 40% (C grade) 40% to 20% (D, E1 grades) Below 20% (E2 grade) D47%14%16%8%58%26%9%6% M East44%15%12%13%64%18%9%8% P South41%11%20%11%58%24%15%3% E2 grade is given by MCGM to students who are continuously absent i.e. dropouts as earlier maintained. Note: From the CCE forms for few subject have not been filed. For details check the next slides.

15. 15 4 th Standard CCE forms data for 3 worst performing wards

16. 16 7 th Standard CCE forms data for 3 worst performing wards

17. Compliance of infrastructure norms under RTE 17 Indicator : Schools with Infrastructure Facilities Available Govt. and Local bodiesPvt. AidedPvt. Unaided Railway School (2) & Social Welfare (1) Total Schools12914396893 Building No.12914396893 %100% Office cum store cum HM room No.12913856443 %100%87.7%93.5%100% One class room for every teacher No.12322393183 %95.4%54.4%46.2%100% Ramp No.12914276513 %100%97.3%94.5%100% Separate Toilet for Boys No.12914396893 %100% Separate Toilet for Girls T No.12844396893 %99.5%100% Drinking Water Facility No.12914396893 %100% Kitchen Shed No.12914396893 %100% boundary wall No.12383836043 %95.9%87.2%87.7%100% Playground No.12913555473 %100%80.9%79.4%100% Mar-13SSC Passout MCGM7,658 Pass in (%) 60% Private131,78580% MCGM 4th Standard Scholarship Holders 23 Scholarship Holders in % 0.4% MCGM 7th Standard60.1%

18. What needs to be done 18  Learning outcomes need to be monitored.  Continuous Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) reports and Inspection reports need to be filled rigorously. These reports should be audited by third party and linked to performance appraisal of respective teachers.  Providing quality education is the duty of the Corporation. Quality of education should be the only paramount focus of the Corporation. And hence the measurement index should be comparative student performance.

19. THANK YOU !!! 19