1. AIRM Review Forum #2 Monday 12 th September 2011 Eurocontrol, Brussels Welcome by Joe Gorman, NATMIG/SINTEF, Norway CCB Chairman 1

2. Review Forum Meetings Review Forum #1Review Forum #2 Date11 th April 201112 th September 2011 Number of participants 18 (attended)54 (registered) Focus: AIRM What it is, purposeOverview of changes Details of key parts Focus: Governance Overview Role of AIRM Review Forum Brief overview Role of AIRM Review Forum 2

3. Agenda 3

4. What is AIRM Governance? 4 AIRM Governance: Procedures to decide changes to * Information Model * Consolidated Logical Data Model * Supporting documents

5. Scope of Governance Procedures to change models Procedures to change governance Notations to express models Practical tools, storage etc. issues Technical judgments about what domain information needs to be modelled Procedures used within domain-specific modelling projects 5 In Scope

6. CRs (Change Requests): core of Governance 6 Change Request (CR) A proposal to add a new model, modify the AIRM to fulfill some perceived need or modify governance Change Proposal A CR that contains specific details for exactly how to meet the need expressed in the CR FastTrack: true/false Status: CR approved, Reject, CR implemented, …….

7. Working in CCB Meetings Synchronous: Face-to-face Asynchronous: Online discussion forum Duration< 1 daySeveral weeks # ParticipantsProbably a subset of CCB members, partially depending on which CRs to be discussed Probably most members (since offline format does not require constant participation – easier to attend) ScopeAny CRs, but especially the controversial ones Only CRs, with status “FastTrack” (urgent or uncontroversial) 7

8. AIRM Review Forum: Role in Governance 8 AIRM CCB Meetings CCBS CCB Members AIRM Review Forum CCB = Change Control Board CCBS = Change Control Board Secretariat (from 8.1.3) 8.1.* Projects Disseminate information on Periodic reviews of AIRM Submit CRs on behalf of parties outside CCB Submit CRs Check that changes made as planned Implement Changes Organise and prepare inputs to Formal Decisions

9. Issues for “Open Floor Discussion” 9 “Open”  It’s up to you! Questions: seek better understanding of AIRM status and plans Questions & Suggestions: AIRM development approach / governance process Possible CRs (Change Requests): Indicate areas where CRs may be needed Frequency of AIRM Review Forum meetings + date of next meeting

10. Step 1 and Step 2 model should be separate? Level of detailing Relationship with FIXM/AIXM/WXXM and ICAO Link to services Link to SWIM Action Plan A meta-rulebook? Parallel sessions in future meetings Validation against operational requirements e.g. by operational experts

11. Reserve Slides 11

12. AIRM Change Control Board (CCB): Direct Involvement in Governance 12

13. Before submitting a CR Check existing CRs – may already be (partially) covered by an existing CR Possible to modify an existing CR (e.g. to add some details) Is the CR large/complex?  Consider split into several smaller Is it likely that the CR will have major impact on other projects?  Contact them and cooperate efforts to submit a combined CR 13

14. Decision Process 14