1. Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)

2. 2 Continuous School Improvement Process

3. 3 To what extent does this represent your experience with School Improvement?

4. 4 Guided Conversations WHY:Why is it important to strategically implement, monitor, and evaluate the School Improvement Plan? HOW: How will we communicate the plan to all stakeholders so that they clearly understand and own their roles in implementation? How do we build ownership of the strategy and the plan? How will we ensure implementation with fidelity? How is the implementation of your plan monitored and evaluated? How is the impact of your plan monitored and evaluated? WHAT:What will your school look like when this plan is implemented with fidelity? What is the expected impact on student achievement? DO

5. 5 Do: Plan Requirements ESEA and PA 25 require annual evaluation of the following: Implementation of the plan Student achievement results by subgroup using data from state assessments and other indicators Modifications to plan as needed ISDs/RESAs are required by PA25 to provide technical assistance to schools and districts to develop annual evaluations.

6. 6 Plan Develop School Improvement Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

7. 7 Reflection What have you done to monitor the implementation and impact of your building/district plans?

8. 8 Implementation is a Process!  Monitor  Monitor Implementation  Evaluate Implementation  Monitor  Monitor Impact  Evaluate Impact Adult Focused Student Focused

9. 9 Leadership and Learning Center 2010

10. 10 MONITOR ADULT IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Formative) IS IT WORKING? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED AS INTENDED WITH FIDELITY ? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION ? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? Implementation: Adult FocusedImpact: Student Focused MONITOREVALUATE MONITOR

11. 11 Activities Connection to SPR 40/90, Interim SA/SA Getting Ready to Implement Implement Monitoring Fidelity of Implementation and Impact How will we address the targeted areas in your Process Data (SPP) ? What areas in your process data have been identified as challenge areas during your comprehensive needs assessment process? How will we ensure readiness for implementation? How will we ensure that staff and administrators have the knowledge and skills to implement? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Professional development around strategy Purchase materials Planning for implementation – Identify schedule for strategy use, personnel, mechanism for monitoring, rollout, etc. Communication vehicles How will we ensure successful opportunity for and implementation of the strategy? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Communication – to whom? How? Ongoing coaching? Observations? Instructional technology utilized? * Activities to support at-risk students (For Title One students)* Parent Involvement * *Required Components How will we ensure the strategy is implemented with fidelity? How will we monitor the impact on student achievement? POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES Walkthroughs PLC/CASL meetings Documentation of effective implementation Documentation of impact Demonstration classrooms, videos, self assessments Gathering achievement data

12. 12 Monitoring Monitoring Implementation and Impact Are you meeting on a regular basis to monitor implementation of your plan? What does the data say when you monitored implementation? What evidence have you collected to determine if adults are implementing with fidelity? What evidence have you collected to determine the impact of implementation? What adjustments are suggested by implementation and impact data? How might these adjustments affect the integrity of results? How will you communicate progress with stakeholders?

13. 13

14. 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17

18. 18 Checking for Understanding monitoring What are your questions about monitoring implementation and impact?

19. 19 Reflection What might you do to enhance the monitoring of the implementation and impact of your building/district plans?

20. 20 Plan Develop School Improvement Plan DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan

21. 21 Reflection What have you done to evaluate the implementation and impact of your building/ district plans?

22. 22 Implementation is a Process!  Monitor Implementation  Evaluate Implementation  Monitor Impact  Evaluate Impact Adult Focused Student Focused

23. 23 MONITOR ADULT IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Formative) IS IT WORKING? EVALUATE ADULT IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACT ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (Summative) DID IT WORK? ARE STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES BEING IMPLEMENTED AS INTENDED WITH FIDELITY ? ARE WE COLLECTING & USING STUDENT AND ADULT DATA TO MODIFY & ADJUST ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION? WAS THE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED AS INTENDED? DID WE IMPLEMENTTHE PLAN/STRATEGIES CORRECTLY & CONSISTENTLY? DID WE GIVE IT ENOUGH TIME? RESOURCES? IS WHAT WE ARE DOING WORKING? ARE WE SHOWING EVIDENCE OF STUDENT GROWTH? WHAT INTERIM ADJUSTMENTS ARE SUGGESTED BY IMPLEMENTATION DATA? HOW MIGHT THESE ADJUSTMENTS AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS? Implementation: Adult FocusedImpact: Student Focused MONITOREVALUATE MONITOR DID OUR STRATEGIES RESULT IN INCREASED STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (GOOD AND BAD) HAVE OCCURRED? SHOULD THE STRATEGY/ACTIVITY BE CONTINUED? DISCONTINUED? MODIFIED?

