Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.

Published bySherman Greer Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization."— Presentation transcript:

1 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan Polk Transportation Planning Organization

2 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Topics Introduction Project Prioritization Transit Highways Non-Motorized Facilities Financial Resources Draft Cost Feasible Plan

3 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Introduction The Draft Cost Feasible Plan is a financially constrained version of the 2035 Needs Plan based on available revenue (federal, state & local) through the year 2035. The Draft Cost Feasible Plan contains the most important projects (priorities) indentified in the Needs Plan. These projects are the source for the TPO’s future priority projects.

4 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Introduction Staff is requesting the Board to review and approve the 2035 Draft Cost Feasible Plan. Public Review and Comment Period August 12 th through December 9 th. 2035 MVP Public Hearing and Final Adoption is scheduled for December 9 th.

5 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Transit Prioritization

6 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

7 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

8 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Eight Scoring Criteria: Previous Plans (2060 Plan, PTA Expansion) Regional Connectivity and Accessibility (Transit Centers/Park and Ride Lots) Transit Potential Urban Form and Planned Growth Public Input Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring

9 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Additional Considerations PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized: –Anticipated route productivity (ridership) –Available projected revenues –Public input –Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development

10 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Highway Prioritization

11 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Yellow indicates Change Since March

12 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County RoadFromToImprovement Type PhaseCost (YOE $M) Period US 98Manor DrCR 540-AWiden to 6LConst30.7072015- 2019 US 27N of SR 540N of SR 542 Widen to 6LConst25.4852015- 2019 US 98CR 540ASR 540Widen to 6LConst69.8252020- 2025 US 27Richie RdBarry RdWiden to 6LROW & Const 89.4872020- 2025 US 27Barry RdLake Co Line Widen to 6LROW & Const 148.0062031- 2035 Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)

13 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives Multi-Modal System Development Environmental Sustainability Regional Support Freight & Goods Movement Efficiency & Interconnectivity Safety & Security Public Input

14 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d) Candidate projects evaluated by whether they would: –Complete or fill gap(s) in system –Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities –Lie within specific designated areas –Address problems or enhance designated facilities –Satisfy need(s) expressed by public

15 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

16 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-motorized Transportation

17 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-motorized Facilities Top 100 Projects identified for: –Bicycle Improvements – typically done as part of road projects –Sidewalk Improvements – done as part of road projects or stand-alone enhancements Multi-Use Trail Projects –Typically done as funding & opportunities arise

18 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 PRIORITYROADFROMTOCOST 5CR 557*US 17/92I-4$1,560,461.30 9US 17/92 (SEVENTEENTH ST)*HINSON AVECR 547$126,970.00 19US 98*EDGEWOOD DRLAKE PARKER AVE$379,640.30 20US 98*SR 540EDGEWOOD DR$355,516.00 22US 98*LYLE PKWYCR 540A$812,608.00 36CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)*US 9210TH ST$634,850.00 51US 98*CR 540ASR 540$961,162.90 55SR 35 (BARTOW RD)*LAKE PARKER AVE SMAIN ST$152,364.00 $4,983,572.50 Cumulative Total for Top 100 Sidewalk Projects$51,750,305.63 Less Projects Included in Highway Needs$4,983,572.50 $46,766,733.13

19 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 PRIORITYROADFROMTOCOST 3CR 557*US 17/92I-4$1,721,239.98 24WABASH AVE S*ARIANA STUS 92$284,656.38 55US 17 (SIXTH ST NW)*6TH ST SW @ AVE A SWSR 544$465,559.50 64CR 542A (GALLOWAY RD)*US 9210TH ST$675,726.36 $3,147,182.22 Cumulative Total for Top 100 Bike Projects$39,960,967.14 Less Projects Included in Highway Needs$3,148,182.22 $36,812,784.92

20 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Financial Resources

21 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Total Funding = $2,109 M (YOE) DRAFT

22 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

23 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Highway Capacity Needs Estimated Costs (2016 – 2035, in PDC) Total Needs$5,918 M Cost Feasible Projects$1,819 M Difference$4,099 M DRAFT

24 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Central Polk Parkway PD& E study underway $30 to $36M needed to fund Design in Cost Feasible Plan Right-of-Way & Construction Unfunded Seek Additional Funding through: –Next SIS Plan- TRIP –Federal Earmark(s)- Private Sources –Toll Revenues

25 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Total Funding = $1,320 M (YOE) DRAFT

26 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

27 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

28 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Transit Needs (2011 – 2035)Estimated Costs (PDC) Total Needs*$3,214 M Cost Feasible Projects$1,004 M Difference$2,210 M DRAFT * Assumes operating needs phased in over life of plan

29 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Funding Set-Aside for Other Projects $80 M reserved for 2016 - 2035 For Congestion Management Projects, to be determined: –Sidewalk Projects –Multi-Use Trail Projects –Intersection Improvements –Intelligent Transportation System Enhancements

30 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Public Involvement – Outreach Public Workshops being scheduled for August & September Newsletter & Survey on Cost Feasible Projects Website - www.2035mobilityvisionplan.org

31 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010  Project Schedule Sept 2009 DecMar 2010 JuneSeptDec 2010 2011 Draft GOPs Draft Needs Plan Project Eval./Priorities Draft Cost Feasible Plan TPO Approves Draft Community Workshops TPO Adoption Final MVP Document August 2010

32 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010  Questions / Comments  Action Requested: Approve Draft Cost Feasible Plan for Public Distribution & Feedback  The Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees recommend that the TPO Board approve the 2035 MVP Draft Cost Feasible Plan.

