Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Performance Monitoring Report - Testing Internet and EBnet networks between NASDA and various sites -

Published byEvelyn Anthony Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Performance Monitoring Report - Testing Internet and EBnet networks between NASDA and various sites -"— Presentation transcript:

1 1CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Performance Monitoring Report - Testing Internet and EBnet networks between NASDA and various sites - Network Subgroup - May, 2002 Shin-ichi Sobue NASDA/SPPD Kengo Aizawa RESTEC

2 2CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. - Purpose: to confirm network performance and plan new networks among the earth observation community. - Changes: NASDA upgraded the ATM Line Between Tsukuba and the EOC on Oct 27 th, 2001. 2M → 4M(bps) - Tools: tcpwatch, ping, traceroute Performance Monitoring (1) - Testing Internet Networks-

3 3CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. -Test Route A (From EOC to various sites via the Internet) a. Source Node: HEOC/NASDA: azusa.eoc.nasda.go.jp b. Destination Nodes: 1. GSFC/NASA: g0acg01u.eoc.nasa.gov 2. JPL/NASA : yngvi.jpl.nasa.gov 3. CCRS: ceodev.ccrs.nrcan.go.ca 4. CSIRO: terra.eoc.csiro.au 5. AIT: noaa.acrors.ait.th

4 4CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. NASDA IMnet APAN/ TransPac WIDE SGI NECTEC Abilene JPL AIT GSFC CSIRO ＴＫＳＣ Commercial Providers - Internet Routing - HEOC Upgrade 2M -> 4M CCRS Figure 1

5 5CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. - Test Route B (From Tsukuba to GSFC via the Internet) a. Source Node: TKSC (NASDA): tkes12.tksc.nasda.go.jp b. Destination Node: 1. GSFC: 198.10.49.61

6 6CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Summary(1): Test Route A azusa@HEOC - Madian Daily Throughput - (Median of Daily Maximums and Minimums) Destination Throughput ( Kbps) Period (mm/dd/yy) max. - min. 1. GSFC 1195 - 227 7/29/01 - 10/27/01 1191 - 212 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 2. JPL 1089 - 340 7/29/01 - 10/27/01 1211 - 293 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 3. CCRS 1273 - 6977/29/01 - 10/27/01 1294 - 664 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 4. CSIRO 608 - 171 7/29/01 - 10/27/01 595 - 181 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 5. AIT 874 - 1867/29/01 - 10/27/01 1026 - 131 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 There are wide margin between max. value and min. value due to heavy traffics a few times in a day. (as a result of MRTG between Tsukuba and EOC.)

7 7CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. - Median Hourly Throughput - (Maximum and Minimum of median of Hourly Values for Entire Period. See Figure2) Destination Throughput ( Kbps) Period (mm/dd/yy) (Max - Min) 1. GSFC 665 - 459 7/29/01 - 10/27/01 870 - 719 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 2. JPL 901 - 709 7/29/01 - 10/27/01 928 - 790 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 3. CCRS 1108 - 9557/29/01 - 10/27/01 1085 - 990 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 4. CSIRO 388 - 312 7/29/01 - 10/27/01 367 - 271 10/28/01 - 1/05/02 5. AIT 691 - 4117/29/01 - 10/27/01 824 - 456 10/28/01 - 1/05/02

8 8CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 2 This figure shows median of HourlyValues for Entire Period.

9 9CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Summary(2): Test Route B eagle@TKSC Destination Throughput ( Kbps) Period (mm/dd/yy) max. - min. 1. GSFC 2693 - 1206 8/25/01 - 10/27/01 2184 - 141510/28/01 - 1/05/02 Destination Throughput ( Kbps) Period (mm/dd/yy) max. - min. 1. GSFC 2586 - 2083 8/25/01 - 10/27/01 2117 - 202510/28/01 - 1/05/02 - Median Daily Throughput - - Median Hourly Throughput -

10 10CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Concerns Test Routes A (from EOC to each agencies) - After upgrading the ATM Line between Tsukuba and the EOC the average throughput improved and the maximums and minimums were more stable. [TKSC - GSFC(g0aeg01u), Figure 3] Test Routes B (from Tsukuba to GSFC) - After Oct 28 th on the TKSC – GSFC(198.10.49.61) route, both average throughput and hourly throughput fell by almost 20%. (Figure 4) (Traceroutes before and after Oct 28 th are shown in Figures 5.)

