Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Clarification “The Objective is measurable” – Any starting statement – And the Benchmark, Indicator, and Target are- part of the objective. – You don’t.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Clarification “The Objective is measurable” – Any starting statement – And the Benchmark, Indicator, and Target are- part of the objective. – You don’t."— Presentation transcript:

1 Clarification “The Objective is measurable” – Any starting statement – And the Benchmark, Indicator, and Target are- part of the objective. – You don’t need to have one honking great sentence cover everything in one go…

2 Sample Rewording University Transfer Students: The college will strive to increase the proportion of students attaining a transfer degree within 3 years of starting SCC. Further, we will determine the ratio of the transfer degree graduates who successfully transfer to a 4 yr institution within 4 years of starting at SCC.* – Note: We have no direct control over how a student does, once they get into a 4 yr institution. If student successfully transfers, the 4yr has made a determination that the student is ‘good enough for them’. Recommendation is to stop the objective at ‘when they leave here’.

3 Benchmark: Cohort: Headcount of new (to SCC) students enrolling in Fall 2006(x), identified as having a transfer intent. Measure1 – Number of Transfer degree Graduates from the Fall cohort as of (end of) Spring 2008(y), Divided by the headcount of the starting cohort. Expressed as a percentage. i.e. x/y % Measure2 – Number of transfers to a 4 yr institution as of Spring 2009(z), from the cohort Divided by y, and expressed as a percentage. z/y % Note: Spring 2008 = A894

4 Target: Cohort: Headcount of new (to SCC) students enrolling in Fall 2010(x), identified as having a transfer intent. Measure1 – Number of Transfer degree Graduates from the Fall cohort as of (end of) Spring2012(y) Divided by the headcount of the starting cohort. Expressed as a percentage. This will be 2% higher than benchmark. i.e. x/y% +2%. Measure2 – Number of transfers to a 4 yr institution as of Summer 2013(z) Divided by y, and expressed as a percentage z/y% + 3%. (i.e. 3% higher than benchmark)

5 Indicators: Measures taken in quarters between the Benchmark and Target start-end points. Indicator1: Quarterly measure of remaining students. Headcount of currently enrolled (sub)set of cohort (x) expressed as a percentage of the original starting headcount. Indicator 2: Quarterly calculation of average GPA of remaining students.

6 How I think! Yes, it’s true…I think! (Despite any empirical evidence you may have to the contrary…) How I got there

7 The Practical Application of “Cosmic Zoom” Or Drill Baby! Drill ! Or Going down the rabbit hole Or Playing with Russian dolls Take one Big problem challenge – Break it into two smaller pieces – Take each of the smaller pieces and break it into two smaller pieces… – Repeat as necessary. – For example. University Transfer Students. PseudoCoding

8 University Transfer Students Graduate SCCNot Graduate SCC Graduate <3Yrs Not Graduate <3 Yrs Transfer in <4 Yrs Not Xfer in 4 Yrs Xfer < 4 Yrs Not Xfer < 4 Yrs Xfer <4 Yrs Not Xfer <4 yrs JobNo Job Done

9 Not Transfer in 4 yrs JobNo Job Job Related to Study Job Unrelated to Study Studying elsewhere Not studying Done ?

10 University Transfer Students Graduate SCC Graduate <3Yrs !Graduate < 3 Yrs Xfer < 4 Yrs !Xfer < 4yrs Xfer <4 Yrs Done The ‘Final’ cut

11 Sample Rewording University Transfer Students: The college will strive to increase the proportion of students attaining a transfer degree within 3 years of starting SCC. Further, we will determine the ratio of the transfer degree graduates who successfully transfer to a 4 yr institution within 4 years of starting. – Note: We have no direct control over how a student does, once they get into a 4 yr institution. If student successfully transfers, the 4yr has made a determination that the student is ‘good enough for them’. Recommendation is to stop the objective at ‘when they leave here’.

12 Summary Goals are fuzzy Objectives are measurable. – They should be SMART – And have Benchmarks, Targets, and probably Indicators. S.M.A.R.T. – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound.

13 Definitions! Goals are ‘Big Picture’ statements that are generally not measurable Objectives are SMART Indicators are driven by the Objectives and are measurable They are signposts toward the objective. Note: Indicators may look like benchmarks. Benchmarks are driven by the Objectives and are measurable A Benchmark defines your starting point. Targets are what you want the next benchmark to show and are measurable. It should mirror the Benchmark in format.


Download ppt "Clarification “The Objective is measurable” – Any starting statement – And the Benchmark, Indicator, and Target are- part of the objective. – You don’t."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google