Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAdele Clark Modified over 9 years ago
1
Superiority of 160 kV vs 6 MV X- ray irradiation combined with heavy element radiosensitization By: Sara N. Lim, Anil K. Pradhan, Sultana N. Nahar, Rolf F. Barth, Claudia Turro, Alycia M. Palmer, Erica H. Bell and Xiaokui Mo
2
Outline of presentation Background: X-ray radiotherapy and how can we improve it? Low energy 160 kV vs 6000 kV (6 MV) X-rays What is radiosensitization? enhancing X-ray dose with heavy elements to kill malignant cells Monte Carlo simulations on radiosensitization using heavy elements (high atomic number Z or HZ – review from earlier presentation). Experiments: promising in vitro results In vivo experiments in progress
3
Current Radiotherapy 6 MV clinical linac (Varian Clinac) unfiltered spectrum: ~0-6000 keV (6 MeV) X-rays can not differentiate between tumor tissues and healthy tissues with or with out radiosensitization Reason for use: penetration
4
What if there was a way to increase the damage to tumor tissues that more than makes up for the lack of penetration? There is! With heavy element radiosensitization!
5
Dose Enhancement Factors Geant4 results using 7ug/ml Pt for increase in dose deposition as a function of X-ray energy 160 kV 6 MV
6
In vitro experiments F98 rat glioma cells: Radiosensitized with relatively non- toxic HZ radiosensitizer or carboplatin Irradiated with either 6 MV or 160 kV X- rays to test changes in surviving fraction (SF)
7
In vitro analysis Methods and materials Clonogenic assay with Pt-sensitized F98 cells after broadband X-ray irradiation (160 kV Vs 6 MV, 7 Gy) 1. 2. Radiosensitizers: Pyridine Terpyridine Pt(II) complex (typ-Pt) - low in vitro toxicity - allows decoupling of chemotoxicity and radiotoxicity - unexpectedly cytotoxic in vivo Carboplatin - common cancer therapeutic – well known cytotoxic range - going to be used in in vivo study
8
Decrease in malignant cell survival after irradiation varying amounts of radiosensitizer no x-ray 6 MV 160 kV no x-ray 6 MV 160 kV
9
Increase cell killing: Low Energy VS High Energy 160 kV 6 MV radiation dose
10
Decrease in malignant cell survival after irradiation varying radiation dose (with carboplatin) No sig. difference
11
In vivo experiments Non – therapeutic dose of carboplatin 10 3 F98 glioma cells 160 kV 10 Gy 6 MV 10 Gy So, what will this experiment show?
12
In vivo experiments Stay tuned for the sequel
13
Conclusion In vitro experiments showed greater cell death with low energy X-rays Radiosensitized rats treated with low energy X- rays SHOULD live longer
14
Thanks for listening!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.