11 11CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 3 Average throughput improved

12 12CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 4 Drop (20% down)

13 13CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 5 Traceroute results Before Oct. 28 th, 2001 After Oct. 28 th, 2001 + About 40ms

14 14CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Performance Monitoring (2) - Testing EBnet Networks - -Purpose: to confirm network performance and plan new networks among the earth observation community. -Tools: tcpwatch, ping, traceroute

15 15CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. - Test Route C (From EOC to various sites via EBnet) a. Source Node: HEOC (NASDA):hdds4c11.eoc.nasda.go.jp b. Destination Nodes: 1. GSFC(g0eag01 ): g0acg01.gsfcb.ecs.nasa.gov 2. GSFC(gscsafs): gsfcsafs.nascom.nasa.gov 3. ASF: 192.107.193.23

16 16CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 6 EBnet Routing EOC JPL GSFC ASF 3M 5M 3M

17 17CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Destination Throughput ( Kbps) Period (mm/dd/yy) max. - min. 1. GSFC(goeag01) 1729 - 1333 8/26/01 - 3/02/02 2. GSFC(gscsafs) 1653 - 937 8/07/01 - 3/02/02 3. ASF 1604 - 991 9/23/01 - 3/02/02 Summary(3) : Test Route C hdds4cef@HEOC(EBnet) Destination Throughput ( Kbps) Period (mm/dd/yy) max. - min. 1. GSFC(goeag01) 1695 - 15698/26/01 - 3/02/02 2. GSFC(gscsafs) 1591 - 14418/07/01 - 3/02/02 3. ASF 1606 - 1360 9/23/01 - 3/02/02 - Median Daily Throughput - - Median Hourly Throughput -

18 18CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Concerns (continued) Test Route C - As it is shown in Figure 7, Max average throughput continues to be around 1700 Kbps. The transmission buffer size was increased, but the throughput didn’t improve.

19 19CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 7

20 20CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. - Internet The performance decrease on the APAN - Abilene route should be investigated. - EBnet We performed an FTP performance test over EBnet between EOC and JPL(137.78.31.81). The Average performance was around 2.0 Mbps and Max performance was 2.35 Mbps. The results of the FTP test and traceroutes in Figures 8 to 11 indicate there is not a problem between 202.251.177.12 and 202.251.177.186. The traceroute times between 202.251.177.186 and g0aeg01, gsfcsafs, ASF are rather long. Should they be investigated? Proposed Investigations

21 21CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 8

22 22CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 9

23 23CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 10

24 24CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Figure 11

Download ppt "1CEOS Subgroup Meetings May 7-10, 2002. Frascati. Performance Monitoring Report - Testing Internet and EBnet networks between NASDA and various sites -"

Similar presentations

GSFC to Alaska Performance Results Tino Sciuto Swales Aerospace ESDIS Network Prototype Lab. NASA GSFC Greenbelt, MD.

GSFC to Alaska Performance Results Tino Sciuto Swales Aerospace ESDIS Network Prototype Lab. NASA GSFC Greenbelt, MD.
Andy Germain Page 1 Toulouse, France May 2003 NTT-1 CEOS-WGISS-Network Task Team Network Performance Project Jeff Smith Virtual Andrew Germain Smaller.

Andy Germain Page 1 Toulouse, France May 2003 NTT-1 CEOS-WGISS-Network Task Team Network Performance Project Jeff Smith Virtual Andrew Germain Smaller.
JAXA network report JAXA/EORC Kengo Aizawa JAXA/EORC Osamu Ochiai.

JAXA network report JAXA/EORC Kengo Aizawa JAXA/EORC Osamu Ochiai.
Active Measurement Project on KREONET & APAN 2002. 1. 24 Manhee Lee Supercomputing Center Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information.

Active Measurement Project on KREONET & APAN Manhee Lee Supercomputing Center Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information.
Pathload A measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth Manish Jain, Univ-Delaware Constantinos Dovrolis, Univ-Delaware Sigcomm 02.

Pathload A measurement tool for end-to-end available bandwidth Manish Jain, Univ-Delaware Constantinos Dovrolis, Univ-Delaware Sigcomm 02.
Computer Networks Performance Metrics Computer Networks Term B10.