33 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 End Presentation

34 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

35 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

36 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Project Evaluation CriterionAssessmentScoring (Points) Project Completes: Sidewalk Top 100In Top 100 = Y1 Sidewalk GapFills Sidewalk Facility Gap/Need = Y1 Bicycle Top 100In Top 100 = Y1 Bicycle Facility GapFills Bicycle Facility Gap/Need = Y1 Project Connects Directly to: AirportY=Direct Connection/Access1 Park & Ride LotY=Direct Connection/Access1 Transit CenterY=Direct Connection/Access1 Regional Intermodal HubY=Direct Connection/Access1 Regional Activity CenterY=Direct Connection/Access1 Freight Activity CenterY=Direct Connection/Access1 High Speed Rail StationY=Direct Connection/Access1 Project is Within: Environmental Justice (EJ) AreaF=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None F=2, P=1, N=0 Multimodal LOS DistrictDistrict I, II or IIIIII=3, II=2, I=1 Transit Supportive Development Area F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None F=2, P=1, N=0 Transit Corridors and Centers Overlay F=Fully Within, P=Partially Within, N=None F=2, P=1, N=0 100-Year Flood Hazard AreaH = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low H=0, M=1, L=2 ETDM Environmental Screening Tool Analysis: Potential Cumulative Degree of Effect H = high, M = moderate, L or blank = Low (see EST Results tab) H=0, M=1, L=2 Project Evaluation CriterionAssessmentScoring (Points) Project Enhances or Improves: Evacuation RouteY = Evac Route1 Regional Road NetworkY = on Regional Network1 Regional Transit RouteY = Serves regional or inter-county transit route 1 Strategic Intermodal System FacilityY = on SIS1 Major Truck RouteY = on Truck Route1 Major Road Network ConnectivityY = Makes New Connection between Major Roads 1 Current CongestionLOS D; LOS E; LOS F; all others = A- C (based on 5 yr LOS) F=5, E=3, D=1, A- C=0 Future CongestionVolume to Capacity Ratio (based on 2035 E+C Network V/C) >1.50 = 5, 1.25 to 1.50 = 3, 1.00 to 1.24 = 1, <1.00 = 0 SafetyTop 50 Crash Locations (2005 - 2009)# = Number of Locations intersected by project Public Involvement: Public Input on ProjectPublic comments received on facility or corridor (as of April 2010) # = Number of times cited as need in surveys Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology

37 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.) Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within: Wetland AreasRecreational Areas Wildlife & Habitat AreasPrime Farmlands Flood Hazard AreasHistoric/Arch. Sites Special Areas (e.g. Green SwampContaminated Sites

38 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 2030 TRIP2035 MVP CriteriaRelative WeightCriteriaRelative Weight Existing Congestion 12.5%Efficiency & Interconnectivity 20% Future Congestion12.5% Freight/Economic Competitiveness 20%Freight & Goods Movement 15% Community Impacts 10%Multi-Modal System Dev. 15% Environmental Impacts 10%Environmental Sustainability 20% Safety20%Safety & Security20% Project Status10%Regional Support5% Short-Term Need5%Public Input5% Total100%Total100%

39 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d) Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores Ranking based on weighted scores Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III

40 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Yellow indicates Change Since March

41 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Yellow indicates Change Since March

42 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

43 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

44 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

45 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

46 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010

47 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 FDOT Costing Tool Examples Project AreaDescriptionConstr. Cost Estimate RuralNew 2L Undivided Road w/ 5’ Paved Shoulder $4,524,370 per Centerline Mile UrbanWiden 2L to 4L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk $5,763,328 per Centerline Mile UrbanWiden 4L to 6L w/ 4’ Bike Lane & 6’ Sidewalk $6,349,351 per Centerline Mile RuralDiamond Interchange over Rural Divided Crossroad $24,659,686 per Interchange

48 Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 CapitalOperating State Hwy. Projects $5,117 M Local Road Projects$2,031 M Bus Transit Projects $180 M$51.9 M* Rail Transit Projects$1,824 M$21.4 M* Bike/Ped/Trail Projects Preliminary Cost Estimates (2010 $) * Annual Operating Costs At Build-Out

Download ppt "Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization."

Similar presentations

Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach

Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing

I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.

Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
US 101 Corridor Mobility Master Plan Agenda Item B-1 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Board Meeting August 6, 2014 – B-1.

US 101 Corridor Mobility Master Plan Agenda Item B-1 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Board Meeting August 6, 2014 – B-1.
Northwest Florida Transportation Corridor Authority.

Northwest Florida Transportation Corridor Authority.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.

The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
PSRC’s Project Selection Process February 6, 2015 1.

PSRC’s Project Selection Process February 6,
Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.

Cobb County Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Board of Commissioners Briefing January 22, 2008.
CRTPA FY 2013 - FY 2017 Priority Project Lists UPDATE.

CRTPA FY FY 2017 Priority Project Lists UPDATE.
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN 689-600 April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.

DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Steering Committee Meeting January 28, 2010 Polk.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Steering Committee Meeting January 28, 2010 Polk.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan July 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan July 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.

2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan CTC Meeting December 10, 2014 Bill Figge, Acting Deputy Director Planning and Modal Programs.

2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan CTC Meeting December 10, 2014 Bill Figge, Acting Deputy Director Planning and Modal Programs.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_042215 April 10, 2015.

King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.

DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
May 28, 2014. Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.

May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.

Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan June 2010 Steering Committee - January 28, 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google