Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© Wiley 20051 Chapter 2 - Operations Strategy and Competitiveness Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 2 nd Edition © Wiley 2005 PowerPoint.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "© Wiley 20051 Chapter 2 - Operations Strategy and Competitiveness Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 2 nd Edition © Wiley 2005 PowerPoint."— Presentation transcript:

1 © Wiley 20051 Chapter 2 - Operations Strategy and Competitiveness Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 2 nd Edition © Wiley 2005 PowerPoint Presentation by R.B. Clough - UNH

2 © Wiley 20052 Learning Objectives Define the role of Business Strategy Explain how a Business strategy is developed Explain the role of Operations Strategy Explain the relationship between Business and Operations strategy Describe how an Operations strategy is developed Identify competitive priorities for Operations function Explain the strategic role of technology Define and compute productivity measures

3 © Wiley 20053 The Role of Business Strategy Defines the long-range plan to compete in the marketplace Helps to differentiate the firm from competitors Game plan upon which functional strategies are developed Focuses on doing the “right tasks”

4 © Wiley 20054 Business/Functional Strategy

5 © Wiley 20055 Three Inputs to a Business Strategy

6 © Wiley 20056 Examples from Strategies Mission: Dell Computer- “to be the most successful computer company in the world” Environmental Scanning: political trends, social trends, economic trends, market place trends, global trends Core Competencies: strength of workers, modern facilities, market understanding, best technologies, financial know-how, logistics

7 © Wiley 20057 Operations Strategy – Designing the Operations Function

8 © Wiley 20058 Competitive Priorities- The Edge Four Important Operations Questions: Will you compete on – Cost? Quality? Time? Flexibility? All of the above? Some? Tradeoffs?

9 © Wiley 20059 Competing on Cost? Typically high volume products Often limit product range & offer little customization May invest in automation to reduce unit costs Can use lower skill labor Probably use product focused layouts

10 © Wiley 200510 Competing on Quality? High performance design: Superior features, high durability, & excellent customer service Product & service consistency: Meets design specifications Close tolerances Error free delivery

11 © Wiley 200511 Competing on Time? Fast delivery: Focused on shorter time between order placement and delivery On-time delivery: Deliver product exactly when needed every time Rapid development speed Using concurrent processes to shorten product development time

12 © Wiley 200512 Competing on Flexibility? Product flexibility: Easily switch production from one item to another Easily customize product/service to meet specific requirements of a customer Volume flexibility: Ability to ramp production up and down to match market demands

13 © Wiley 200513 Are There Priority Tradeoffs? Which priorities are “Order Qualifiers”? e.g. Must have excellent quality since everyone expects it Which priorities are “Order Winners”? e.g. Dell competes on all four priorities Southwest Airlines competes on cost McDonald’s competes on consistency FedEx competes on speed Custom tailors compete on flexibility Can you have both high quality and low cost? e.g. Yes, Coke and Pepsi are good examples Can you offer design flexibility and short delivery? e.g. Yes, modular housing manufacturers do it

14 © Wiley 200514 Translating to Production Requirements Dell Computer example – structure & infrastructure They focus on customer service, cost, and speed ERP system developed to allow customers to order directly from Dell Product design and assembly line allow a “make to order” strategy – lowers costs, increases turns Suppliers ship components to a warehouse within 15 minutes of the assembly plant - VMI Dell set up a shipping arrangement with UPS

15 © Wiley 200515 Strategic Role of Technology Technology should support competitive priorities Three Applications: New product technology, process technology, and information technology Products - Teflon, CD’s, fiber optic cable Processes – flexible automation, CAD Information Technology – POS, EDI, ERP, B2B

16 © Wiley 200516 Measuring Productivity Productivity is a measure of how efficiently inputs are converted to outputs Productivity = output/input Total Productivity Measure Total Productivity = $sales/inputs $ Partial Productivity Measure Partial Productivity = cars/employee Multifactor Productivity Measure Multi-factor Productivity = sales/total $costs

17 © Wiley 200517 Productivity Example - An automobile manufacturer has presented the following data for the past three years in its annual report. As a potential investor, you are interested in calculating yearly productivity and year to year productivity gains as one of several factors in your investment analysis. 2003 2002 2001 Partial Prod. Measure Unit Car Sales/Employee 24.1 21.2 18.3 Year-to-year Improvement 13.7% 15.8% Multifactor Prod. Measures Total Cost Productivity 1.26 1.24 1.19 Year-to-year Improvement 1.6% 4.2% Which is the best measurement? 200320022001 Unit car sales 2,700,0002,400,0002,100,000 Employees112,000113,000115,000 $ Sales (billions$) $49,000$41,000$38,000 Cost of Sales (billions) $39,000$33,000$32,000

18 © Wiley 200518 Interpreting Productivity Measures Raw productivity calculations do not tell the complete story unless there are no major structure differences. In the prior automobile business example, it is obvious that some major changes were taking place to yield 15.8% and 13.7% year-to-year cars/employee productivity improvements. What changes could improve car sales per employee? Automation? Out sourcing? Major re-design? Is this partial productivity measurement enough to make an investment decision? Is the Total Cost Productivity measure a better reflection of year to year productivity at 4.2% and 1.6%. Why? Should you also look at productivity measures for the two major competitors for comparison?

19 © Wiley 200519 Productivity, Competitiveness, and the Service Sector A nation’s Productivity effects its standard of living Productivity is a measure of how effectively resources are used US productivity growth averaged 2.8% from 1948-1973 Productivity growth slowed for the next 25 years to 1.1% Productivity growth in service industries has been less than in manufacturing

20 © Wiley 200520 Chapter 2 Highlights Business Strategy is a long range plan. Functions develop supporting plans Strategy must address mission, environment, and core competencies Business strategy provides a guide for designing operations strategy Operations strategy must consider which competitive priorities are essential to meet business objectives Competitive priorities are cost, quality, time, and flexibility Companies must consider which product, process, and information technologies to use Productivity measures how effectively a firm is using resources Productivity is computed as a ratio of outputs divided by inputs

21 © Wiley 200521 The End Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United State Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.


Download ppt "© Wiley 20051 Chapter 2 - Operations Strategy and Competitiveness Operations Management by R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 2 nd Edition © Wiley 2005 PowerPoint."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google