24. 24 IMPLEMENTATION  What evidence do you have that the strategy was or was not implemented with fidelity?  What evidence do you have that implementation adhered to strategies, timelines, and responsibilities? IMPACT  What impact has the strategy had on student achievement and what is the evidence?  What impact has the strategy had on subgroups and what is the evidence? Evaluating Implementation and Impact

25. 25 Evaluate Plan - Conclusion Given your evidence, what adjustments are needed to your School Improvement Plan, if any? What do we continue to do? What do we stop doing? What do we need to “tweak”?

26. 26 Evaluate Plan - Digging Deeper To what extent was this the right strategy/activity to address your need? What is needed to maintain momentum and accelerate achievement gains? Are the benefits of the strategy/activity sufficient to justify the resources it requires? How might these results inform the School Improvement Plan?

27. 27 Evaluate Plan  The process is cyclical, and evaluation data should inform the next cycle of planning.  The ultimate goal is to have improvement strategies take hold and become so internalized that they become part of the school culture.

28. 28 Checking for Understanding evaluating What are your questions about evaluating implementation and impact?

29. 29 Reflection What might you do to enhance the evaluation of the implementation and impact of your building/district plans?

30. 30 It is also critical that the School Improvement Team structure opportunities to celebrate successes, no matter how small. Celebrating successes reinforces valued performance and reminds the school community that however challenging, school improvement results in improved academic performance. One Voice – One Plan

31. 31 One Voice – One Plan However noble, sophisticated, or change enlightened proposals for change and improvement improvement might be, they come to nothing if teachers don’t adopt them in their own classrooms and if they effective don’t translate them into effective classroom practices.

32. 32 Guided Conversations WHY: Why is it important to strategically implement, monitor, and evaluate the School Improvement Plan? HOW: How will we communicate the plan to all stakeholders so that they clearly understand and own their roles in implementation? How do we build ownership of the strategy and the plan? How will we ensure implementation with fidelity? How is the implementation of your plan monitored and evaluated? How is the impact of your plan monitored and evaluated? WHAT: What will your school look like when this plan is implemented with fidelity? What is the expected impact on student achievement? DO

33. 33 Questions/Comments? Please contact:  Renie Araoz (Araozr@michigan.gov)Araozr@michigan.gov  Diane Fleming (FlemingD6@michigan.gov)FlemingD6@michigan.gov  Diane Joslin-Gould (Joslin-Gouldd@michigan.gov)Joslin-Gouldd@michigan.gov Or visit the MDE - School Improvement websiteMDE - School Improvement

34. 34 Renie Araoz – MDE/AdvancED Michigan Deb Asano - Marquette-Alger RESA Lisa Bannon - Wexford-Missaukee ISD Ben Boerkoel - Kent ISD Elizabeth Brophy - Calhoun ISD Deb Dunbar - Bay-Arenac ISD Scott Felkey - Oakland Schools Diane Fleming - MDE Linda Forward - MDE Lisa Guzzardo Asaro - Macomb ISD These training materials and resources were developed by the Michigan Continuous School Improvement Team. We deeply appreciate their time and support. Carrie Haubenstricker - Tuscola ISD Fiona Hinds - AdvancED Michigan Diane Joslin-Gould - MDE Scott Koziol - Michigan Center Public Schools Kathleen Miller - Shiawassee RESD Carolyn Rakotz - Wayne RESA Dodie Raycraft - St Joseph County ISD Karen Ruple – MDE Jennifer Sell-Sabsook - Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Kathy Sergeant - AdvancED Michigan