Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only"— Presentation transcript:

1 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Merrimack River Bridge Rehabilitation Project Contract #2-Substructure Improvements Contract #B64CN02 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 1

2 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Project Overview Three connected bridges in Haverhill, MA - Merrimack River, North Approach, and Washington St. Bridges; 12 spans total: 1,042 feet. Used by MBTA Commuter Rail, Amtrak Downeaster, and Pan Am freight. Daily service includes approximately 36 passenger trains and 10 freight trains. Project is broken up into two separate contracts due to the unique requirements for rehabilitating a historic bridge and in-river; masonry substructures Contract 1 is Superstructure repair and land substructure strengthening Contract 2 Contract is river pier scour mitigation Total Project Budget: $99,031,203 Total Construction Budget: $68,921,133 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

3 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Contract #1 (B64CN01) Design-Bid-Build Superstructure Rehabilitation Contract ongoing with LMH/CMC. Award amount $23,937,000. Strengthen structural members Clean and paint Replace bearings Improve seismic performance Historic Bridge Rehabilitation better suited using D-B-B because of greater end product control Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

4 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Contract #2 (B64CN02) Design-Build – Substructure Improvements River piers scour countermeasures Improve integrity of pier foundations Reasons for going Design-Build: 1. Contractor input because the complexity of the project and the constructability will dictate the final design from contractor means and methods 2. Access to specialized marine experience and equipment 3. Alternate technical concepts Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

5 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Contract #2 (B64CN02) Design-Build – Substructure Improvements Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

6 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Project Benefits Extend the life of the historic bridges. Lift current speed restriction which is 15 MPH for Commuter Rail and 5 MPH for Freight traffic. Improve protection of piers against river bottom undermining erosion (scour). Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

7 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Design Build Team Selection Seven firms responded to RFQ and LOI, three teams shortlisted. Selected teams submitted Alternate Technical Concepts (ATCs) followed by review of ATCs, submission of proposals and oral presentations. As listed below a combination of the price proposal and technical score resulted in Cianbro as the “Best Value Scorer” Description Cianbro Engineer (HDR) SPS JF White PRICE (Contract Amount) $ 28,270,000 $31,497,000 $ 31,970,000 $ 55,795,000 TECHNICAL SCORE (points) 89.21 - 81.85 81.75 TOTAL SCORE (Price/point) 316,892.73 390,592.55 682,507.65 RANK 1 2 3 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only


Download ppt "Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google