Computer Networks Performance Metrics Computer Networks Term B10.
Shin-ichi Sobue CEOS-WGISS-13 Page 1 Tokyo February 2002 Network Subgroup Report Shin-ichi Sobue NS Chair CEOS WGISS-13 Tokyo, Japan February 2002.

Shin-ichi Sobue CEOS-WGISS-13 Page 1 Tokyo February 2002 Network Subgroup Report Shin-ichi Sobue NS Chair CEOS WGISS-13 Tokyo, Japan February 2002.
5 December 2000 Measurements in Support of End-to-End Performance Matt Zekauskas, Campus Workshop San Diego, CA.

5 December 2000 Measurements in Support of End-to-End Performance Matt Zekauskas, Campus Workshop San Diego, CA.
Geolocation Les Cottrell – SLAC University of Helwan / Egypt, Sept 18 – Oct 3, 2010 Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal on Internet End-to-end.

Geolocation Les Cottrell – SLAC University of Helwan / Egypt, Sept 18 – Oct 3, 2010 Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal on Internet End-to-end.
© 2007 Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved.1 Computer Networks and Internets with Internet Applications, 4e By Douglas.

© 2007 Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved.1 Computer Networks and Internets with Internet Applications, 4e By Douglas.
Introduction to the Internet How did the Internet start? Why was the Internet developed? How does Internet handle the traffic? Why WWW changed the Internet.

Introduction to the Internet How did the Internet start? Why was the Internet developed? How does Internet handle the traffic? Why WWW changed the Internet.
High Performance Networking Update for the University of Maryland, the MAX GigaPoP and Partners CANS 2002 Mark Alan Matties, Ph. D. The University of Maryland,

High Performance Networking Update for the University of Maryland, the MAX GigaPoP and Partners CANS 2002 Mark Alan Matties, Ph. D. The University of Maryland,
Traffic Sensitive Active Queue Management - Mark Claypool, Robert Kinicki, Abhishek Kumar Dept. of Computer Science Worcester Polytechnic Institute Presenter.

Traffic Sensitive Active Queue Management - Mark Claypool, Robert Kinicki, Abhishek Kumar Dept. of Computer Science Worcester Polytechnic Institute Presenter.
Andy Germain CEOS-WGISS-NS-9 Page 1 Bangkok, Thailand September 2000 CEOS-WGISS-Network Subgroup Network Performance Task Team Andrew Germain CEOS WGISS.

Andy Germain CEOS-WGISS-NS-9 Page 1 Bangkok, Thailand September 2000 CEOS-WGISS-Network Subgroup Network Performance Task Team Andrew Germain CEOS WGISS.
ICFA Networking Task Force Workshop at CERN 23-25 March 1998 “Key updates since September 1997” in Hungary Piroska Giese KFKI-RMKI.

ICFA Networking Task Force Workshop at CERN March 1998 “Key updates since September 1997” in Hungary Piroska Giese KFKI-RMKI.
Chapter 11 Network Models. What You Need to Know For each of the three models: –What is the model? (what are given and what is to calculate) –What is.

Chapter 11 Network Models. What You Need to Know For each of the three models: –What is the model? (what are given and what is to calculate) –What is.
Ns Simulation Final presentation Stella Pantofel 304026354 Igor Berman 313879942 Michael Halperin 317321982.

Ns Simulation Final presentation Stella Pantofel Igor Berman Michael Halperin
What is Actual Internet Speed? Seung Il Lee Network Engineer NTT Com ICT Solutions.

What is Actual Internet Speed? Seung Il Lee Network Engineer NTT Com ICT Solutions.
 Frequency Spectrum and Bandwidth  Other Definitions of Bandwidth  Digital Signals.

 Frequency Spectrum and Bandwidth  Other Definitions of Bandwidth  Digital Signals.
TCP Behavior across Multihop Wireless Networks and the Wired Internet Kaixin Xu, Sang Bae, Mario Gerla, Sungwook Lee Computer Science Department University.

TCP Behavior across Multihop Wireless Networks and the Wired Internet Kaixin Xu, Sang Bae, Mario Gerla, Sungwook Lee Computer Science Department University.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google