Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf."— Presentation transcript:

1 Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf F. Barth, Claudia Turro, Alycia M. Palmer, Erica H. Bell and Xiaokui Mo

2 Outline of presentation Background: X-ray radiotherapy and how can we improve it? Low energy 160 kV vs 6000 kV (6 MV) X-rays What is radiosensitization? enhancing X-ray dose with heavy elements to kill malignant cells Monte Carlo simulations on radiosensitization using heavy elements (high atomic number Z or HZ – review from earlier presentation). Experiments: promising in vitro results In vivo experiments in progress

3 Current Radiotherapy 6 MV clinical linac (Varian Clinac) unfiltered spectrum: ~0-6000 keV (6 MeV) X-rays can not differentiate between tumor tissues and healthy tissues with or with out radiosensitization Reason for use: penetration

4 What if there was a way to increase the damage to tumor tissues that more than makes up for the lack of penetration? There is! With heavy element radiosensitization!

5 Dose Enhancement Factors Geant4 results using 7ug/ml Pt for increase in dose deposition as a function of X-ray energy 160 kV 6 MV

6 In vitro experiments F98 rat glioma cells: Radiosensitized with relatively non- toxic HZ radiosensitizer or carboplatin Irradiated with either 6 MV or 160 kV X- rays to test changes in surviving fraction (SF)

7 In vitro analysis Methods and materials Clonogenic assay with Pt-sensitized F98 cells after broadband X-ray irradiation (160 kV Vs 6 MV, 7 Gy) 1. 2. Radiosensitizers: Pyridine Terpyridine Pt(II) complex (typ-Pt) - low in vitro toxicity - allows decoupling of chemotoxicity and radiotoxicity - unexpectedly cytotoxic in vivo Carboplatin - common cancer therapeutic – well known cytotoxic range - going to be used in in vivo study

8 Decrease in malignant cell survival after irradiation varying amounts of radiosensitizer no x-ray 6 MV 160 kV no x-ray 6 MV 160 kV

9 Increase cell killing: Low Energy VS High Energy 160 kV 6 MV radiation dose

10 Decrease in malignant cell survival after irradiation varying radiation dose (with carboplatin) No sig. difference

11 In vivo experiments Non – therapeutic dose of carboplatin 10 3 F98 glioma cells 160 kV 10 Gy 6 MV 10 Gy So, what will this experiment show?

12 In vivo experiments Stay tuned for the sequel

13 Conclusion In vitro experiments showed greater cell death with low energy X-rays Radiosensitized rats treated with low energy X- rays SHOULD live longer

14 Thanks for listening!


Download ppt "Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google